| Literature DB >> 30909423 |
Taek Lee1, Jae-Hyuk Ahn2, Jinha Choi3, Yeonju Lee4, Jin-Myung Kim5, Chulhwan Park6, Hongje Jang7, Tae-Hyung Kim8, Min-Ho Lee9.
Abstract
During the last 30 years, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported a gradual increase in the number of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), not only in developed but also in developing countries. In particular, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the severe CVDs because of the high death rate, damage to the body, and various complications. During these harmful effects, rapid diagnosis of AMI is key for saving patients with CVD in an emergency. The prompt diagnosis and proper treatment of patients with AMI are important to increase the survival rate of these patients. To treat patients with AMI quickly, detection of a CVD biomarker at an ultra-low concentration is essential. Cardiac troponins (cTNs), cardiac myoglobin (cMB), and creatine kinase MB are typical biomarkers for AMI detection. An increase in the levels of those biomarkers in blood implies damage to cardiomyocytes and thus is related to AMI progression. In particular, cTNs are regarded as a gold standard biomarker for AMI diagnosis. The conventional TN detection system for detection of AMI requires long measurement time and is labor-intensive and tedious. Therefore, the demand for sensitive and selective TN detection techniques is increasing at present. To meet this demand, several approaches and methods have been applied to develop a TN detection system based on a nanostructure. In the present review, the authors reviewed recent advances in TN biosensors with a focus on four detection systems: (1) An electrochemical (EC) TN nanobiosensor, (2) field effect transistor (FET)-based TN nanobiosensor, (3) surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based TN nanobiosensor and (4) surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-based TN nanobiosensor.Entities:
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; cardiac troponin detection system; electrochemical; field effect transistor; nanostructure; surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy; surface plasmon resonance
Year: 2019 PMID: 30909423 PMCID: PMC6470505 DOI: 10.3390/mi10030203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1(A) Schematic diagram of the electrochemical (EC)-based troponin (TNI) biosensor consisted of DNA 3WJ/Au nanospike on Au micro-gap/PCB system, (B) reduction potential of the fabricated biosensor to various concentrations of TNI in HEPES (2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid) buffer and human serum (0 pM to 100 nM), (C) reduction potential of the fabricated biosensor to various target proteins in the HEPES buffer (TNI, Hemocyanin, Myoglobin, Hemoglobin, Albumin). (Reproduced with permission from the authors of reference [38], published by Elsevier, 2019).
Figure 2(A) Schematic illustration of the AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMT) sensor consisting of a gate electrode opening and channel opening separated by a fixed distance. (B) Potential distribution across the solution when gate voltage and transistor bias are applied. (C) Illustration of the charge distribution in the electric-double layer (EDL) gated HEMT structure when the receptor is immobilized on the gate electrode area. (D) Current versus time graph for the aptamer based detection of TNI in clinical human serum samples [61].
Comparison of the electrochemical (EC)-based biosensor and field-effect transistor (FET)-based for TN detection in terms of the bioprobe, detection method, detection limit, and nanostructure.
| Bioprobe | Detection Method | Detection Limit | Nanostructure | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody | CV/EIS | 0.2 ng/mL | Carbon nanofiber | [ |
| Antibody | CV/EIS | 24 pg/mL | Gold nanoparticle | [ |
| Aptamer | CA | 24 pg/mL (1 pM) | Fc-modified silica nanoparticle | [ |
| Aptamer | DPV | 8 pg/mL | Au nanodumbbells | [ |
| Aptamer | CV | 24 pg/mL (1 pM) | Au nanospike | [ |
| Antibody | Direct electrical detection | 5 pg/mL (cTnI) | Silicon nanowires | [ |
| Antibody | Sandwich immunoassay, Electrical detection | 1 pg/mL (cTnI) | Indium oxide (In2O3) Nanoribbons | [ |
| Antibody | Direct electrical detection | 1 nM (cTnT) | Silicon nanowires | [ |
| Aptamer | Direct electrical detection | 10 μg/mL (cTnT) | Zinc oxide (ZnO) thin film | [ |
| Antibody, Aptamer | Electric-double layer, Direct electrical detection | 6 pg/mL (cTnI) | AlGaN/GaN nanoribbons | [ |
Figure 3(A) Schematic presentation of fabrication steps involved with regenerable LSPR nano-immunoassay and its reversible working mode of action at 25 and 37 °C. (B) UV-NIR spectra of GNR-anti-TnT-PNIPAAM LSPR nano-immunoassay when 5 ng/mL TnT solution was treated at 37 °C (associated) and 25 °C (dissociated). (C) Regeneration of the GNR-anti-TnTPNIPAAM LSPR nano-immunoassay at 37 °C and 25 °C when a 5 ng/mL solution was used. (Reproduced with permission from the authors of reference [77], the figure has followed the terms of use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.).
Figure 4SERS-based immunoassay biosensors using nanoparticles for sensitive detection. (A) Competitive immunoassay of TN and CK-MB markers using magnetic microparticles and gold nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission from [96]. Copyright 2014, Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Bimetallic (gold and silver) nanostars and gold-silver nanoarray for inducing of the hot field related to the SERS effect and highly sensitive detection of the TN. Reproduced with permission from [97]. Copyright 2018, ACS Publications.
Comparison of the SPR-based TN biosensor and SERS-based TN biosensor in terms of the bioprobe, detection method, detection limit, and nanostructure.
| Bioprobe | Detection Method | Detection Limit | Nanostructure | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody | SPR | 1.25 ng/mL | Magnetic multi-walled carbon nano-tubes(MMWCNTs)/Hollow gold nanoparticles(HGNPs) | [ |
| Antibody | SPR | 68 ng/L | - | [ |
| Antibody | LSPR | 7.6 fg/mL | Gold nanorod | [ |
| Antibody | SPR | 0.5 ng/mL | Gold nanoparticle | [ |
| Antibody | SPR | 0.05 ng/mL | - | [ |
| Antibody | SPR | 100 ng/mL | Gold nanorod | [ |
| Antibody | SERS | 33.7 pg/mL | Magnetic microparticle/Gold nanoparticle | [ |
| Antibody | SERS | 0.76 pg/Ml | Bimetallic nanostar (gold-silver)/Gold-silver nanoarray | [ |
| Antibody | SERS | 5 pg/mL | Graphene oxide/Gold nanoparticle/Magnetic microparticle | [ |
| Antibody | SERS | 12.9 fM | Magnetic microparticle/Silver nanoparticle | [ |
| Antibody | Lateral immunoassay, SERS | 1 ng/mL | Gold nanoparticle | [ |
| Antibody | Lateral immunoassay, SERS | 0.44 pg/mL | Silver-gold core-shell nanoparticle | [ |
| Antibody | Lateral immunoassay, SERS | 0.89 pg/mL | Silver-gold core-shell nanoparticle | [ |