Literature DB >> 34255191

Dosimetric quantities and effective dose in medical imaging: a summary for medical doctors.

Eliseo Vano1, Guy Frija2, Reinhard Loose3, Graciano Paulo4, Efstathios Efstathopoulos5, Claudio Granata6, Jonas Andersson7.   

Abstract

This review presents basic information on the dosimetric quantities used in medical imaging for reporting patient doses and establishing diagnostic reference levels. The proper use of the radiation protection quantity "effective dose" to compare doses delivered by different radiological procedures and different imaging modalities with its uncertainties and limitations, is summarised. The estimates of population doses required by the European Directive on Basic Safety Standards is commented on. Referrers and radiologists should be familiar with the dose quantities to inform patients about radiation risks and benefits. The application of effective dose on the cumulative doses from recurrent imaging procedures is also discussed. Patient summary: Basic information on the measurement units (dosimetric quantities) used in medical imaging for reporting radiation doses should be understandable to patients. The Working Group on "Dosimetry for imaging in clinical practice" recommended that a brief explanation on the used dosimetric quantities and units included in the examination imaging report, should be available for patients. The use of the quantity "effective dose" to compare doses to which patients are exposed to from different radiological procedures and its uncertainties and limitations, should also be explained in plain language. This is also relevant for the dialog on to the cumulative doses from recurrent imaging procedures. The paper summarises these concepts, including the need to estimate the population doses required by the European Directive on Basic Safety Standards. Referrers and radiologists should be familiar with the dose quantities to inform patients about radiation risks and benefits.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cumulative dose; Diagnostic reference levels; Dosimetric quantities; Effective dose; Patient information

Year:  2021        PMID: 34255191     DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01041-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insights Imaging        ISSN: 1869-4101


  20 in total

1.  Point/counterpoint. The use of effective dose for medical procedures is inappropriate.

Authors:  Caridad Borrás; Walter Huda; Colin G Orton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The application of effective dose to medical exposures.

Authors:  Colin J Martin
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 3.  Utilization strategies for cumulative dose estimates: a review and rational assessment.

Authors:  Daniel J Durand; Robert L Dixon; Richard L Morin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Conversion factors to estimate effective doses from kerma area product in interventional cardiology. Impact of added filtration.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Roberto M Sánchez; José M Fernández; José I Ten
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Effective dose: practice, purpose and pitfalls for nuclear medicine.

Authors:  C J Martin
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 1.394

6.  Use of effective dose.

Authors:  J D Harrison; M Balonov; C J Martin; P Ortiz Lopez; H-G Menzel; J R Simmonds; R Smith-Bindman; R Wakeford
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2016-03-15

7.  Appropriate Use of Effective Dose in Radiation Protection and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Darrell R Fisher; Frederic H Fahey
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 8.  Effective dose from radiation exposure in medicine: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Colin J Martin; John D Harrison; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Estimates of the number of patients with high cumulative doses through recurrent CT exams in 35 OECD countries.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Michael Hauptmann
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 2.685

10.  Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: call for action.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Jenia Vassileva; Agnieszka Kuchcinska; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  X-ray attenuation of bone, soft and adipose tissue in CT from 70 to 140 kV and comparison with 3D printable additive manufacturing materials.

Authors:  Xiangjie Ma; Michael Figl; Ewald Unger; Martin Buschmann; Peter Homolka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.