| Literature DB >> 29510526 |
Yasar Hoosen1, Priyamvada Pradeep2, Pradeep Kumar3, Lisa C du Toit4, Yahya E Choonara5, Viness Pillay6.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) has gained a great deal of attention due to its aggressive proliferative capabilities, high death rates and poor treatment outcomes, rendering the disease the ultimate lethal gynaecological cancer. Nanotechnology provides a promising avenue to combat this malignancy by the niche fabrication of optimally-structured nanomedicines that ensure potent delivery of chemotherapeutics to OC, employing nanocarriers to act as "intelligent" drug delivery vehicles, functionalized with active targeting approaches for precision delivery of chemotherapeutics to overexpressed biomarkers on cancer cells. Recently, much focus has been implemented to optimize these active targeting mechanisms for treatment/diagnostic purposes employing nanocarriers. This two-part article aims to review the latest advances in active target-based OC interventions, where the impact of the newest antibody, aptamer and folate functionalization on OC detection and treatment is discussed in contrast to the limitations of this targeting mechanism. Furthermore, we discuss the latest advances in nanocarrier based drug delivery in OC, highlighting their commercial/clinical viability of these systems beyond the realms of research. Lastly, in the second section of this review, we comprehensively discussed a focus shift in OC targeting from the well-studied OC cells to the vastly neglected extracellular matrix and motivate the potential for glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) as a more focused extracellular molecular target.Entities:
Keywords: antibodies; chemotherapy; glycosaminoglycans; nanomedicine; ovarian cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29510526 PMCID: PMC5877592 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19030731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1A schematic depicting method employed for active targeting of nanoparticles. I. Antibody-based targeting, which involves the use of: (A) monoclonal antibodies such as anti-Her2/neu antibody directed toward Her2/neu receptors on the target cell membrane; and (B) antibody fragments: single-chain variable fragments (scFV) such as single-chain anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody directed toward EGFR, or antigen-binding fragment (Fab) such as anti-Her2/neu Fab. II. Aptamer-based targeting such as the A10 RNA aptamer directed toward prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) on the surface of the target cells. III. Ligand-based targeting such as: (A) transferrin-based targeting of nanoparticles toward transferrin receptors where uptake of the nanoparticles takes place through receptor-mediated endocytosis through clathrin-coated pits; and (B) folate-based targeting using folic acid (FA) to target folate receptor alpha (FRα), which is upregulated on the surface of neoplastic cells. (Reprinted from [23] with permission from Cancer Research Clinical Oncology).
Figure 2Flow chart representing the two ovarian cancer targets with their respective antibodies [39].
Figure 3Schematic illustration of the fabrication processes of Ag2S QDs/aptamer/5-Fu hybrid-based near-infrared (NIR) photoluminescence (PL) turn-on probe of CA125. (Reprinted from [45] with permission from Biosensors and Bioelectronics)
Figure 4Schematic representation of NCP-1/siRNAs carrying cisplatin in the solid core and siRNAs in the lipid shell. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [86]. Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.
Presenting the various nanocarriers involved in siRNA delivery to target OC and the systems response.
| Drug | Targeting Moiety | Nanocarrier | Response | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin, GEM and siRNA | - | Lipid based nanocarrier, with a self -assembled core-shell NCP | - NCP-siRNAs NPs efficiently downregulated the | [ |
| siRNA | FA to target HuR Overexpression | Derivatized DNA dendrimer | - When Mice were injected twice weekly with FA-3DNA-siHuR for 4 weeks, the median survival of FA-3DNA-siHuR-treated mice were approximately 1.5 times longer than the controls. | [ |
| Co-delivery of cisplatin and siRNAs | - | NMOFs | - The cisplatin IC50 values of free cisplatin, UiO-Cis, pooled siRNAs/UiO-Cis, free cisplatin plus free pooled siRNAs, and free cisplatin plus pooled siRNAs/UiO were 53.9 ± 4.7, 53.2 ± 4.4, 4.7 ± 1.8, 45.1 ± 7.0, and 6.6 ± 0.3 μM, respectively. | [ |
| PTX and siRNA | LHRH peptide | Nanoscale PPI dendrimer | - LHRH-PPI-siRNA and LHRH-PPI-PTX combination enhanced the cytotoxicity of the conjugate. | [ |
| siRNA | HA-NP system targeting CD44 receptors | HA based self-assembling NPs | - Tumour volume of mice treated with HA-PEG/MDR1 siRNAs targeted NPs was approximately 3-fold lower than in mice treated with native PTX. | [ |
| DOX and siRNA | NA | MSNP | - MSNP with siRNAs caused increased cellular accumulation of DOX. | [ |
| Blc2-siRNA and DOX | FA-targeting overexpressed FR | copolymer self-assembled cationic micelles | - The highest apoptosis of 77.5% were observed in cells incubated with FA-DOX-Bcl2 siRNA-NPs leading to potent synergistic effects inducing cell apoptosis. | [ |
| siID4 | tandem tumour-penetrating and membrane-translocating peptide to target ID4 | TPN | - The tumour burden in mice that received TPN/siID4 remained low compared to controls, 80% of these recipients survived >60 days, despite treatments stopping at day 50. | [ |
Abbreviations in the table are defined as follows: NMOFs, nanoscale metal−organic frameworks; GEM, gemcitabine; LHRH, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone peptide; PPI, polypropylenimine; PTX, paclitaxel; CD44, Cluster of differentiation 44; HA-NP, Hyaluronan Nanoparticle; DOX, Doxorubicin; MSNP, mesoporous silica nanoparticles; siID4, ID4-specific siRNA; TPN, tumour penetrating nanocomplex.
Presenting various nanocarriers involved in drug delivery for OC and the systems response.
| Drug | Targeting Moiety | Nanocarrier | Response | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOX | FA to target FR | pH-sensitive micelles | - The micelle formulation effectively decreased the growth of existing MDR tumours in mice for at least 50 days by three i.v. injections at a 3-day interval at a dose of 10 mg DOX/kg. | [ |
| PTX | OA02 peptide | Micellar NPs formed using PEG-block-dendritic CA copolymers (PTX-OA02-NPs) | - PTX-OA02-NPs displayed superior tumour growth inhibition than Taxol®, at equivalent PTX dose of 10 mg/kg. | [ |
| PTX and CDDP | NA | Biodegradable, biocompatible polypeptide-based polymeric micelles | - MTT assays on A2780 cells revealed IC50 values Free CDDP is 1.5 in contrast to (CDDP + PTX)/cl-micelles of 0.14 exhibiting superior killing properties. | [ |
| DOX | TATp | PEG-Hz-PE conjugated immunoliposomes | [ | |
| Co-delivery of PTX and curcumin | TF to target resistant OC spheroids and in vivo tumours | PEG-PE based polymeric micelles | - The TF-targeted PTX system displayed and enhanced micelle penetration into spheroids reducing cell viability to 35.3 ± 2.7% at 6.9 µM of micellar PTX concentrations when compared to free PTX at 80 ± 22% at 6.9 µM dosage. | [ |
| GEM | cRGDfK peptide targeting αvβ3 integrin receptors | PLGA based NPs | - The IC50 values after 48 hours of incubation in SKOV3 cells for GEM, GEM-NPs and GEM-RGDfK-NPs were 0.572 ± 0.013 μg/ml, 0.148 ± 0.01 μg/mL and 0.034 ± 0.004 μg/mL respectively. | [ |
| DOX coupled with a NIR dye for theranostic application | LLHRH | self-assembling HA NPs, | - Results demonstrate that LHRH-conjugated NPs possess a desirable tumour imaging capability and an excellent anticancer effect, such that almost 30% of the original tumour size was reduced in 20 days. | [ |
Abbreviations in the table are defined as follows: PTX, paclitaxel; i.v., intravenous; PEG, polyethylene glycol; CA, cholic acid; CDDP, cis-dichlorodiamminoplatinum; TATp, transactivator of transcription peptide; PEG-Hz-PE, Polyethylene glycol–Hydrazine–phosphatidylethanolamine; TF, Transferrin; PEG-PE, polyethylene glycol-phosphatidylethanolamine; GEM, Gemcitabine hydrochloride, PLGA, poly (d,l-lactic-co-glycolic) acid.
The correlation of CS-E to OC, summarising and supporting CS-E as an important biomarker for OC diagnosis as well as a powerful molecular target for OC treatment.
| Implication in OC | References |
|---|---|
| CS-E displays strong up regulation in primary ovarian carcinomas which is responsible for the poor prognostic parameters, including high tumour grade and advanced FIGO stages. | [ |
| CS-E can strongly bind to VEGF which is the most important pro- angiogenic stimulator. Furthermore, high CS-E levels correlate to high VEGF, causing further neo-vascularization development in the tumour stroma causing ovarian spheroid formation this spheroid formation is associated with the highly aggressive and invasive characteristics of OC. | [ |
| The elevated CS-E aids the adhesion of tumours as it is responsible for increasing the adhesive properties of adhesion molecules N-cadherin and E- cadherin. In addition, integrins also play a role in adhesion as they can interact directly with CS chains, blocking of integrin receptors result in inhibition of OC cell adhesion. | [ |
| The overexpression of CS-E improves the adhesive properties of tumour cells. | [ |
| CS-E is responsible for the invasion and migration of tumours. MMPs is a group of enzymes responsible for OC progression. The activation and regulation are strongly influenced by CS, Furthermore, CS-E can interact with MPPs such as pro-MMP7, contributing to the activation and metastasis of tumour cells. | [ |
| CS-E expression is predominantly seen in the stromal compartment of both primary ovarian carcinomas and metastasis. | [ |
| The expression of mRNA for GalNAc4S-6ST, an enzyme which is responsible for the biosynthesis of CS-E, is up-regulated in OC. | [ |
| CHST15, the only sulfotransferase responsible for biosynthesis of CS-E presents an altered transcription pattern in OC, furthermore increased CHST15 levels lead to increased CS-E levels. | [ |
| CS has shown to be involved tumour cell proliferation, growth, angiogenesis, adhesion, migration, invasion, and survival of OC tumours. | [ |
Abbreviations in the table are defined as follows: VEGF, Vascular endothelial growth factor; MMPs, Metalloproteinases; GalNAc4S-6ST, Gal-NAc-4-sulphate-6-O-sulfotransferase.
Various antibodies used to target their respective CS isomer.
| Antibody | Specificity | Target Selectivity of CS Isomer | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| GD3G7 antibody | antibody GD3G7 reacted strongly with CS-E, rich in GalNAc4S6S disaccharide units. minor reactivity with CS-A. no reactivity was observed with DS, CS-C, CS-D, and HS. | [ | |
| The mAb 473HD | DSD | recognizes the characteristic CS structure named the DSD-1 epitope that contains the D-unit. | [ |
| mAb CS-56 | reacts with CS-A and CS-C also reacts preferentially with CS-D reacts weakly with CS-C, no reactivity with any other CS variants | [ | |
| mAb MO-225 | reacts strongly with CS-D moderately with CS-C and CS-E weakly with CS-A | [ | |
| 473HD | CS-D | reacted with the hexa- and larger oligosaccharide fractions derived from CS-D | [ |
| IO3D9 | reacts with CS-C and weakly with CS-A strong reactivity with CSE compared to CSA or CSC | [ | |
| IO3H10 | reacts with CSC reacts with CSA | [ | |
| IO3H12 | reacts with CSC reacts with CSA | [ | |
| 12C and E-18H | CS-E specific | no reactivity with any other CS isomer | [ |
| GD3A11 | CS-E specific | no reactivity is observed with other immobilized GAGs such CS-A, CS-B, CS-C, CS-D, HS, and heparin | [ |
Figure 5Construction of cancer targeting lyophilisomes depicting conjugation between albumin-based lyophilisomes and GD3G7 antibodies reactive with CS-E, by applying a two-step approach comprising sortase mediated ligation and click chemistry. (A) LPETG-His-VSV tagged single chain GD3G7 antibodies were modified for click chemistry by introducing amino-PEG4-DBCO through a reaction mediated by Sortase A. (B) Lyophilisomes were functionalized for click chemistry by conjugating PEG4-azide to the primary amine groups of lyophilisomes mediated by N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS). (C) Antibody-functionalized lyophilisomes were generated by a click reaction between azido-conjugated lyophilisomes and GD3G7-PEG4-DBCO antibodies. Abbreviations: CS-E, chondroitin sulphate E; DBCO, dibenzylcyclooctyne; VL, light chain variable domain; VH, heavy chain variable domain; SrtA, Sortase A. (Reprinted from [126] with permission from Elsevier)
The relationship of CD44 and HA to the ovarian cancer development.
| Implication in OC | References |
|---|---|
| CD44 is proposed to be involved in increased motility of cancer cells as well as differentiation of cancer stem cells | [ |
| Co-overexpression of CD44 and multiple drug resistance proteins such as MDR1 and MDR2 correlate to OC progression. | [ |
| RHAMM and CD44 are vital components for tumour progression. | [ |
| When HA synthase and HA are down regulated directly using siRNAs it causes impaired cytoskeletal activation and decreased migration of tumours. | [ |
| HA mediates the physical linkage between CD44s and Her2/ErbB2 tyrosine kinase, which results in the rapid stimulation of ovarian carcinoma cell growth. | [ |
| Elevated CD44 expression is observed in OC in contrast to benign and borderline tumours. | [ |
| Elevated HA concentration provides and additional growth advantage of primary ovarian tumours due to the cells ability to produce a HA rich stroma environment. | [ |
| The high stromal HA levels are significantly associated with poor differentiation, serous histological type, advanced stage, and large primary residual tumour in epithelial OC. | [ |
| CD44 expressions correlate with the expression of the drug efflux pump Pgp causing resistance and progression of metastases. | [ |
| CD44 inhibition following treatment of the CD44 monoclonal antibody inhibits OC cell motility no significant impact on invasion | [ |
| Anti-CD44 antibody has been shown to decrease the number of total peritoneal OC metastases in mice. | [ |