Literature DB >> 28618854

Verification of organ doses calculated by a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in thoracic CT protocols.

Nika Guberina1, Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam1, Kai Naßenstein1, Michael Forsting1, Jens Theysohn1, Axel Wetter1, Adrian Ringelstein1.   

Abstract

Background The importance of monitoring of the radiation dose received by the human body during computed tomography (CT) examinations is not negligible. Several dose-monitoring software tools emerged in order to monitor and control dose distribution during CT examinations. Some software tools incorporate Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and allow calculation of effective dose and organ dose apart from standard dose descriptors. Purpose To verify the results of a dose-monitoring software tool based on MCS in assessment of effective and organ doses in thoracic CT protocols. Material and Methods Phantom measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD LiF:Mg,Ti) using two different thoracic CT protocols of the clinical routine: (I) standard CT thorax (CTT); and (II) CTT with high-pitch mode, P = 3.2. Radiation doses estimated with MCS and measured with TLDs were compared. Results Inter-modality comparison showed an excellent correlation between MCS-simulated and TLD-measured doses ((I) after localizer correction r = 0.81; (II) r = 0.87). The following effective and organ doses were determined: (I) (a) effective dose = MCS 1.2 mSv, TLD 1.3 mSv; (b) thyroid gland = MCS 2.8 mGy, TLD 2.5 mGy; (c) thymus = MCS 3.1 mGy, TLD 2.5 mGy; (d) bone marrow = MCS 0.8 mGy, TLD 0.9 mGy; (e) breast = MCS 2.5 mGy, TLD 2.2 mGy; (f) lung = MCS 2.8 mGy, TLD 2.7 mGy; (II) (a) effective dose = MCS 0.6 mSv, TLD 0.7 mSv; (b) thyroid gland = MCS 1.4 mGy, TLD 1.8 mGy; (c) thymus = MCS 1.4 mGy, TLD 1.8 mGy; (d) bone marrow = MCS 0.4 mGy, TLD 0.5 mGy; (e) breast = MCS 1.1 mGy, TLD 1.1 mGy; (f) lung = MCS 1.2 mGy, TLD 1.3 mGy. Conclusion Overall, in thoracic CT protocols, organ doses simulated by the dose-monitoring software tool were coherent to those measured by TLDs. Despite some challenges, the dose-monitoring software was capable of an accurate dose calculation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo Simulation; Radiation exposure; computed tomography; organ dose; radiation monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28618854     DOI: 10.1177/0284185117716199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  Radiation exposure during CT-guided biopsies: recent CT machines provide markedly lower doses.

Authors:  Nika Guberina; Michael Forsting; Adrian Ringelstein; Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam; Kai Nassenstein; Jens Theysohn; Axel Wetter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiation exposure of image-guided intrathecal administration of nusinersen to adult patients with spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  D Oldenburg; N Guberina; B Stolte; K Kizina; E Stenzel; A Radbruch; C Kleinschnitz; T Hagenacker; M Forsting; C Mönninghoff
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Patients undergoing recurrent CT scans: assessing the magnitude.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Kai Yang; Emily R Melick; John Heil; Dušan Šalát; William F Sensakovic; Bob Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Breast Radiation Exposure of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared to Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Clinical Follow-Up Setting.

Authors:  Marcel Opitz; Sebastian Zensen; Katharina Breuckmann; Denise Bos; Michael Forsting; Oliver Hoffmann; Martin Stuschke; Axel Wetter; Nika Guberina
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  Assessment of Suspected Malignancy or Infection in Immunocompromised Patients After Solid Organ Transplantation by [18F]FDG PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/MRI.

Authors:  Nika Guberina; Anja Gäckler; Johannes Grueneisen; Axel Wetter; Oliver Witzke; Ken Herrmann; Christoph Rischpler; Wolfgang Fendler; Lale Umutlu; Lino Morris Sawicki; Michael Forsting; Hana Rohn
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.