Literature DB >> 11778714

Method for optimizing the correction of the eye's higher-order aberrations in the presence of decentrations.

Antonio Guirao1, Ian G Cox, David R Williams.   

Abstract

The use of a correcting element to compensate for higher-order aberrations in an optical system often requires accurate alignment of the correcting element. This is not always possible, as in the case of a contact lens on the eye. We propose a method consisting of partial correction of every aberration term to minimize the average variance of the residual wave-front aberration produced by Gaussian decentrations (translations and rotations). Analytical expressions to estimate the fraction of every aberration term that should be corrected for a given amount of decentration are derived. To demonstrate the application of this method, three examples are used to compare performance with total and with partial correction. The partial correction is more robust and always yields some benefit regardless of the amount of decentration.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11778714     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.19.000126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  12 in total

1.  Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Konrad Pesudovs; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy.

Authors:  Lan Chi Nguyen; Gareth D Hastings; Matthew J Kauffman; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability.

Authors:  Anita Ticak; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Yue Shi; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.018

6.  Influence of rigid lens decentration and rotation on visual image quality in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Jos J Rozema; Gareth D Hastings; Marta Jiménez-García; Carina Koppen; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.992

7.  Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Julianna Z Zanayed; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.106

9.  Variability of wavefront aberration measurements in small pupil sizes using a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer.

Authors:  Harilaos S Ginis; Sotiris Plainis; Aristophanis Pallikaris
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Centration axis in refractive surgery.

Authors:  Samuel Arba Mosquera; Shwetabh Verma; Colm McAlinden
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.