Literature DB >> 33190099

Orientation-specific long-term neural adaptation of the visual system in keratoconus.

Gareth D Hastings1, Alexander W Schill2, Chuan Hu2, Daniel R Coates2, Raymond A Applegate2, Jason D Marsack2.   

Abstract

Eyes with the corneal ectasia keratoconus have performed better than expected (e.g. visual acuity) given their elevated levels of higher-order aberrations that cause rotationally asymmetric retinal blur. Adapted neural processing has been suggested as an explanation but has not been measured across multiple meridional orientations. Using a custom Maxwellian-view laser interferometer to bypass ocular optics, sinusoidal grating neural contrast sensitivity was measured in six eyes (three subjects) with keratoconus and four typical eyes (two subjects) at six spatial frequencies and eight orientations using a two-interval forced-choice paradigm. Total measurement duration was 24 to 28 hours per subject. Neural contrast sensitivity functions of typical eyes agreed with literature and generally showed the oblique effect on a linear-scale and rotational symmetry on a log-scale (rotational symmetry was quantified as the ratio of the minor and major radii of an ellipse fit to all orientations within each spatial frequency; typical eye mean 0.93, median 0.93; where a circle = 1). Mean sensitivities of eyes with keratoconus were 20% to 60% lower (at lower and higher spatial frequencies respectively) than typical eyes. Orientation-specific neural contrast sensitivity functions in keratoconus showed substantial rotational asymmetry (ellipse radii ratio: mean 0.84; median 0.86) and large meridional reductions. The visual image quality metric VSX was used with a permutation test to combine the asymmetric optical aberrations of the eyes with keratoconus and their measured asymmetric neural functions, which illustrated how the neural sensitivities generally mitigated the detrimental effects of the optics. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Keratoconus; Laser interferometry; Neural adaptation; Neural contrast sensitivity; Neural processing; Visual image quality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33190099      PMCID: PMC9119130          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.984


  32 in total

1.  Modulation thresholds for sinusoidal light distributions on the retina.

Authors:  G WESTHEIMER
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1960-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effects of luminance and spatial noise on interferometric contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  N J Coletta; V Sharma
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Neural compensation for long-term asymmetric optical blur to improve visual performance in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.

Authors:  F W Campbell; J J Kulikowski; J Levinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Brief daily periods of unrestricted vision preserve stereopsis in strabismus.

Authors:  Janice M Wensveen; Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Ronald S Harwerth
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Magnitude and orientation of Zernike terms in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Ryo Kosaki; Naoyuki Maeda; Kenichiro Bessho; Yuichi Hori; Kohji Nishida; Asaki Suzaki; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Takashi Fujikado; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Are all aberrations equal?

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Edwin J Sarver; Vic Khemsara
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Julianna Z Zanayed; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.106

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Alexander W Schill; Chuan Hu; Daniel R Coates; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Suprathreshold Contrast Perception Is Altered by Long-term Adaptation to Habitual Optical Blur.

Authors:  Cherlyn J Ng; Ramkumar Sabesan; Antoine Barbot; Martin S Banks; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

3.  Automatic compensation enhances the orientation perception in chronic astigmatism.

Authors:  Sangkyu Son; Won Mok Shim; Hyungoo Kang; Joonyeol Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.