Ek T Tan1,2, Robert Y Shih3,4, Jhimli Mitra1, Tim Sprenger5, Yihe Hua1, Chitresh Bhushan1, Matt A Bernstein6, Jennifer A McNab7, J Kevin DeMarco3,4, Vincent B Ho3,4, Thomas K F Foo1,3. 1. GE Research, Niskayuna, New York. 2. Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York. 3. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. GE Healthcare, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 7. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigate the importance of high gradient-amplitude and high slew-rate on oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) diffusion imaging for human brain imaging and evaluate human brain imaging with OGSE on the MAGNUS head-gradient insert (200 mT/m amplitude and 500 T/m/s slew rate). METHODS: Simulations with cosine-modulated and trapezoidal-cosine OGSE at various gradient amplitudes and slew rates were performed. Six healthy subjects were imaged with the MAGNUS gradient at 3T with OGSE at frequencies up to 100 Hz and b = 450 s/mm2 . Comparisons were made against standard pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE) diffusion in vivo and in an isotropic diffusion phantom. RESULTS: Simulations show that to achieve high frequency and b-value simultaneously for OGSE, high gradient amplitude, high slew rates, and high peripheral nerve stimulation limits are required. A strong linear trend for increased diffusivity (mean: 8-19%, radial: 9-27%, parallel: 8-15%) was observed in normal white matter with OGSE (20 Hz to 100 Hz) as compared to PGSE. Linear fitting to frequency provided excellent correlation, and using a short-range disorder model provided radial long-term diffusivities of D∞,MD = 911 ± 72 µm2 /s, D∞,PD = 1519 ± 164 µm2 /s, and D∞,RD = 640 ± 111 µm2 /s and correlation lengths of lc ,MD = 0.802 ± 0.156 µm, lc ,PD = 0.837 ± 0.172 µm, and lc ,RD = 0.780 ± 0.174 µm. Diffusivity changes with OGSE frequency were negligible in the phantom, as expected. CONCLUSION: The high gradient amplitude, high slew rate, and high peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds of the MAGNUS head-gradient enables OGSE acquisition for in vivo human brain imaging.
PURPOSE: We investigate the importance of high gradient-amplitude and high slew-rate on oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) diffusion imaging for human brain imaging and evaluate human brain imaging with OGSE on the MAGNUS head-gradient insert (200 mT/m amplitude and 500 T/m/s slew rate). METHODS: Simulations with cosine-modulated and trapezoidal-cosine OGSE at various gradient amplitudes and slew rates were performed. Six healthy subjects were imaged with the MAGNUS gradient at 3T with OGSE at frequencies up to 100 Hz and b = 450 s/mm2 . Comparisons were made against standard pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE) diffusion in vivo and in an isotropic diffusion phantom. RESULTS: Simulations show that to achieve high frequency and b-value simultaneously for OGSE, high gradient amplitude, high slew rates, and high peripheral nerve stimulation limits are required. A strong linear trend for increased diffusivity (mean: 8-19%, radial: 9-27%, parallel: 8-15%) was observed in normal white matter with OGSE (20 Hz to 100 Hz) as compared to PGSE. Linear fitting to frequency provided excellent correlation, and using a short-range disorder model provided radial long-term diffusivities of D∞,MD = 911 ± 72 µm2 /s, D∞,PD = 1519 ± 164 µm2 /s, and D∞,RD = 640 ± 111 µm2 /s and correlation lengths of lc ,MD = 0.802 ± 0.156 µm, lc ,PD = 0.837 ± 0.172 µm, and lc ,RD = 0.780 ± 0.174 µm. Diffusivity changes with OGSE frequency were negligible in the phantom, as expected. CONCLUSION: The high gradient amplitude, high slew rate, and high peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds of the MAGNUS head-gradient enables OGSE acquisition for in vivo human brain imaging.
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: D K Jones; D C Alexander; R Bowtell; M Cercignani; F Dell'Acqua; D J McHugh; K L Miller; M Palombo; G J M Parker; U S Rudrapatna; C M W Tax Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Chitresh Bhushan; Justin P Haldar; Soyoung Choi; Anand A Joshi; David W Shattuck; Richard M Leahy Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Thomas K F Foo; Evangelos Laskaris; Mark Vermilyea; Minfeng Xu; Paul Thompson; Gene Conte; Christopher Van Epps; Christopher Immer; Seung-Kyun Lee; Ek T Tan; Dominic Graziani; Jean-Baptise Mathieu; Christopher J Hardy; John F Schenck; Eric Fiveland; Wolfgang Stautner; Justin Ricci; Joseph Piel; Keith Park; Yihe Hua; Ye Bai; Alex Kagan; David Stanley; Paul T Weavers; Erin Gray; Yunhong Shu; Matthew A Frick; Norbert G Campeau; Joshua Trzasko; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Seung-Kyun Lee; Jean-Baptiste Mathieu; Dominic Graziani; Joseph Piel; Eric Budesheim; Eric Fiveland; Christopher J Hardy; Ek Tsoon Tan; Bruce Amm; Thomas K-F Foo; Matt A Bernstein; John Huston; Yunhong Shu; John F Schenck Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Filip Szczepankiewicz; Danielle van Westen; Elisabet Englund; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Junzhong Xu; Hua Li; Ke Li; Kevin D Harkins; Xiaoyu Jiang; Jingping Xie; Hakmook Kang; Richard D Dortch; Adam W Anderson; Mark D Does; John C Gore Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Qiuyun Fan; Cornelius Eichner; Maryam Afzali; Lars Mueller; Chantal M W Tax; Mathias Davids; Mirsad Mahmutovic; Boris Keil; Berkin Bilgic; Kawin Setsompop; Hong-Hsi Lee; Qiyuan Tian; Chiara Maffei; Gabriel Ramos-Llordén; Aapo Nummenmaa; Thomas Witzel; Anastasia Yendiki; Yi-Qiao Song; Chu-Chung Huang; Ching-Po Lin; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Alfred Anwander; Derek K Jones; Bruce R Rosen; Lawrence L Wald; Susie Y Huang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 7.400