Literature DB >> 19389418

Limitations of the ocular wavefront correction with contact lenses.

Norberto López-Gil1, José Francisco Castejón-Mochón, Vicente Fernández-Sánchez.   

Abstract

We analyze theoretically, by means of both computer simulations and laboratory experiments, the limitations of correcting aberrations with ideal customized contact lenses. Four experiments are presented: In the first one, we have analyzed the limitations of a static correction on the dynamic wavefront. In the second one, we studied the rotations of a contact lens on the eye using an optical method. The third one researched the limitations of the wavefront correction, focusing on a group of normal and highly aberrated eyes, when the correction suffers from a permanent rotation or translation. The fourth one estimates, under a simple approximation, the error made when applying on the corneal plane the correction corresponding to the wavefront measured at the entrance-pupil plane. Results show that a static correction of the wavefront leaves a residual aberration of 0.15-0.25 microm for a 5 mm pupil. Rotation of the contact lens (up to +/-4 degrees) diminishes the effectiveness of the correction. Horizontal or vertical translations of 0.5mm could generate a high-order-aberration RMS that is higher than the remaining one after a standard low-order correction. In particular, the group of eyes having normal values of high-order aberrations are more sensitive to translations than the one having higher values. Most of the results could be applied to other methods of aberration correction, such as refractive surgery or correction by means of intraocular lenses.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19389418     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Optical quality of aspheric toric intraocular lenses at different degrees of decentering.

Authors:  Cari Pérez-Vives; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa; Santiago García-Lázaro; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Improving vision by pupil masking.

Authors:  Sergio Bonaque-González; Susana Ríos-Rodríguez; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy.

Authors:  Lan Chi Nguyen; Gareth D Hastings; Matthew J Kauffman; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Contact Lenses for Keratoconus- Current Practice.

Authors:  Marilita M Moschos; Eirini Nitoda; Panagiotis Georgoudis; Miltos Balidis; Eleftherios Karageorgiadis; Nikos Kozeis
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-07-31

7.  Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Julianna Z Zanayed; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 8.  Clinical applications of wavefront refraction.

Authors:  Adrian S Bruce; Louis J Catania
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  New Objective Refraction Metric Based on Sphere Fitting to the Wavefront.

Authors:  Mateusz Jaskulski; Andreí Martínez-Finkelshtein; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.