Azadeh Tabari1, Xinhua Li1, Kai Yang1, Bob Liu1, Michael S Gee1, Sjirk J Westra2. 1. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 34 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 34 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA. swestra@partners.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In children exposed to multiple computed tomography (CT) exams, performed with varying z-axis coverage and often with tube current modulation, it is inaccurate to add volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) to obtain cumulative dose values. OBJECTIVE: To introduce the patient-size-specific z-axis dose profile and its dose line integral (DLI) as new dose metrics, and to use them to compare cumulative dose calculations against conventional measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all children with 2 or more abdominal-pelvic CT scans performed from 2013 through 2019, we retrospectively recorded all series kV, z-axis tube current profile, CTDIvol, dose-length product (DLP) and calculated SSDE. We constructed dose profiles as a function of z-axis location for each series. One author identified the z-axis location of the superior mesenteric artery origin on each series obtained to align the dose profiles for construction of each patient's cumulative profile. We performed pair-wise comparisons between the peak dose of the cumulative patient dose profile and ΣSSDE, and between ΣDLI and ΣDLP. RESULTS: We recorded dose data in 143 series obtained in 48 children, ages 0-2 years (n=15) and 8-16 years (n=33): ΣSSDE 12.7±6.7 and peak dose 15.1±8.1 mGy, ΣDLP 278±194 and ΣDLI 550±292 mGy·cm. Peak dose exceeded ΣSSDE by 20.6% (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.9-26.4%, P<0.001), and ΣDLI exceeded ΣDLP by 114% (IQR: 86.5-147.0%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our methodology represents a novel approach for evaluating radiation exposure in recurring pediatric abdominal CT examinations, both at the individual and population levels. Under a wide range of patient variables and acquisition conditions, graphic depiction of the cumulative z-axis dose profile across and beyond scan ranges, including the peak dose of the profile, provides a better tool for cumulative dose documentation than simple summations of SSDE. ΣDLI is advantageous in characterizing overall energy absorption over ΣDLP, which significantly underestimated this in all children.
BACKGROUND: In children exposed to multiple computed tomography (CT) exams, performed with varying z-axis coverage and often with tube current modulation, it is inaccurate to add volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) to obtain cumulative dose values. OBJECTIVE: To introduce the patient-size-specific z-axis dose profile and its dose line integral (DLI) as new dose metrics, and to use them to compare cumulative dose calculations against conventional measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all children with 2 or more abdominal-pelvic CT scans performed from 2013 through 2019, we retrospectively recorded all series kV, z-axis tube current profile, CTDIvol, dose-length product (DLP) and calculated SSDE. We constructed dose profiles as a function of z-axis location for each series. One author identified the z-axis location of the superior mesenteric artery origin on each series obtained to align the dose profiles for construction of each patient's cumulative profile. We performed pair-wise comparisons between the peak dose of the cumulative patient dose profile and ΣSSDE, and between ΣDLI and ΣDLP. RESULTS: We recorded dose data in 143 series obtained in 48 children, ages 0-2 years (n=15) and 8-16 years (n=33): ΣSSDE 12.7±6.7 and peak dose 15.1±8.1 mGy, ΣDLP 278±194 and ΣDLI 550±292 mGy·cm. Peak dose exceeded ΣSSDE by 20.6% (interquartile range [IQR]: 9.9-26.4%, P<0.001), and ΣDLI exceeded ΣDLP by 114% (IQR: 86.5-147.0%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our methodology represents a novel approach for evaluating radiation exposure in recurring pediatric abdominal CT examinations, both at the individual and population levels. Under a wide range of patient variables and acquisition conditions, graphic depiction of the cumulative z-axis dose profile across and beyond scan ranges, including the peak dose of the profile, provides a better tool for cumulative dose documentation than simple summations of SSDE. ΣDLI is advantageous in characterizing overall energy absorption over ΣDLP, which significantly underestimated this in all children.
Authors: Atul Padole; Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja; Alexi Otrakji; Da Zhang; Bob Liu; X George Xu; Mannudeep K Kalra Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Adam C Turner; Di Zhang; Maryam Khatonabadi; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Fred A Mettler; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield; Charles E Chambers; Jennifer G Elee; Donald P Frush; Donald L Miller; Henry D Royal; Michael T Milano; David C Spelic; Armin J Ansari; Wesley E Bolch; Gary M Guebert; Robert H Sherrier; James M Smith; Richard J Vetter Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Madan M Rehani; Kai Yang; Emily R Melick; John Heil; Dušan Šalát; William F Sensakovic; Bob Liu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Madan M Rehani; Emily R Melick; Raza M Alvi; Ruhani Doda Khera; Salma Batool-Anwar; Tomas G Neilan; Michael Bettmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Aaron Sodickson; Pieter F Baeyens; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Richard D Nawfel; Richard Hanson; Ramin Khorasani Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 11.105