Literature DB >> 32822543

Challenges for managing the cumulative effective dose for patients.

Eliseo Vano1.   

Abstract

Notwithstanding that 100 mSv is not a threshold for radiation effects, cumulative effective dose (CED) for patients of ≥100 mSv derived from recurrent imaging procedures with ionising radiation has been recently the topic of several publications. The International Commission on Radiological Protection has alerted on the problems to use effective dose for risk estimation in individual patients but has accepted to use this quantity for comparison the relative radiation risks between different imaging modalities. A new International Commission on Radiological Protection document on the use of effective dose (including medicine), is in preparation. Recently published data on the number of patients with CED ≥100 mSv ranged from 0.6 to 3.4% in CT and around 4% in interventional radiology. The challenges to manage the existing situation are summarised. The main aspects identified are: 1) New technology with dose reduction techniques. 2) Refinements in the application of the justification and optimisation for these groups of patients. 3) Patient dose management systems with alerts on the cumulative high doses. 4) Education on the proper use of cumulative effective dose for referrers and practitioners including information for patients. 5) Future research programmes in radiation biology and epidemiology may profit the patient dose data from the groups with high cumulative dose values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32822543      PMCID: PMC7716011          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  16 in total

1.  Should the justification of medical exposures take account of radiation risks from previous examinations?

Authors:  C Walsh; D Murphy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Is it possible to kill the radiation risk issue in computed tomography?

Authors:  Marc Kachelrieß; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Radiation Effective Dose Above 100 mSv From Fluoroscopically Guided Intervention: Frequency and Patient Medical Condition.

Authors:  Xinhua Li; Joshua A Hirsch; Madan M Rehani; Suvranu Ganguli; Kai Yang; Bob Liu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  CT is still not a low-dose imaging modality.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Recurrent imaging procedures with ionising radiation on the same patient. Should we pay more attention?

Authors:  Eliseo Vano
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.394

6.  How tracking radiologic procedures and dose helps: experience from Finland.

Authors:  Raija Seuri; Madan M Rehani; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Pieter F Baeyens; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Richard D Nawfel; Richard Hanson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  International Atomic Energy Agency study with referring physicians on patient radiation exposure and its tracking: a prospective survey using a web-based questionnaire.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Theocharis Berris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: call for action.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Jenia Vassileva; Agnieszka Kuchcinska; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Radiation dose management systems-requirements and recommendations for users from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative.

Authors:  Reinhard W Loose; Eliseo Vano; Peter Mildenberger; Virginia Tsapaki; Davide Caramella; Johan Sjöberg; Graciano Paulo; Alberto Torresin; Sebastian Schindera; Guy Frija; John Damilakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Zoe Brady
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 2.  The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.

Authors:  Donald Frush
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Development of a New Radiation Shield for the Face and Neck of IVR Physicians.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Sato; Yoichi Eguchi; Chika Yamazaki; Takanobu Hino; Toshikazu Saida; Koichi Chida
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 4.  Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?

Authors:  Jenia Vassileva; Ola Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.