PURPOSE: To build and evaluate a small-footprint, lightweight, high-performance 3T MRI scanner for advanced brain imaging with image quality that is equal to or better than conventional whole-body clinical 3T MRI scanners, while achieving substantial reductions in installation costs. METHODS: A conduction-cooled magnet was developed that uses less than 12 liters of liquid helium in a gas-charged sealed system, and standard NbTi wire, and weighs approximately 2000 kg. A 42-cm inner-diameter gradient coil with asymmetric transverse axes was developed to provide patient access for head and extremity exams, while minimizing magnet-gradient interactions that adversely affect image quality. The gradient coil was designed to achieve simultaneous operation of 80-mT/m peak gradient amplitude at a slew rate of 700 T/m/s on each gradient axis using readily available 1-MVA gradient drivers. RESULTS: In a comparison of anatomical imaging in 16 patients using T2 -weighted 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) between the compact 3T and whole-body 3T, image quality was assessed as equivalent to or better across several metrics. The ability to fully use a high slew rate of 700 T/m/s simultaneously with 80-mT/m maximum gradient amplitude resulted in improvements in image quality across EPI, DWI, and anatomical imaging of the brain. CONCLUSIONS: The compact 3T MRI system has been in continuous operation at the Mayo Clinic since March 2016. To date, over 200 patient studies have been completed, including 96 comparison studies with a clinical 3T whole-body MRI. The increased gradient performance has reliably resulted in consistently improved image quality.
PURPOSE: To build and evaluate a small-footprint, lightweight, high-performance 3T MRI scanner for advanced brain imaging with image quality that is equal to or better than conventional whole-body clinical 3T MRI scanners, while achieving substantial reductions in installation costs. METHODS: A conduction-cooled magnet was developed that uses less than 12 liters of liquid helium in a gas-charged sealed system, and standard NbTi wire, and weighs approximately 2000 kg. A 42-cm inner-diameter gradient coil with asymmetric transverse axes was developed to provide patient access for head and extremity exams, while minimizing magnet-gradient interactions that adversely affect image quality. The gradient coil was designed to achieve simultaneous operation of 80-mT/m peak gradient amplitude at a slew rate of 700 T/m/s on each gradient axis using readily available 1-MVA gradient drivers. RESULTS: In a comparison of anatomical imaging in 16 patients using T2 -weighted 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) between the compact 3T and whole-body 3T, image quality was assessed as equivalent to or better across several metrics. The ability to fully use a high slew rate of 700 T/m/s simultaneously with 80-mT/m maximum gradient amplitude resulted in improvements in image quality across EPI, DWI, and anatomical imaging of the brain. CONCLUSIONS: The compact 3T MRI system has been in continuous operation at the Mayo Clinic since March 2016. To date, over 200 patient studies have been completed, including 96 comparison studies with a clinical 3T whole-body MRI. The increased gradient performance has reliably resulted in consistently improved image quality.
Authors: K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Nils Kickler; Wietske van der Zwaag; Ralf Mekle; Tobias Kober; Jose P Marques; Gunnar Krueger; Rolf Gruetter Journal: MAGMA Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Ek T Tan; Luca Marinelli; Zachary W Slavens; Kevin F King; Christopher J Hardy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ek T Tan; Seung-Kyun Lee; Paul T Weavers; Dominic Graziani; Joseph E Piel; Yunhong Shu; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein; Thomas K F Foo Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Seung-Kyun Lee; Jean-Baptiste Mathieu; Dominic Graziani; Joseph Piel; Eric Budesheim; Eric Fiveland; Christopher J Hardy; Ek Tsoon Tan; Bruce Amm; Thomas K-F Foo; Matt A Bernstein; John Huston; Yunhong Shu; John F Schenck Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: S Tao; J D Trzasko; J L Gunter; P T Weavers; Y Shu; J Huston; S K Lee; E T Tan; M A Bernstein Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Prantik Kundu; Valerie Voon; Priti Balchandani; Michael V Lombardo; Benedikt A Poser; Peter A Bandettini Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Myung-Ho In; Ek Tsoon Tan; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; Daehun Kang; Uten Yarach; Shengzhen Tao; Erin M Gray; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ek T Tan; Robert Y Shih; Jhimli Mitra; Tim Sprenger; Yihe Hua; Chitresh Bhushan; Matt A Bernstein; Jennifer A McNab; J Kevin DeMarco; Vincent B Ho; Thomas K F Foo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jonathan M Scott; Arvin Arani; Armando Manduca; Kiaran P McGee; Joshua D Trzasko; John Huston; Richard L Ehman; Matthew C Murphy Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Petrice M Cogswell; Joshua D Trzasko; Erin M Gray; Norbert G Campeau; Phillip J Rossman; Daehun Kang; Fraser Robb; Robert S Stormont; Scott A Lindsay; Matt A Bernstein; Kiaran P McGee; John Huston Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Yi Sui; Arvin Arani; Joshua D Trzasko; Matthew C Murphy; Phillip J Rossman; Kevin J Glaser; Kiaran P McGee; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz; John Huston Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ashley T Tao; Yunhong Shu; Ek T Tan; Joshua D Trzasko; Shengzhen Tao; Robert D Reid; Paul T Weavers; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Daehun Kang; Uten Yarach; Myung-Ho In; Erin M Gray; Joshua D Trzasko; Hang Joon Jo; Yunhong Shu; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ek T Tan; Yihe Hua; Eric W Fiveland; Mark E Vermilyea; Joseph E Piel; Keith J Park; Vincent B Ho; Thomas K F Foo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 4.668