Literature DB >> 31792585

Patients undergoing recurrent CT scans: assessing the magnitude.

Madan M Rehani1, Kai Yang2, Emily R Melick2, John Heil3, Dušan Šalát4, William F Sensakovic5,6, Bob Liu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess percent of patients undergoing multiple CT exams that leads to cumulative effective dose (CED) of ≥ 100 mSv and determine their age distribution.
METHODS: Data was retrieved retrospectively from established radiation dose monitoring systems by setting the threshold value of 100 mSv at four institutions covering 324 hospitals. The number of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv only from recurrent CT exams during a feasible time period between 1 and 5 years was identified. Age and gender distribution of these patients were assessed to identify the magnitude of patients in the relatively lower age group of ≤ 50 years.
RESULTS: Of the 2.5 million (2,504,585) patients who underwent 4.8 million (4,819,661) CT exams during the period of between 1 and 5 years, a total of 33,407 (1.33%) patients received a CED of ≥ 100 mSv with an overall median CED of 130.3 mSv and maximum of 1185 mSv. Although the vast majority (72-86%) of patients are > 50 years of age, nearly 20% (13.4 to 28%) are ≤ 50 years. The minimum time to accrue 100 mSv was a single day at all four institutions, an unreported finding to date.
CONCLUSIONS: We are in an unprecedented era, where patients undergoing multiple CT exams and receiving CED ≥ 100 mSv are not uncommon. While underscoring the need for imaging appropriateness, the consideration of the number and percent of patients with high exposures and related clinical necessities creates an urgent need for the industry to develop CT scanners and protocols with sub-mSv radiation dose, a goal that has been lingering. KEY POINTS: • We are in an era where patients undergoing multiple CT exams during a short span of 1 to 5 years are not uncommon and a sizable fraction among them are below 50 years of age. • This leads to cumulative radiation dose to individual patients at which radiation effects are of real concern. • There is an urgent need for the industry to develop CT scanners with sub-mSv radiation dose, a goal that has been lingering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient safety; Radiation dosage; Radiation protection; Radiologic technology; Risk

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31792585     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06523-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Multiple testing, cumulative radiation dose, and clinical indications in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Shepard D Weiner; Adam Bernheim; Michal Kulon; Sabahat Bokhari; Lynne L Johnson; Jeffrey W Moses; Stephen Balter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

3.  Verification of organ doses calculated by a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in thoracic CT protocols.

Authors:  Nika Guberina; Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam; Kai Naßenstein; Michael Forsting; Jens Theysohn; Axel Wetter; Adrian Ringelstein
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Medical imaging in the 21st century--getting the best bang for the rad.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Estimated radiation exposure from medical imaging in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Andreana De Mauri; Marco Brambilla; Doriana Chiarinotti; Roberta Matheoud; Alessandro Carriero; Martino De Leo
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Andrew J Einstein; Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  How tracking radiologic procedures and dose helps: experience from Finland.

Authors:  Raija Seuri; Madan M Rehani; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Aaron Sodickson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  International Atomic Energy Agency study with referring physicians on patient radiation exposure and its tracking: a prospective survey using a web-based questionnaire.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Theocharis Berris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  26 in total

1.  Challenges for managing the cumulative effective dose for patients.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  High CT doses return to the agenda.

Authors:  W Rühm; R M Harrison
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; John Heil; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  High-Dose Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures in Patients: Radiation Management Recommendations for Interventionalists.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Donald L Miller; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Patient-level dose monitoring in computed tomography: tracking cumulative dose from multiple multi-sequence exams with tube current modulation in children.

Authors:  Azadeh Tabari; Xinhua Li; Kai Yang; Bob Liu; Michael S Gee; Sjirk J Westra
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-09-17

6.  Automatic Scan Range Delimitation in Chest CT Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Aydin Demircioğlu; Moon-Sung Kim; Magdalena Charis Stein; Nika Guberina; Lale Umutlu; Kai Nassenstein
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 7.  Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging.

Authors:  Charles Brower; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

8.  Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: call for action.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Jenia Vassileva; Agnieszka Kuchcinska; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Dosimetric quantities and effective dose in medical imaging: a summary for medical doctors.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Guy Frija; Reinhard Loose; Graciano Paulo; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Claudio Granata; Jonas Andersson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 10.  Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?

Authors:  Jenia Vassileva; Ola Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.