Literature DB >> 33683390

Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.

Madan M Rehani1,2, John Heil3, Vinit Baliyan4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the magnitude and characterization of CT imaging protocols of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day.
METHODS: In this multicentric retrospective study covering up to 279 hospitals from January 2015 to December 2019, the effective dose (E) as estimated by dose management system from dose length product of patients was filtered and grouped into per-day dose bands (≤ 20, > 20-50, > 50-70, > 70-100, > 100-200, > 200 mSv). Information on patient's age and imaging protocol was noted. The data were analyzed to determine the frequency of occurrence in each dose band. Top 20 CT imaging protocols that led to patients with a dose of ≥ 50 mSv in a single acquisition were identified and their relative frequency was estimated.
RESULTS: A total of approx. 4.3 million (4,283,738) CT exams were performed in approx. 3.9 million (3,880,524) patient-days indicating 9.41% had more than one CT exam in a single day. There were 31,058 (0.8%) patient-days with ≥ 50 mSv and 1191 (0.03%) with ≥ 100 mSv. Nearly 1/3rd patient-days reaching ≥ 50 mSv were of patients aged 50 years or younger. The top 20 CT imaging protocols that led to ≥ 50 mSv in a single day belonged to the body region (chest or abdomen and pelvis) and nearly one-third were angiographic studies.
CONCLUSIONS: In the first study of its kind, we report that patients with 50 mSv+ in a single day or a single exam are not rare. The information on imaging protocols leading to such doses and their frequency has been provided to help develop dose management strategies. KEY POINTS: • Our study of 4,283,738 CT exams performed in 3,880,524 patient-days indicates 0.8% with 50 mSv+ and 0.03% with 100 mSv+ in a single day. • A total of 9.41% underwent more than one CT exam in a single day; nearly 1/3rd of those with 50 mSv+ were ≤ 50 years of age. • Identified top 20 CT imaging protocols that led to 50 mSv+ doses in a single exam. All belong to chest or abdomen and pelvis and nearly 1/3rd were angiographic studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient safety; Radiation dosage; Radiation protection; Radiologic technology; Risk

Year:  2021        PMID: 33683390     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07734-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

1.  Unindicated multiphase CT scans in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies for women of reproductive age: a significant source of unnecessary exposure.

Authors:  Caterina Giannitto; Mauro Campoleoni; Sara Maccagnoni; Alessio Salvatore Angileri; Maria Carmela Grimaldi; Nino Giannitto; Francesca De Piano; Eleonora Ancona; Pietro Raimondo Biondetti; Andrea Alessandro Esposito
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Routine use of precontrast and delayed acquisitions in abdominal CT: time for change.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2013-04

3.  CT is still not a low-dose imaging modality.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  E-pharmacovigilance: development and implementation of a computable knowledge base to identify adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Antje Neubert; Harald Dormann; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Thomas Bürkle; Wolfgang Rascher; Reinhold Sojer; Kay Brune; Manfred Criegee-Rieck
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Effective dose from radiation exposure in medicine: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Colin J Martin; John D Harrison; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Estimates of the number of patients with high cumulative doses through recurrent CT exams in 35 OECD countries.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Michael Hauptmann
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Patients undergoing recurrent CT scans: assessing the magnitude.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Kai Yang; Emily R Melick; John Heil; Dušan Šalát; William F Sensakovic; Bob Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Robert D Daniels; Elisabeth Cardis; Harry M Cullings; Ethel Gilbert; Michael Hauptmann; Gerald Kendall; Dominique Laurier; Martha S Linet; Mark P Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; David B Richardson; Daniel Stram; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

9.  Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Summary Bias Assessment and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michael Hauptmann; Robert D Daniels; Elisabeth Cardis; Harry M Cullings; Gerald Kendall; Dominique Laurier; Martha S Linet; Mark P Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; David B Richardson; Daniel O Stram; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Ethel S Gilbert; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

10.  Influence of age, sex and calendar year on lifetime accumulated red bone marrow dose from diagnostic radiation exposure.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hoffmann; Merle Friederike Meiboom; Kerstin Weitmann; Claudia Terschüren; Heiner von Boetticher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Zoe Brady
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 2.  The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.

Authors:  Donald Frush
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Strategies for Dose Optimization: Views From Health Care Systems.

Authors:  Robin R Whitebird; Leif I Solberg; Philip W Chu; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.240

Review 4.  Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging.

Authors:  Charles Brower; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 5.  Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?

Authors:  Jenia Vassileva; Ola Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 6.  Cumulative radiation doses from recurrent PET-CT examinations.

Authors:  Makoto Hosono; Mamoru Takenaka; Hajime Monzen; Mikoto Tamura; Masatoshi Kudo; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.