PURPOSE: To develop a novel magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) acquisition using a hybrid radial EPI readout scheme (TURBINE), and to demonstrate its feasibility to obtain wave images and stiffness maps in a phantom and in vivo brain. METHOD: The proposed 3D TURBINE-MRE is based on a spoiled gradient-echo MRE sequence with the EPI readout radially rotating about the phase-encoding axis to sample a full 3D k-space. A polyvinyl chloride phantom and 6 volunteers were scanned on a compact 3T GE scanner with a 32-channel head coil at 80 Hz and 60 Hz external vibration, respectively. For comparison, a standard 2D, multislice, spin-echo (SE) EPI-MRE acquisition was also performed with the same motion encoding and resolution. The TURBINE-MRE images were off-line reconstructed with iterative SENSE algorithm. The regional ROI analysis was performed on the 6 volunteers, and the median stiffness values were compared between SE-EPI-MRE and TURBINE-MRE. RESULTS: The 3D wave-field images and the generated stiffness maps were comparable between TURBINE-MRE and standard SE-EPI-MRE for the phantom and the volunteers. The Bland-Altman plot showed no significant difference in the median regional stiffness values between the two methods. The stiffness measured with the 2 methods had a strong linear relationship with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.943. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of the new TURBINE-MRE sequence for acquiring the desired 3D wave-field data and stiffness maps in a phantom and in-vivo brains. This pilot study encourages further exploration of TURBINE-MRE for functional MRE, free-breathing abdominal MRE, and cardiac MRE applications.
PURPOSE: To develop a novel magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) acquisition using a hybrid radial EPI readout scheme (TURBINE), and to demonstrate its feasibility to obtain wave images and stiffness maps in a phantom and in vivo brain. METHOD: The proposed 3D TURBINE-MRE is based on a spoiled gradient-echo MRE sequence with the EPI readout radially rotating about the phase-encoding axis to sample a full 3D k-space. A polyvinyl chloride phantom and 6 volunteers were scanned on a compact 3T GE scanner with a 32-channel head coil at 80 Hz and 60 Hz external vibration, respectively. For comparison, a standard 2D, multislice, spin-echo (SE) EPI-MRE acquisition was also performed with the same motion encoding and resolution. The TURBINE-MRE images were off-line reconstructed with iterative SENSE algorithm. The regional ROI analysis was performed on the 6 volunteers, and the median stiffness values were compared between SE-EPI-MRE and TURBINE-MRE. RESULTS: The 3D wave-field images and the generated stiffness maps were comparable between TURBINE-MRE and standard SE-EPI-MRE for the phantom and the volunteers. The Bland-Altman plot showed no significant difference in the median regional stiffness values between the two methods. The stiffness measured with the 2 methods had a strong linear relationship with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.943. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of the new TURBINE-MRE sequence for acquiring the desired 3D wave-field data and stiffness maps in a phantom and in-vivo brains. This pilot study encourages further exploration of TURBINE-MRE for functional MRE, free-breathing abdominal MRE, and cardiac MRE applications.
Authors: Eric Barnhill; Lyam Hollis; Ingolf Sack; Jürgen Braun; Peter R Hoskins; Pankaj Pankaj; Colin Brown; Edwin J R van Beek; Neil Roberts Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2016-06-04 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Ian Gavin Murphy; Martin J Graves; Scott Reid; Andrew J Patterson; Ilse Patterson; Andrew N Priest; David J Lomas Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Thomas K F Foo; Evangelos Laskaris; Mark Vermilyea; Minfeng Xu; Paul Thompson; Gene Conte; Christopher Van Epps; Christopher Immer; Seung-Kyun Lee; Ek T Tan; Dominic Graziani; Jean-Baptise Mathieu; Christopher J Hardy; John F Schenck; Eric Fiveland; Wolfgang Stautner; Justin Ricci; Joseph Piel; Keith Park; Yihe Hua; Ye Bai; Alex Kagan; David Stanley; Paul T Weavers; Erin Gray; Yunhong Shu; Matthew A Frick; Norbert G Campeau; Joshua Trzasko; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christian Guenthner; Sweta Sethi; Marian Troelstra; Ayse Sila Dokumaci; Ralph Sinkus; Sebastian Kozerke Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Ariel J Hannum; Grace McIlvain; Damian Sowinski; Matthew D J McGarry; Curtis L Johnson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Grace McIlvain; Alexander M Cerjanic; Anthony G Christodoulou; Matthew D J McGarry; Curtis L Johnson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 3.737