Casey Van Stappen1, Roman Davydov2, Zhi-Yong Yang3, Ruixi Fan4, Yisong Guo4, Eckhard Bill1, Lance C Seefeldt3, Brian M Hoffman2, Serena DeBeer1. 1. Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion , Stiftstrasse 34-36 , 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr , Germany. 2. Department of Chemistry , Northwestern University , Evanston , Illinois 60208 , United States. 3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Utah State University , Logan , Utah 84322 , United States. 4. Department of Chemistry , Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania 15213 , United States.
Abstract
Mo nitrogenase (N2ase) utilizes a two-component protein system, the catalytic MoFe and its electron-transfer partner FeP, to reduce atmospheric dinitrogen (N2) to ammonia (NH3). The FeMo cofactor contained in the MoFe protein serves as the catalytic center for this reaction and has long inspired model chemistry oriented toward activating N2. This field of chemistry has relied heavily on the detailed characterization of how Mo N2ase accomplishes this feat. Understanding the reaction mechanism of Mo N2ase itself has presented one of the most challenging problems in bioinorganic chemistry because of the ephemeral nature of its catalytic intermediates, which are difficult, if not impossible, to singly isolate. This is further exacerbated by the near necessity of FeP to reduce native MoFe, rendering most traditional means of selective reduction inept. We have now investigated the first fundamental intermediate of the MoFe catalytic cycle, E1, as prepared both by low-flux turnover and radiolytic cryoreduction, using a combination of Mo Kα high-energy-resolution fluorescence detection and Fe K-edge partial-fluorescence-yield X-ray absorption spectroscopy techniques. The results demonstrate that the formation of this state is the result of an Fe-centered reduction and that Mo remains redox-innocent. Furthermore, using Fe X-ray absorption and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopies, we correlate a previously reported unique species formed under cryoreducing conditions to the natively formed E1 state through annealing, demonstrating the viability of cryoreduction in studying the catalytic intermediates of MoFe.
Mo nitrogenase (N2ase) utilizes a two-component protein system, the catalytic MoFe and its electron-transfer partner FeP, to reduce atmospheric dinitrogen (N2) to ammonia (NH3). The FeMo cofactor contained in the MoFe protein serves as the catalytic center for this reaction and has long inspired model chemistry oriented toward activating N2. This field of chemistry has relied heavily on the detailed characterization of how Mo N2ase accomplishes this feat. Understanding the reaction mechanism of Mo N2ase itself has presented one of the most challenging problems in bioinorganic chemistry because of the ephemeral nature of its catalytic intermediates, which are difficult, if not impossible, to singly isolate. This is further exacerbated by the near necessity of FeP to reduce native MoFe, rendering most traditional means of selective reduction inept. We have now investigated the first fundamental intermediate of the MoFe catalytic cycle, E1, as prepared both by low-flux turnover and radiolytic cryoreduction, using a combination of Mo Kα high-energy-resolution fluorescence detection and Fe K-edge partial-fluorescence-yield X-ray absorption spectroscopy techniques. The results demonstrate that the formation of this state is the result of an Fe-centered reduction and that Mo remains redox-innocent. Furthermore, using Fe X-ray absorption and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopies, we correlate a previously reported unique species formed under cryoreducing conditions to the natively formed E1 state through annealing, demonstrating the viability of cryoreduction in studying the catalytic intermediates of MoFe.
The
conversion of dinitrogen (N2) to bioavailable ammonia (NH3) is a fundamental step in the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle.[1] In nature this process is predominately carried
out by nitrogenase (N2ase) enzymes, which have provided the majority
of fixed nitrogen for living organisms over the past 2 billion years.[2−4] Perhaps the most efficient and well-studied of these systems is
the Mo-dependent enzyme “MoFe”, which contains the FeMo
cofactor (7Fe-9S-1Mo-1C, commonly referred to as FeMoco; Scheme ) and the eight Fe
containing P-cluster. MoFe functions along with a [4Fe-4S] cluster-containing
iron protein (FeP), which serves as the native reductant of MoFe.
Scheme 1
Current Proposed Relationship between the Previously Observed Natively
Reduced (MR) and Cryoreduced (MI) Species Formed
at the FeMoco Cluster
Elements are colored as follows:
Mo, cyan; Fe, orange; S, yellow; N, blue; O, red; C, gray.
Current Proposed Relationship between the Previously Observed Natively
Reduced (MR) and Cryoreduced (MI) Species Formed
at the FeMoco Cluster
Elements are colored as follows:
Mo, cyan; Fe, orange; S, yellow; N, blue; O, red; C, gray.Mo N2ase and the FeMoco cluster have long inspired
model chemistry for the activation of N2 and other small
molecules. Shortly following the discovery of Mo as an essential component
of Mo N2ase,[5] a field of chemistry focused
around the tuning of single and polynuclear Mo complexes to bind and
reduce N2 ensued.[6−14] This route has been somewhat successful and has provided some of
the first catalytic N2-activating model complexes.[6,9,11,12,15−22] However, in recent years, the focus has turned to Fe because numerous
spectroscopic (as well as crystallographic) studies show that substrate
binding occurs at a four-Fe face (Fe2,3,6,7) of FeMoco and not at
Mo.[23−28] Nevertheless, whether or not Mo plays any role in redox chemistry
under native reducing conditions has yet to be established, as does
the potential role of Mo during the N2 reduction stages.During the catalytic cycle, stepwise electron transfer is coupled
to the transfer of a proton to create intermediates denoted as E(nH), where n is the number of electron-transfer steps (Scheme ). The ratios of these intermediates to one
another are dependent on the rate of electron transfer versus dihydrogen
(H2) production from the states E2–E4 and can be influenced by adjusting the ratio of MoFe/FeP
during turnover. H2 can be produced at any point in which
at least two electrons and protons have accumulated.[29−32] In the absence of N2, the cycle is limited to the population
of intermediates E0–E4.
Scheme 2
Simplified
Depiction of the Kinetic Mechanism of Mo-Dependent N2ase Describing
the Relationships between the Catalytic Intermediates E, in Which n Represents the Number
of Electrons/Protons Delivered to FeMoco from FeP,[29−32]
The number of added protons and N atoms is indicated for n = 4.
Simplified
Depiction of the Kinetic Mechanism of Mo-Dependent N2ase Describing
the Relationships between the Catalytic Intermediates E, in Which n Represents the Number
of Electrons/Protons Delivered to FeMoco from FeP,[29−32]
The number of added protons and N atoms is indicated for n = 4.The presence of this distribution
of intermediate states during catalytic turnover has made the trapping
of individual intermediate species particularly difficult. This problem
has been partly overcome by the use of electron paramagnetic resonance
(EPR) and electron nuclear double resonance/electron spin-echo envelope
modulation (ENDOR/ESEEM) methods to study these intermediates, which
have established that N2 reduction to 2NH3 requires
8 equiv of H+ and e–, along with 16 ATP,
as proposed earlier,[3,33−36] to bind N2 and cleave
the triple bond of nitrogen at FeMoco to produce two molecules of
NH3 (eq ).[4,37,38]As indicated in Scheme , during its catalytic cycle, N2ase is activated
to reduce the N≡N triple bond by the accumulation of n = 4 e–/H+, followed by the
reductive elimination of H2 coupled to N2 binding/reduction.The EPR and ENDOR/ESEEM methods used to achieve these results are
limited to odd-electron E intermediates.
The resting state of FeMoco is odd-electron, meaning that these methods
were restricted to n-even states, leaving the n-odd states unexamined. Beyond the need for ways to address
these states, methods that are capable of selective reduction of the
FeMoco cluster would be highly valuable for studying all intermediates.
This has been no easy task, and while progress has been made in reducing
MoFe in the absence of FeP,[39−43] there is still no precedence for chemical or electrochemical means
of single-electron reduction. To this end, cryoreduction has already
offered a promising route to accessing n-even states
in the accumulation phase of Mo N2ase (E0–E4).[44,45] Cryoreduction involves the direct
injection of a radiolytically produced mobile electron into a metal
center or cluster at 77 K. Previously, this technique was successfully
used to decouple electron- and proton-transfer steps when moving between
the E0 and E2 states of FeMoco.[45] This technique has also been previously applied in the 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy investigation of several
oxidation states of Mo N2ase, where it was proposed that native turnover
resulted in a Mo-centered reduction, while cryoreduction produced
an alternative Fe-reduced state.[46]It is well-known from the pioneering work of Lowe and Thorneley that
both electron and proton transfer to the FeMoco cluster occur during
native turnover.[29−32] This provides the opportunity for protonation of either a sulfur
or iron in the FeMoco cluster. While spectroscopic characterization
of the E1 and E3 states has remained minimal
due to their non-Kramers spin states, intensive ENDOR studies support
the formation of Fe-hydride species in the E2 and E4 states.[38,47,48] From logical deduction, it is also possible that the E1 state involves the formation of a metal-hydride species, making
this an alternative to the protonation of a cluster sulfide (Scheme ). Metal-hydride
species are generally highly covalent, making it possible for the
average electron density at iron in a metal-hydride containing E1 state to appear very similar or even more oxidized than that
of E0. Similarly, protonation of an inorganic sulfide in
the cluster may also skew the electron density at Fe despite being
formally reduced. In this sense, protonation of either Fe or S may
serve to maintain a similar reduction potential for each E state, allowing the catalytic cycle to advance.[4] Given these considerations, it may be that the
discrepancies between the originally reported[46] native turnover and cryoreduced species arise not from a change
in the locale of reduction but because the cryoreduced state has not
acquired a proton, and that follow-up protonation of FeMoco generates
the E1 state (as illustrated in Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Proposed States and Relationships
between the E0, E1, and E2 States
of Mo N2ase
“M” is used to simply
denote the entire FeMoco cluster rather than a particular binding
site.
Proposed States and Relationships
between the E0, E1, and E2 States
of Mo N2ase
“M” is used to simply
denote the entire FeMoco cluster rather than a particular binding
site.Herein, we employ a series of spectroscopic
methods to elucidate the nature of the E1 and cryoreduced
states of MoFe. We have employed low-flux turnover conditions ([MoFe]:[FeP]
= 50:1) to generate favorable quantities of the E1 state,
using X-band EPR to monitor the decrease of E0 and ensure
that further reduced species are not formed. High-energy-resolution-fluorescence-detected
(HERFD) and partial-fluorescence-detected (PFY) X-ray absorption spectroscopy
(XAS) techniques are employed as element-selective and oxidation-state
sensitive probes of Mo and Fe to elucidate the redox-active centers
of the FeMoco cluster and provide insight into the relationship between
the cryoreduced and native turnover states. Finally, 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy is used to reconcile the past and
present observations of reduced FeMoco.
Materials and Methods
Materials and Protein Purifications
All reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or
Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ) and used without further purification.
Ar and N2 gases were purchased from Air Liquide America
Specialty Gases LLC (Plumsteadville, PA) and passed through an activated
Cu catalyst to remove any traces of dioxygen before use. Azotobacter
vinelandii strains DJ995 (wild-type MoFe protein with a His
tag) and DJ 884 (wild-type FeP protein) were grown, and the corresponding
His-tagged MoFe and FeP proteins were expressed and purified as described
previously.[49] The protein concentrations
were determined by Biuret assay. The purities of these proteins were
>95% based on sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
analysis with Coomassie staining. The MoFe and Fe proteins were fully
active with specific activities. All manipulations of the proteins
and buffers were performed in septum-sealed serum vials under an Ar
atmosphere or on a Schlenk vacuum line. All liquids were transferred
using gastight syringes.
Preparation of Cryoreduced Samples
Samples prepared for irradiation consisted of 520 μM MoFe in
100 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS),
200 mM NaCl, and 20 mM sodium dithionite at pH 7.3 with 5% glycerol
by volume. All samples in XAS sample holders were frozen and stored
in liquid nitrogen before cryoreduction and further measurements.
γ irradiation of the N2ase samples at 77 K was performed for
approximately 6 h at a time (5 kGy h–1 for a 30
kGy total dose) using a Gammacell 220 60Co source. Annealing
at 200 K was performed by placing samples in a liquid N2/pentane bath (cooled to 200 K) for 2 min, followed by refreezing
in liquid N2. Reduction of E0 was monitored
via EPR by reduction in the amplitude of the E0S = 3/2 signal at gmax = 4.34. Cryoreduced samples are denoted in the following
text by their dose and annealing temperature (if annealed). For example,
“30 kGy” refers to an unannealed sample of MoFe, which
has been exposed to 30 kGy of radiation, while “30 kGy, 200
K” refers to a sample that has been irradiated with 30 kGy
of radiation, followed by annealing at 200 K for 2 min.
Preparation
of Native Turnover Samples
All native turnover XAS samples
were prepared in a 200 mM MOPS buffer at pH 7.3 with an MgATP regeneration
system (12 mM MgCl2, 20 mM phosphocreatine, 10 mM ATP,
1 mg mL–1 bovine serum albumin, and 0.4 mg mL–1 creatine phosphokinase), 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium
dithionite, and 5% (v/v) glycerol under Ar. The MoFe protein was added
to a final concentration of 400 μM, and the reaction was initiated
by the addition of FeP protein to a final concentration of 8 μM.
After incubation at room temperature for about 10 min, the reaction
mixture was transferred into the XAS sample holder and freeze-quenched
in liquid N2. Samples were stored and shipped in liquid
N2.
EPR Measurements
EPR spectra were
recorded using a Bruker X-band ESP 300 spectrometer with an Oxford
Instruments ESR 900 continuous-flow cryostat at 10 K. Quantitation
of E0 reduction was performed by measuring the decrease
in the intensity of the g1 feature at
4.34 of reduced samples relative to that of the resting state (see
section S2 of the Supporting Information for measurements performed on the samples used for XAS measurements).
This is possible because the intrinsic line width of the E0S = 3/2 signal and measurement
conditions for each of these samples were identical. These results
are corroborated by spin-integration (Table S1).
HERFD XAS Measurements
HERFD XAS data of all N2ase
samples were obtained at the ID26 beamline at the European Synchrotron
Radiation Facility (ESRF). The storage ring operated at 6 GeV in 16-bunch
top-up mode and ∼90 mA ring current. A double-crystal monochromator
using Si(311) crystals was used to select the incoming X-ray energy
with an intrinsic resolution (ΔE/E) of 0.3 × 10–4. A liquid-He-flow cryostat
was maintained at approximately 20 K in order to minimize radiation
damage and to maintain an inert sample environment. A 1-m-radius multicrystal
Johann-type X-ray spectrometer was used to select the energy of the
emitted X-rays and record HERFD XAS data using a dead-time-corrected
Ketek Si drift diode detector in a Rowland geometry. Standard XAS
was also collected by total fluorescence yield simultaneously with
HERFD measurements.In the Mo XAS measurements, the energy of
the incoming X-rays was calibrated by recording the transmission K-edge
XAS spectrum of a Mo foil and assigning the energy of the maximum
of the white line to 20016.4 eV. For Mo Kα HERFD measurements,
the spectrometer was equipped with five curved Ge(111) crystals positioned
at a Bragg angle of 77.74°, utilizing the [999] reflection to
focus the Mo Kα1 emission (∼17480 eV) on the
detector. Short XAS scans were collected by scanning the incident
energy from 19990 to 20090 eV, while long XAS scans obtained for normalization
were collected from 19910 to 20910 eV. Prior to measurements, each
sample was checked for signs of radiation damage by performing subsequent
short XAS scans from 19990 to 20090 eV on the same sample spot, using
a rate of 5 s per scan. These tests showed that MoFe was stable under
X-ray irradiation at the Mo K-edge for >300 s.All Fe XAS
measurements were calibrated by aligning the first inflection point
of the HERFD XAS spectrum of a 10-μm-thick α-Fe foil layered
in Kapton tape to 7111.2 eV. The spectrometer was equipped with five
curved Ge(110) crystals positioned in a Roland geometry at a Bragg
angle of ∼68°, using the [440] reflection to focus the
Fe Kα1 emission (7467 eV) on the detector. Short
XAS scans were collected by scanning the incident energy from 7100
to 7200 eV, while long XAS scans obtained for normalization were collected
from 6930 to 7920 eV. Prior to measurements, each sample was checked
for signs of radiation damage by performing subsequent short XAS scans
from 7100 to 7200 eV on the same sample spot, using a rate of 5 s
per scan. These tests showed that MoFe was stable under X-ray irradiation
at the Fe K-edge for up to 120 s.
PFY XAS Measurements
XAS measurements of intact N2ase MoFe and Fe proteins were obtained
at the 9-3 beamline of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource
(SSRL). The SPEAR storage ring operated at 3.0 GeV in a top-off mode
with a 500 mA ring current. A liquid-N2-cooled double-crystal
monochromator using Si(220) crystals at ϕ = 0° was used
to select the incoming X-ray energy with an intrinsic resolution (ΔE/E) of 0.6 × 10–4, and a Rh-coated mirror was used for harmonic rejection. The X-ray
beam size was 1 × 4 mm2 (V × H) at the sample position. A liquid-He-flow cryostat was
used to maintain at approximately 20 K sample environment in order
to prevent radiation damage and maintain an inert sample environment.
Fluorescence measurements were recorded using a Canberra 100-element
Ge monolith solid-state detector. Prior to measurements, each sample
was checked for signs of radiation damage by performing subsequent
5 min scans over the same sample spot. These tests showed that MoFe
was stable under X-ray irradiation at the Mo K-edge for >90 min
and at the Fe K-edge for >70 min.Energy calibrations for
the Mo and Fe K-edge XAS measurements were performed by recording
the transmission K-edge XAS spectra of Mo and Fe foils, respectively,
and assigning their energies, as detailed above in the HERFD XAS Measurements section. Full XAS scans
at the Mo K-edge were collected by scanning the incident energy from
19780 to 21142 eV. All Fe XAS scans were collected by scanning the
incident energy from 6882 to 8093 eV. Calibrations for each individual
scan at both Mo and Fe K-edges were recorded simultaneously by measurements
of the transmission of the respective metal foils.
XAS Data Processing
For all HERFD experiments, individual scans were normalized to
the incident photon flux and averaged using PyMCA.[50] Further processing of all spectra, including background
subtraction and normalization, was performed using the Athena program from the software package Demeter,[51] following standard protocols for X-ray spectroscopy.[52,53] Background subtraction and normalization of the averaged Mo XAS
spectra was performed using a linear regression for the preedge region
of 19910–19947 eV and a quadratic polynomial regression for
the postedge region of 20157–20807 eV. The Fe XAS spectra were
processed in a fashion similar to that of the Mo XAS spectra. Background
subtraction and normalization were performed using a linear regression
for the preedge region of 6990–7005 eV and a quadratic polynomial
regression for the postedge region of 7160–8200 eV. Statistical
analyses of XAS measurements were performed by normalization of individual
scans based on the edge area, followed by calculation of the standard
deviation based on the deviation of individual scans from the average
of all scans (eq ).where σ is the standard deviation, xi is an individual scan, xav is the average
over all scans, and j is the total number of scans.All spectral subtractions and manipulations were performed using
normalized spectra. All XAS spectra in the main text are presented
as “pure” spectra, in which contributions from the remaining
resting (E0) state MoFe have been subtracted from the observed
spectrum and the resulting spectrum of the “pure” species
has been renormalized. The amount of remaining E0 in a
given sample is based on the relative intensity of the E0S = 3/2 signal (as determined
by EPR) relative to that of the resting state. Standard errors resulting
from spectral subtractions involving removal of the resting state
E0 contribution were propagated using eq :where σ is the standard deviation of the renormalized
spectrum generated by the subtraction of fraction xb of spectrum “b” from spectrum “a”.
In all cases, xa = 1. Where difference
spectra are presented, in which x = 1, eq simplifies
to
57Fe Mössbauer
Spectroscopy Measurements
57Fe Mössbauer
spectra were recorded with a spectrometer using a Janis Research (Wilmington,
MA) SuperVaritemp dewar, which allows studies in applied magnetic
fields up to 8.0 T in a temperature range of 1.5–200 K. Isomer
shifts are quoted relative to the α-Fe metal at 298 K. Mössbauer
spectral simulations were performed using the local program mf (available from E.B.) using the minimum number of necessary
quadrupole doublets to gauge the average isomer shift of each spectrum.
The preparation of the resting state 57Fe Mössbauer
sample was previously described.[46]
Results
EPR
During turnover in the absence
of N2, the enzyme only accesses the E0–E4 states while generating H2, as depicted in Scheme . The EPR signals
from the several E2 and E4 states are well characterized.[4,37,38] Therefore, any intensity that
is unaccounted for in the continuous-wave (CW) EPR when comparing
samples of the resting E0 state and a turnover state can
be associated with population of the E1 and E3 states. In the present study, low-electron flux conditions (enabled
by a high [MoFe]:[FeP] ratio) have slowed reduction of the cluster
to the point that the rate of H2 production from E2 is greater than the rate of E2 formation. This
results in the population of only the E0 and E1 states, as confirmed by the absence of signals associated with the
E2 state in any of the samples used in the present study
(Figure S1).[45,54]Cryoradiolysis
at 77 K has previously been found to not only reduce the FeMoco cluster
but also partially oxidize the P cluster despite the presence of glycerol,
which favors the former.[45]Figure shows the persistence of the S = 1/2 signal (g = 2.05, 1.95, and 1.81)[55] corresponding
to P+ in the cryoreduced samples, even after annealing
at 200 K. The contribution of P+ can be roughly quantified
based on the intensity of this feature relative to the S = 3/2 E0 signal (see section S2
of the Supporting Information for details).
In doing so, we find that approximately 7% of the P cluster is oxidized
in the irradiated samples.
Figure 1
X-band CW EPR spectra of resting MoFe (E0), 30 kGy cryoreduced, and 30 kGy, 200 K annealed samples.
The g ∼ 2 region of the 30 kGy spectrum is
abbreviated because of the presence of large radical signals; these
arise from free radicals generated by the irradiation procedure. Measurements
were performed at 10 K, 9.371 GHz using a power of 2 mW and a 13 G
modulation amplitude.
X-band CW EPR spectra of resting MoFe (E0), 30 kGy cryoreduced, and 30 kGy, 200 K annealed samples.
The g ∼ 2 region of the 30 kGy spectrum is
abbreviated because of the presence of large radical signals; these
arise from free radicals generated by the irradiation procedure. Measurements
were performed at 10 K, 9.371 GHz using a power of 2 mW and a 13 G
modulation amplitude.On the basis of such
intensity measurements, samples trapped during turnover under Ar contain
∼55% E0, and the remaining ∼45% is assigned
to E1, while resting-state samples cryoreduced with 30
kGy contain ∼60% E0 (and, therefore, ∼40%
E1) and ∼7% P+ (Table S1).
Mo Kα HERFD XAS
A discussion
of the changes that occur at the Mo K-edge upon reduction is provided
in section S3 of the Supporting Information and demonstrated with a series of model complexes. Briefly, a one-electron
reduction of MoIII is expected to result in a ∼
1 eV decrease in energy of the edge, while the some variation in the
preedge region is expected to occur depending on competing factors
of centrosymmetry versus a reduced number of available holes in the
valence shell.[56] Upon inspection of Figure , we find that no
significant changes occur in the Mo spectrum of MoFe during either
native turnover (E1), following cryoreduction (30 and 60
kGy), or annealing of the cryoreduced sample (30 kGy, 200 K). While
some slight variation occurs in the edge around 20010 eV, these changes
are well within the standard error of the experiment (Figure S5) and not of the appropriate magnitude
to substantiate an oxidation state change at Mo. Hence, in E0, natively reduced, and cryoreduced MoFe samples, Mo remains MoIII.
Figure 2
Comparison of the normalized Mo Kα HERFD XAS spectra of the
MoFe samples under investigation. All XAS spectra (besides E0) are presented as renormalized “pure” species, in
which any remaining E0 component (as determined by EPR,
see section S2 of the Supporting Information) has been subtracted from the experimentally observed spectrum.
Prior to any spectral subtractions, an 11-point boxcar average smoothing
was applied.
Comparison of the normalized Mo Kα HERFD XAS spectra of the
MoFe samples under investigation. All XAS spectra (besides E0) are presented as renormalized “pure” species, in
which any remaining E0 component (as determined by EPR,
see section S2 of the Supporting Information) has been subtracted from the experimentally observed spectrum.
Prior to any spectral subtractions, an 11-point boxcar average smoothing
was applied.
Fe K-Edge XAS Considerations
Because XAS is a bulk technique and there are up to three unique
Fe–S clusters present in these samples, it is naturally necessary
to determine whether spectral changes that occur upon reduction are
attributable to the FeMoco cluster, P-cluster, FeP, or some combination.
During native turnover, single-electron transfer is accomplished in
a stepwise fashion that is initiated by the binding of the reduced,
ATP-bound form of the Fe N2ase protein (FePred). This binding
event induces a conformationally gated one-electron transfer from
the P-cluster to FeMoco, followed by the a one-electron transfer from
FePred to P+ in what is referred to as a “deficit
spending” electron-transfer process.[57,58] This is followed by hydrolysis of ATP to ADP, the release of two
Pi, and subsequent dissociation of FePox.[59] This series can be summarized as follows:Backfilling electron transfer from FePred to P+ occurs rapidly relative to the transfer from P to FeMoco.[57] Therefore, under native turnover conditions,
the bulk oxidation state of the P cluster remains invariant. In the
native turnover samples used here, a 50:1 ratio of [MoFe]/[FeP] is
used. Hence, FeP accounts for just 0.27% of the total Fe in these
samples, and therefore the contribution of either FePred or FePox to the native turnover spectrum is negligible.The cryoreduced samples lack FeP but exhibit the presence of a
relatively small quantity of a one-electron-oxidized P cluster. Previous
XAS studies of Pox have shown this species to have a decreased
white-line intensity relative to PN between 7122 and 7132
eV, as well as small increases in the intensity at both the preedge
and edge (Figure S20).[60]
Fe Kα HERFD and PFY
The Fe
Kα HERFD of MoFe under cryoreducing conditions is provided in
section S4 of the Supporting Information. Briefly, cryoreduction only results in minor increases in the intensity
of the white-line region from 7125 to 7135 eV of approximately 1.2–2%
of the total normalized intensity (Figure S4) when observed with this technique. This small degree of change
is not surprising because 15 unique Fe centers contribute to MoFe,
and formally we expect a single-oxidation-state change for one of
these centers. On the basis of studies of model complexes and comparisons
of the VFe and MoFe proteins, a white-line increase between 0.5 and
10% can be anticipated.[61] This is also
discussed in greater detail in section S4 of the Supporting Information.One of the powerful advantages
of HERFD XAS lies in its line-sharpening effect, a result of the narrow
experimental energy bandwidth approaching that of the intrinsic lifetime
broadening of the fluorescent event being observed.[62,63] This is particularly useful for measurements of elements with larger Z (such as Mo), which have shorter 1s core–hole lifetimes
and therefore greater lifetime broadening (as demonstrated in Figure S6).[64] While
line sharpening also occurs at Fe, it is less pronounced because of
its longer core–hole lifetime.Meanwhile, one of the
primary disadvantages of HERFD is its utilization
of an intrinsically small solid angle; this is necessary to select
the very narrow range of fluorescent energies used in detection at
the Kα line.[65] This means that the
amount of signal observed in HERFD measurements is usually quite low,
making an intense, high-flux incoming X-ray beam necessary to produce
substantial count rates. In turn, rapid scan times must be used to
mitigate the damage that such a high-flux incident beam inflicts on
the sample.[52] When this is combined with
the low count rates, which result from dilute protein solutions, the
level of noise in individual scans becomes considerable. In the present
case, despite extensive collection times, the statistical uncertainty
in these spectra remains considerably greater than the small differences
observed between the resting and cryoreduced/annealed samples. Figure S9 provides the difference spectra of
the 30 and 60 kGy samples, where the standard error of these experiments
ranges around ±2–3%.To overcome the challenges
presented when observing such a small degree of change (again, 1.2–2%),
we elected to employ standard Fe K-edge PFY XAS to provide insight
into the relationship between the resting, cryoreduced, and natively
reduced systems. PFY XAS measurements utilize a larger solid angle
and collect emitted fluorescent photons over a much larger range of
energies, providing approximately an order of magnitude higher count
rates than those observed by HERFD for similar samples. Additionally,
significantly longer dwell times (30 min per scan) can be used for
these measurements because of the use of a lower-flux incident beam
distributed over a significantly larger spot size. This allows for
data collection to be performed to a much higher confidence level,
with up to several orders of magnitude reduction in standard deviation.The Mo K-edge PFY XAS spectrum (Figure S7) shows no significant changes at the edge under any of the employed
conditions, in agreement with the collected Mo Kα HERFD. The
Fe K-edge PFY XAS measurements demonstrate a small degree of change
similar to those observed using Fe Kα HERFD, on the order of
up to 1.5% in the case of E1 (Figure ). However, the drastic decrease in the standard
error of these measurements makes such minor changes statistically
significant (Figures and S10–S13).
Figure 3
(Top) Comparison the
Fe K-edge PFY XAS spectra of resting E0 (violet), E1 (green), 30 kGy, 200 K (red), and 30 kGy (black). (Bottom)
Difference spectra generated by subtraction of the E0 spectrum
from the E1 (green), 30 kGy (black), and 30 kGy, 200 K
(red) spectra.
Figure 4
Comparison of the difference spectra generated
by subtracting the Fe K-edge PFY spectrum of E0 from either
E1 (green) or 30 kGy, 200 K (red). Standard deviations
are shown as the partially transparent complimenting color. The 30
kGy spectrum is omitted here for clarity and is provided in section
S4 of the Supporting Information.
(Top) Comparison the
Fe K-edge PFY XAS spectra of resting E0 (violet), E1 (green), 30 kGy, 200 K (red), and 30 kGy (black). (Bottom)
Difference spectra generated by subtraction of the E0 spectrum
from the E1 (green), 30 kGy (black), and 30 kGy, 200 K
(red) spectra.Comparison of the difference spectra generated
by subtracting the Fe K-edge PFY spectrum of E0 from either
E1 (green) or 30 kGy, 200 K (red). Standard deviations
are shown as the partially transparent complimenting color. The 30
kGy spectrum is omitted here for clarity and is provided in section
S4 of the Supporting Information.Changes are observed in three regions of the spectrum
upon native reduction of MoFe from the E0 to E1 state. Namely, a decrease in the preedge intensity from ∼7109
to 7113 eV is accompanied by a decrease in the edge intensity from
7113 to 7123 eV and an increase at the white line above 7123 eV. The
difference spectrum of E1 – E0 provides
a reference for the changes expected in the spectra following both
reduction and proton transfer, which can now be used to analyze the
spectra resulting from the cryoreduction and annealing of MoFe.As discussed above, the cryoreduction of MoFe also results in partial
oxidation of the P cluster. Therefore, all presented cryoreduced XAS
spectra are convoluted to some degree by the partial population of
P+. The Fe K-edge PFY XAS spectrum of Pox was
previously reported[60] and displayed a decrease
in the white-line intensity, which was combined with a small increase
in the intensity of both the preedge of ∼7112 eV and the edge
around 7120 eV (Figure S20). These changes
are essentially counteractive to the differences observed in the E1 spectrum, particularly at the white line.
Therefore, it is not surprising that the 30 kGy cryoreduced sample
exhibits only a small decrease in the edge intensity and a small increase
in intensity at the white line, with no appreciable change at the
preedge region. Upon annealing at 200 K, a decrease in the preedge
intensity is observed along with a further decrease in the edge intensity
to produce a spectrum similar to that of the native E1 sample
(as illustrated in Figure S15).
57Fe Mössbauer Spectroscopy
To reconcile our current
results from Fe XAS with those of the previous 57Fe Mössbauer
spectroscopy of cryoreduced and natively reduced MoFe,[46] we reinvestigated the 57Fe Mössbauer
spectroscopy of cryoreduced MoFe to see if the cryoreduction/annealing
protocol would reproduce the original isomer shift observed for the
E1 state. While the XAS measurements observed all Fe present in the sample, 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy only observed 57Fe. Selective enrichment of the
FeMoco cluster with 57Fe can be accomplished by enriching
MoFe with 57Fe, extracting the enriched 57FeMoco
cluster, and reconstituting this cluster into unenriched ΔnifB
FeMoco-deficient MoFe.[46,49] In this way, one can generate
a Mössbauer sample that is solely sensitive to the FeMoco cluster.
This was done previously,[46] and a sample
of selectively enriched 57FeMoco-enriched MoFe from this
original study was obtained and measured in the resting, cryoreduced,
and cryoreduced/200 K annealed states to gauge the change in the average
isomer shift (δavg), and therefore Fe oxidation state,
in these three states.It is not surprising that very little
change is observed between these three states, shown in Figure , because only a single-oxidation-state
change at one of the seven Fe sites of FeMoco is expected. However,
these small changes can still be quantified through fitting. A unique fit of the 57Fe Mössbauer spectra
of the FeMoco cluster requires a considerable amount of information
that is currently unavailable for E1, including an approximation
of the individual Fe hyperfine tensors and their Euler angles. However,
the average isomer shifts can still be obtained from the collapsed
quadrupole spectra measured ∼90 K using a minimalist fitting
procedure to account for the absorption intensity (Figure S22). In this way, the spectra were adequately fit
using two quadrupole doublets for the E0 spectrum and three
for the 30 kGy and 30 kGy, 200 K spectra. The results of these fits
are summarized in Table .
Figure 5
Comparison of the experimental resting E0 (violet), 30
kGy (black), and 30 kGy, 200 K (red) 57Fe Mössbauer
spectra of a selectively 57FeMoco/56P-cluster-enriched
MoFe sample. On the basis of EPR, the 30 kGy and 30 kGy, 200 K spectra
contain ∼60% E0. The spectra were collected under
the following conditions: E0 (100 K, 0 T), 30 kGy (90 K,
0.1 T), and 30 kGy, 200 K (90 K, 0 T). Errors and difference spectra
are provided in section S6 of the Supporting Information.
Table 1
Summary of 57Fe Mössbauer Fits of E0, 30 kGy, and 30 kGy, 200
K Samplesa
E0
30 kGy
30 kGy, 200 K
bδ (mm/s)
0.38
0.41
0.39
cΔδavg
0.00
0.03
0.01
dΔδavg
0.00
0.07
0.02
The average
isomer shift of each species is formulated by the weighted average
of the isomer shifts of its individual components.
Discrepancies in the absolute isomer
shift of E0 between the present and previous studies arise
from the temperature-dependent second-order Doppler shift.[46]
Calculated
by subtraction of δ(E0).
Adjusted for the presence of E0 (in the present
samples, this was performed by multiplication of Δδavg by 2.5 to account for the ∼60% E0 present).
Comparison of the experimental resting E0 (violet), 30
kGy (black), and 30 kGy, 200 K (red) 57Fe Mössbauer
spectra of a selectively 57FeMoco/56P-cluster-enriched
MoFe sample. On the basis of EPR, the 30 kGy and 30 kGy, 200 K spectra
contain ∼60% E0. The spectra were collected under
the following conditions: E0 (100 K, 0 T), 30 kGy (90 K,
0.1 T), and 30 kGy, 200 K (90 K, 0 T). Errors and difference spectra
are provided in section S6 of the Supporting Information.The average
isomer shift of each species is formulated by the weighted average
of the isomer shifts of its individual components.Discrepancies in the absolute isomer
shift of E0 between the present and previous studies arise
from the temperature-dependent second-order Doppler shift.[46]Calculated
by subtraction of δ(E0).Adjusted for the presence of E0 (in the present
samples, this was performed by multiplication of Δδavg by 2.5 to account for the ∼60% E0 present).The observed changes in the
isomer shift are small but close to those expected based on previous
findings.[46] Once the presence of E0 in the 30 kGy and 30 kGy, 200 K samples is compensated for,
we find a shift of +0.07 mm s–1 upon moving from
E0 to 30 kGy. This is slightly greater than that previously
found for MI, where +0.05 mm s–1 was
observed with an unreported dose of radiation.[46] Upon annealing, the change in the isomer shift relative
to E0 is reduced to Δδavg = 0.02
mm s–1, similar to the previously reported species
MR (assigned as E1).[46]
Discussion
Context of the E1 Oxidation State
Few previous investigations have specifically
aimed at exploring the electronic and geometric structures of the
E1 state of MoFe, and no conclusive evidence has been provided
regarding the site of reduction on the FeMoco cluster in E1.[66,67] To this end, perhaps the most significant
effort undertaken to date involved the measurement of selectively 57FeMoco-enriched MoFe using 57Fe Mössbauer
spectroscopy to ascertain the electronic properties of the catalytic
cluster across a series of oxidation states.[46] More specifically, the one-electron-oxidized (Mox), resting
(MN), low-flux turnover (5:1 [MoFe]/[FeP], referred to
as “MR”), and cryoreduced (MI)
states were measured and their isomer shifts δ determined. The
isomer shift δ is diagnostic of Fe oxidation state, particularly
for similar or identical complexes in a series of oxidation states.
Considering that a typical change in the isomer shift (Δδ)
of ∼0.45 mm s–1 is observed upon moving from
ferric to ferrous FeS4, a change in the overall oxidation
state of −1 for the seven Fe sites found in FeMoco is expected
to produce an increase of 0.06 mm s–1 in the average
isomer shift. This was indeed observed upon a comparison of the MN and Mox states. Similarly, MI exhibited
a similar change of Δδ ≈ 0.05 mm s–1 relative to MN. However, a considerably smaller shift
was seen upon a comparison of MR and MN (Δδ
≈ 0.02 mm s–1). The discrepancy of Δδ
between MI and MR led to the proposal that MI represented a unique species and that the series moving from
Mox to MN to MI involved sequential
additions of electrons to the Fe centers of FeMoco. Meanwhile, the
smaller Δδ observed in MR was proposed, by
inference, to be a Mo reduced state.[46] These
results had significant implications, not only in that Mo, rather
than Fe, was reduced in the E1 state of MoFe but also in
that the method of reduction determined the identity of the resulting
species.At the time of the study, it was generally accepted
that the resting state of FeMoco contained MoIV based on
previous ENDOR and XAS studies,[68−71] reasonably suggesting that native reduction could
result in the formation of MoIII. More recently, however,
Mo Kα HERFD and L-edge XAS have been used to demonstrate that
the oxidation state of Mo in the resting E0 state of Mo
N2ase is best described as MoIII in a non-Hund electronic
configuration.[56,72] Therefore, if a Mo-centered reduction
does indeed occur upon the initial reduction of the FeMoco cluster,
a formal MoII center would be generated during native turnover.
Implications of Mo Redox Innocence
Because the Mo of FeMoco
is the only Mo site in MoFe, the changes expected to occur upon reduction
should be on the same order of magnitude as those observed upon comparison
to reference MoIV and MoIII, particularly in
terms of the change in energy of the preedge and edge features (−1
eV for a one-electron reduction; section S3 of the Supporting Information). From the present Mo Kα HERFD
XAS spectrum (Figure ), it is clear that no significant spectral changes occur at the
Mo site of MoFe during native low-flux turnover or upon cryoreduction,
which implies that Mo is not redox-active under the conditions utilized
in this study.Besides the implication of these results in assigning
the oxidation state of Mo, we note that observing no significant changes in the preedge region of the spectrum was initially
surprising based on the previous literature. More specifically, previous
reports of the Mo and Fe K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure
of MoFe under native turnover proposed that significant contractions
of the Mo–Fe and Mo–O/N distances of −0.06 and
−0.07 Å were found for the E1 state.[67] It is already known that the Mo K-edge is fairly
sensitive to the coordination environment,[64,73] and one would anticipate that such drastic changes in the first
coordination sphere of Mo should result in noticeable changes in the
preedge/edge features when measured using Kα HERFD; however,
none are observed here, implying that Mo coordination does not change
upon formation of E1. Unfortunately, the near-edge spectra
(commonly referred to as XANES) were not reported in this previous
study.In a similar vein, it was hypothesized that homocitrate,
which binds the Mo of FeMoco in the resting state, plays an essential
role in proton relay to the FeMoco cluster during catalysis.[74] Computational studies on a model of the E4 state of FeMoco have suggested that Mo may shift from 6-
to 5-coordinate during turnover as the Mo-coordinating homocitrate
becomes protonated.[75] Lowering of coordination
would result in a lower approximate symmetry at Mo (from C2 to C1) and correspondingly
an increase in the XAS preedge intensity. We do not observe any such
changes presently, again suggesting that Mo remains 6-coordinate in
E1.
Fe K-Edge XAS of E1 and Cryoreduced
States
As indicated by the Fe K-edge PFY XAS spectra presented
in Figures and 4, reduction of E0 to E1 results
in a decrease in the intensity at both the preedge and edge regions
and an increase in the intensity at the white line. Generally, the
preedge feature of transitions metals with partially filled valence
orbitals is expected to weaken as the oxidation state is decreased,
assuming that no extreme perturbations in geometry or covalency occur.[76−78] It is well-established that fewer available holes in the metal d
shell can result in a decrease in the intensity of the preedge feature.
Thus, the results in Figures and 4 are indicative that the E1 state is generated through an Fe-centered reduction.The position of the edge is another typical diagnostic of the metal
oxidation state, which is expected to decrease in energy upon reduction
(for an example, see Figure S16). Therefore,
at face value the decreased intensity observed for E1 in
this region appears to indicate oxidation, which would contradict
the interpretation of the changes that occur in the preedge region.
However, there are several examples of FeS clusters that do not exhibit
a change in energy at the edge region upon reduction.[60,61,79] This is often attributed to the
high covalency of Fe–S bonds, where metal-centered oxidation
state changes can be muted through changes in the Fe–S covalency[79−81] However, whether or not a shift in the edge position occurs upon
reduction/oxidation of these systems also heavily depends on the mixed-valent
nature of the new state being generated. As an example, the oxidation
states at Fe in a symmetric [2Fe–2S]+ cluster may
appear as either 2Fe2.5+ or FeIII/FeII depending on the degree of mixed valency (as well as experimental
conditions in the case of Robin-Day class II[82] mixed-valent complexes). As a result, the edge of the XAS spectrum
may appear either halfway between that of the 2FeIII and
2FeII states (in the case of 2Fe2.5+) or as
a convolution of the 2FeIII and 2FeII states.
In the latter case, the position of the edge will be dominated by
the FeII center and will therefore appear at the same energy
as the 2FeII dimer. This behavior has been previously characterized
in the [Et4N][LFe2S2] (n = 1, 2, 3) series,[79] where the localized
mixed-valent character of the n = 2 species results
in the same edge energy as the n = 3 species in this
complex (Figure S19). This is nearly identical
with what we observe in Figures and 4 for the E1 state, rationalizing the observed decrease in the edge intensity
and further supporting an Fe-based reduction in E1.Last, the white-line region generally results from strongly allowed
electronic transitions that are confined to the vicinity of the absorbing
atom or low-energy continuum states confined by strong multiple scattering.
These states are difficult to predict and thus are less well understood
than the transitions that contribute to the preedge and edge regions.
However, this region can still be used as a fingerprint for the chemical
bonding, oxidation state, and three-dimensional environment of the
absorber. This region has been seen to increase in intensity with
decreasing oxidation state not only for FeP and the P cluster[60,80] but also in FeS model complexes.[61,79] The changes
that occur in the white line of the Fe XANES spectrum upon formation
of E1 are therefore also consistent with an Fe-centered
reduction.With our consideration of E1 formed during
native turnover in hand, we now turn to the cryoreduced species. Similar
to E1, a decrease in the edge intensity coupled with an
increase in the white-line intensity is seen in the 30 kGy sample,
albeit to a smaller degree. It is notable that there is no significant
decrease in the preedge intensity. Meanwhile, annealing of the 30
kGy cryoreduced sample results in a decreased preedge intensity, as
well as a further decrease in the edge intensity. This produces a
difference spectrum that is very similar to that of the E1 state (Figure ).
While some discrepancies do exist, particularly in the degree to which
the intensities of the preedge and edge are decreased, it is important
to keep in mind that ∼7% of the P cluster in these cryoreduced
samples is present as P+. On the basis of previous XAS
studies of PN/P+, any P+ present
is expected to increase the preedge and edge intensities, while significantly
decreasing the white-line intensity (Figure S20).[60] These contributions directly correlate
with the discrepancies between the E1 and 30 kGy, 200 K
samples. This further supports the hypothesis that the differences
between the cryoreduced and E1 states are not due to Fe
versus Mo reduction but instead to the fact that the cryoreduced state
has not yet acquired a proton (Scheme ).These results are further corroborated by
the 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy results. Similar
to the previously reported study of cryoreduced MoFe, we observe a
change in the isomer shift of Δδavg = 0.07
mm s–1 following cryoreduction using 30 kGy of radiation
once the remaining contributions of E0 are accounted for
(compared to the 0.05 mm s–1 produced using an unspecified
dose). Because there are seven Fe sites present in FeMoco, this corresponds
to a Δδavg = 0.49 mm s–1 at
a single Fe site, consistent with an Fe-centered reduction. This is
not intended to imply that this additional electron is fully delocalized
over all seven Fe sites. Annealing of this sample at 200 K produces
a shift of Δδavg = 0.02 mm s–1, identical with that observed previously for E1.[46] This is equivalent to a much smaller Δδavg = 0.14 mm s–1 shift for a single Fe site.
This considerably smaller shift is intriguing because it implies that
the additional electron contained in the E1 state is either
fairly delocalized, involved in a highly covalent interaction, or
both. Whether this can be attributed to iron hydride formation or
the protonation of one of the S atoms in FeMoco remains unclear. What
is perhaps clearer is that in either scenario the reducing equivalent
appears to be distributed in such a manner as to minimize the apparent
change in the oxidation state of the cluster, supporting the hypothesis
that protonation of the cluster serves to level its reduction potential.Thus far, the Fe K-edge XAS and 57Fe Mössbauer
spectroscopy results support that (a) E1 trapped during
turnover consists of an Fe-reduced state and (b) annealing of the
cryoreduced state produces E1. Why then does the E1 state appear more reduced in the Fe K-edge XAS, while the
cryoreduced state appears more reduced in the 57Fe Mössbauer
spectroscopy? This is partially explained by the presence of ∼7%
P+ in the cryoreduced samples that is observed in the XAS
but not in the Mössbauer spectroscopy. However, even though
the 30 kGy and 30 kGy, 200 K samples both contain the same contribution
from P+, the 30 kGy, 200 K sample still appears more reduced
in the XAS and less reduced in the Mössbauer spectroscopy.
This implies that more must occur at the FeMoco cluster to generate
E1 than simply the transfer of an electron and a proton;
rather, it appears that a degree of electronic reorganization is also
necessary. This kind of phenomenon has already been observed in previous
cryoreduction studies of MoFe, where cryoreduction of the samples
of E1 resulted in a unique S = 1/2 species rather than the S = 3/2 species of E2[45] and may very well occur here.
Conclusions
The present study has interrogated the behavior of both Mo and
Fe of MoFe under both low-flux turnover and cryoreducing conditions.
The results of the Mo Kα HERFD XAS demonstrate clearly that
one-electron reduction of MoFe does not result in a Mo-centered reduction
under either of these conditions. Fe K-edge XAS measurements further
demonstrate that an Fe-centered redox event occurs under both native
turnover and cryoreducing conditions, which is attributable to the
FeMoco cluster on the basis of EPR. The changes observed upon moving
from E0 to E1 are consistent with the one-electron
reduction of Fe at FeMoco. While only minor changes are observed in
the Fe K-edge XAS of MoFe following 30 kGy of irradiation, annealing
of this sample for 2 min at 200 K generates a species closely related
to E1. The differences between E1 and this cryoreduced/annealed
species is accounted for by the presence of P+ in the latter,
which is also generated during cryoreduction. These results are further
supported by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, where
the same change in the isomer shift Δδavg as
that previously reported for the E1 state is observed following
cryoreduction/annealing. On these bases, our results support the hypothesis
that the states of FeMoco in cryoreduced MoFe and natively reduced
E1 are related to one another through proton transfer.
Building from previous studies, we propose that the metal valencies
of the E1 state follow a [MoIII4FeII3FeIII] distribution.The present work provides
significant insight into the nature of the E1 state of
MoFe and clearly establishes the redox innocence of Mo in the reduction
of resting state (E0) N2ase to the E1 state.
This work demonstrates that Fe is reduced in the E1 state
and that both low-flux turnover and cryoreduction can function as
a route to populating this state. These results provide crucial information
for mechanistic studies in terms of possible electron distributions
and variation in the coordination environment of the metal centers
of the catalytic cluster and serve as a guide for further studies
regarding the precise nature of E1.
Authors: Robert Y Igarashi; Mikhail Laryukhin; Patricia C Dos Santos; Hong-In Lee; Dennis R Dean; Lance C Seefeldt; Brian M Hoffman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2005-05-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Brett M Barney; Mikhail Laryukhin; Robert Y Igarashi; Hong-In Lee; Patricia C Dos Santos; Tran-Chin Yang; Brian M Hoffman; Dennis R Dean; Lance C Seefeldt Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2005-06-07 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Brett M Barney; Robert Y Igarashi; Patricia C Dos Santos; Dennis R Dean; Lance C Seefeldt Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Lance C Seefeldt; Zhi-Yong Yang; Dmitriy A Lukoyanov; Derek F Harris; Dennis R Dean; Simone Raugei; Brian M Hoffman Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Dmitriy A Lukoyanov; Zhi-Yong Yang; Dennis R Dean; Lance C Seefeldt; Simone Raugei; Brian M Hoffman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Casey Van Stappen; Laure Decamps; George E Cutsail; Ragnar Bjornsson; Justin T Henthorn; James A Birrell; Serena DeBeer Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Sayanti Chatterjee; Ingolf Harden; Giovanni Bistoni; Rebeca G Castillo; Sonia Chabbra; Maurice van Gastel; Alexander Schnegg; Eckhard Bill; James A Birrell; Bill Morandi; Frank Neese; Serena DeBeer Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 15.419