Literature DB >> 31792583

Multinational data on cumulative radiation exposure of patients from recurrent radiological procedures: call for action.

Marco Brambilla1, Jenia Vassileva2, Agnieszka Kuchcinska3, Madan M Rehani4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To have a global picture of the recurrent use of CT imaging to a level where cumulative effective dose (CED) to individual patients may be exceeding 100 mSv at which organ doses typically are in a range at which radiation effects are of concern
METHODS: The IAEA convened a meeting in 2019 with participants from 26 countries, representatives of various organizations, and experts in radiology, medical physics, radiation biology, and epidemiology. Participants were asked to collect data prior to the meeting on cumulative radiation doses to assess the magnitude of patients above a defined level of CED.
RESULTS: It was observed that the number of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv is much larger than previously known or anticipated. Studies were presented in the meeting with data from about 3.2 million patients who underwent imaging procedures over periods of between 1 and 5 years in different hospitals. It is probable that an additional 0.9 million patients reach the CED ≥ 100 mSv every year globally.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for urgent actions by all stakeholders to address the issue of high cumulative radiation doses to patients. The actions include development of appropriateness criteria/referral guidelines by professional societies for patients who require recurrent imaging studies, development of CT machines with lower radiation dose than today by manufacturers, and development of policies by risk management organizations to enhance patient radiation safety. Alert values for cumulative radiation exposures of patients should be set up and introduced in dose monitoring systems. KEY POINTS: • Recurrent radiological imaging procedures leading to high radiation dose to patients are more common than ever before. • Tracking of radiation exposure of individual patients provides useful information on cumulative radiation dose. • There is a need for urgent actions by all stakeholders to address the issue of high cumulative radiation doses to patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient safety; Radiation dosage; Radiation protection; Radiologic Technology; Risk

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31792583     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06528-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  49 in total

Review 1.  Current issues and actions in radiation protection of patients.

Authors:  Ola Holmberg; Jim Malone; Madan Rehani; Donald McLean; Renate Czarwinski
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Medical radiation exposure in children with inflammatory bowel disease estimates high cumulative doses.

Authors:  Cary G Sauer; Subra Kugathasan; Diego R Martin; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.325

3.  Use of effective dose.

Authors:  J D Harrison; M Balonov; C J Martin; P Ortiz Lopez; H-G Menzel; J R Simmonds; R Smith-Bindman; R Wakeford
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2016-03-15

4.  Temporal trends in imaging and associated radiation exposure in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  S Chatu; A Poullis; R Holmes; R Greenhalgh; R C G Pollok
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Radiation exposure in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome in the years 2001-2011.

Authors:  Hanna Englund; Katarina Lidén K; Torbjörn Lind; Torbjörn Sundström; Pontus Karling
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and imaging-related radiation: are we increasing the likelihood of malignancy?

Authors:  Yonathan Fuchs; James Markowitz; Toba Weinstein; Nina Kohn; Jeanne Choi-Rosen; Jeremiah Levine
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.839

7.  Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark J Eisenberg; Jonathan Afilalo; Patrick R Lawler; Michal Abrahamowicz; Hugues Richard; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Factors associated with radiation exposure in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Z Levi; E Fraser; R Krongrad; R Hazazi; O benjaminov; J meyerovitch; O B Tal; A Choen; Y Niv; G Fraser
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Radiation Exposure in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Fourteen-Year Review at a Tertiary Care Centre in Malaysia

Authors:  Jeevinesh Naidu; Zhiqin Wong; Shanthi Palaniappan; Chai Soon Ngiu; Nur Yazmin Yaacob; Hamzaini Abdul Hamid; Marjanu Hikmah Elias; Norfilza Mohamad Mokhtar; Raja Affendi Raja Ali
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-04-01

10.  Radiation Exposure from Diagnostic Imaging in a Cohort of Pediatric Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Alexandra Seal; Michael Hawkes; Ravi Bhargava; Michelle Noga; Jutta Preiksaitis; Curtis Mabilangan; Joan Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Challenges for managing the cumulative effective dose for patients.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  High CT doses return to the agenda.

Authors:  W Rühm; R M Harrison
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; John Heil; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  High-Dose Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures in Patients: Radiation Management Recommendations for Interventionalists.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Donald L Miller; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Cumulative radiation doses due to nuclear medicine examinations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Agnieszka Kuchcińska; Roberta Matheoud; Alfredo Muni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.629

6.  Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Zoe Brady
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.629

7.  Persistent DNA Double-Strand Breaks After Repeated Diagnostic CT Scans in Breast Epithelial Cells and Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Natalia V Bogdanova; Nina Jguburia; Dhanya Ramachandran; Nora Nischik; Katharina Stemwedel; Georg Stamm; Thomas Werncke; Frank Wacker; Thilo Dörk; Hans Christiansen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging.

Authors:  Charles Brower; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 9.  Dosimetric quantities and effective dose in medical imaging: a summary for medical doctors.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Guy Frija; Reinhard Loose; Graciano Paulo; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Claudio Granata; Jonas Andersson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 10.  Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?

Authors:  Jenia Vassileva; Ola Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.