Literature DB >> 12772758

Design principles and limitations of wave-front guided contact lenses.

Larry N Thibos1, Xu Cheng, Arthur Bradley.   

Abstract

The concept of the wave-front guided design of contact lenses is presented from three vantage points: ray optics, wave front aberrations, and optical path-length errors. We argue that the goal of contact lenses is to make all of the optical paths from a distant object to the retina equal in length, regardless of where the path intersects the plane of the eye's pupil. The aberration map of an eye is a prescription for such a lens. Unfortunately, variability of measured aberration maps is a fundamental limit to our knowledge of the true aberration structure of an eye. Variability arises because the eye is a biologic system that changes over time for normal, physiologic reasons. Furthermore, uncertainty in our measurement of the aberration map because of such variable factors, such as alignment of the aberrometer to the eye by the clinician or small fixation errors committed by the patient, will make it difficult to achieve a full measure of success with aberration-correcting contact lenses. The clinical implication of these findings is that multiple measurements of the aberration map should be collected using a protocol that includes realignment of the instrument and then averaging the aberration maps to reduce the level of uncertainty associated with any single measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12772758     DOI: 10.1097/00140068-200301001-00046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  8 in total

1.  Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Konrad Pesudovs; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Dynamic simulation of the effect of soft toric contact lenses movement on retinal image quality.

Authors:  Yafei Niu; Edwin J Sarver; Scott B Stevenson; Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy.

Authors:  Lan Chi Nguyen; Gareth D Hastings; Matthew J Kauffman; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Validation of an off-eye contact lens Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometer.

Authors:  Pete Kollbaum; Meredith Jansen; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Julianna Z Zanayed; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.106

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.