Literature DB >> 16814641

Biomarkers in acute cardiac disease: the present and the future.

Allan S Jaffe1, Luciano Babuin, Fred S Apple.   

Abstract

The use of biomarkers to aid diagnosis and treatment is increasing rapidly as genomics and proteomics help us expand the number of markers we can use and as an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of cardiac disease guides their use. However, as with all rapidly expanding fields, there is the risk of excessive enthusiasm unless we are circumspect about the data that guide the clinical use of these new tools. This review focuses first on how to use troponin, which at present is the best validated of the new markers, and will hopefully provide insight into how to use this biomarker more productively by distinguishing subsets of patients and by providing an understanding of the meaning of elevations in various clinical situations. The review then discusses the use as well as the knowledge gaps associated with emerging biomarkers such as B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein, which are increasingly moving toward more productive clinical use. Finally, it reflects on some of the large number of markers that are still in development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16814641     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  95 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cardiovascular disease before kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Sneha Palepu; G V Ramesh Prasad
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2015-12-24

2.  Nonsymptomatic myocardial injury after radiofrequency and cryoablation: a study of children and patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Joachim C Will; Ting-Liang Liu; Eleftheria Panagiotou; Bernd Opgen-Rhein; Lothar Schmitz; Felix Berger
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry Measurement of Aminotransferase Activity.

Authors:  Xin Yan; Xin Li; Chengsen Zhang; Yang Xu; R Graham Cooks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Do we really need another biomarker to diagnose myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

Authors:  Jeffrey J Rade; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  New methods for improved evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department.

Authors:  U Ekelund; J L Forberg
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Can cardiac troponin T level be used to predict survival of patients awaiting renal transplantation?

Authors:  Martha Pavlakis
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-27

7.  Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of heart-type fatty acid binding protein in the BWH-TIMI ED chest pain study.

Authors:  Christian T Ruff; Marc P Bonaca; Joshua M Kosowsky; Michael J Conrad; Sabina A Murphy; Petr Jarolim; Sean M Donahoe; Michelle L O'Donoghue; David A Morrow
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Cardiac troponin T determination by a highly sensitive assay in postmortem serum and pericardial fluid.

Authors:  Lucas González-Herrera; Aurora Valenzuela; Valentín Ramos; Antonia Blázquez; Enrique Villanueva
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 9.  Universal MI definition update for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Harvey White; Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan Jaffe
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Effect of hemodialysis on traditional and innovative cardiac markers.

Authors:  Martina Montagnana; Giuseppe Lippi; Nicola Tessitore; Gian Luca Salvagno; Giovanni Targher; Matteo Gelati; Antonio Lupo; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.