Literature DB >> 21909084

Thermodynamically stable RNA three-way junction for constructing multifunctional nanoparticles for delivery of therapeutics.

Dan Shu1, Yi Shu, Farzin Haque, Sherine Abdelmawla, Peixuan Guo.   

Abstract

RNA nanoparticles have applications in the treatment of cancers and viral infection; however, the instability of RNA nanoparticles has hindered their development for therapeutic applications. The lack of covalent linkage or crosslinking in nanoparticles causes dissociation in vivo. Here we show that the packaging RNA of bacteriophage phi29 DNA packaging motor can be assembled from 3-6 pieces of RNA oligomers without the use of metal salts. Each RNA oligomer contains a functional module that can be a receptor-binding ligand, aptamer, short interfering RNA or ribozyme. When mixed together, they self-assemble into thermodynamically stable tri-star nanoparticles with a three-way junction core. These nanoparticles are resistant to 8 M urea denaturation, are stable in serum and remain intact at extremely low concentrations. The modules remain functional in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that the three-way junction core can be used as a platform for building a variety of multifunctional nanoparticles. We studied 25 different three-way junction motifs in biological RNA and found only one other motif that shares characteristics similar to the three-way junction of phi29 pRNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909084      PMCID: PMC3189281          DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol        ISSN: 1748-3387            Impact factor:   39.213


Living organisms produce an assortment of highly ordered structures composed of DNA, RNA and proteins to perform diverse functions. DNA has been used as biomaterials[1] but RNA, which share common properties with DNA, has received less attention[2-4]. RNA is attractive because it possesses non-canonical base-pairing and catalytic function similar to some proteins[2] and yet like DNA, it can be easily manipulated. Typically, RNA molecules contain a large variety of single-stranded stem-loops for inter- and/or intra-molecular interactions[5]. These loops serve as mounting dovetails, which eliminates the need for external linking dowels during fabrication and assembly[3,6]. Since the discovery of siRNA[7], nanoparticles of siRNA[8-10], ribozymes[11-13], riboswitch[14,15], miRNA[16-18] have been explored for the treatment of cancers and viral infections. One of the challenges in the field of RNA nanotechnology is the relative instability of the nanoparticles; lack of covalent binding or cross-linking in the particles causes dissociation at ultra low concentrations in the animal and human circulation systems after systemic injection. This has hindered the efficiency of delivery and therapeutic applications of RNA nanoparticles[2]. Although it is not absolutely necessary for RNA helix formation, tens of mM of magnesium is required for optimum folding of nanoparticles such as phi29 pRNA[19,20]. Because the concentration of magnesium under physiological conditions is generally less than 1mM, misfolding and dissociation of nanostructures that use RNA as a scaffold can occur at such low concentrations. The DNA packaging motor of bacteriophage phi29 is geared by a pRNA ring[21], which contains two functional domains[22,23]. The central domain of a pRNA subunit contains two interlocking loops, denoted as right- and left-handed loops, that can be engineered to form dimers, trimers or hexamers[3,24,25]. Because the two domains fold separately, replacing the helical domain with a siRNA does not affect the structure, folding or intermolecular interactions of the pRNA[23,26,27]. Such a pRNA/siRNA chimera has been shown to be useful for gene therapy[8-11]. The two domains are connected by a three-way junction (3WJ) region (Fig 1d) and this unique structure has motivated its use in RNA nanotechnology. Here we show that the 3WJ region of the pRNA can be assembled from three pieces of small RNA oligomers with high affinity. The resulting complex is stable and resistant to denaturation in the presence of 8M urea. Incubation of three RNA oligomers, with each carrying either a siRNA, a receptor binding aptamer or a ribozyme, resulted in trivalent RNA nanoparticles that are suited as therapeutic agents. Of the 25 3WJ motifs obtained from different biological systems, we found the pRNA 3WJ most stable.
Figure 1

Sequence and secondary structure of phi29 DNA-packaging RNA (pRNA)

a, Illustration of the phi29 packaging motor geared by six pRNAs (orange, pink, light blue, green, dark blue and yellow structures). b, Schematic showing a pRNA hexamer assembled through hand-in-hand interactions of six pRNA monomers. c, Sequence of pRNA monomer Ab′. Green box: central 3WJ domain. Uppercase and lowercase letters in Ab′ represent right- and left-hand loops, respectively. d, The 3WJ domain composed of three RNA oligomers in black, blue and red. Helical segments are represented as H1, H2, H3. e, A trivalent RNA nanoparticle consisting of three pRNA molecules bound at the 3WJ-pRNA core sequence (red, black and blue) and its accompanying AFM images (f). Ab′ indicates non-complementary loops[35].

Properties of the 3WJ-pRNA

The 3WJ domain of phi29 pRNA was constructed using three pieces of RNA oligos denoted a3WJ, b3WJ, and c3WJ (Fig. 1d). Two of the oligos a3WJ, and c3WJ were resistant to staining by ethidium bromide (Fig. 2a) and weakly stained by SYBR Green-II, while c3WJ remained unstainable (Fig. 2a). Ethidium bromide is an intercalating agent that stain dsRNA and dsDNA or ssRNA containing secondary structures or base-stacking. SYBR Green II stains both ss- and ds-RNA or DNA. The absence or weak staining indicates novel structural properties.
Figure 2

Assembly and stability studies of 3WJ-pRNA

In tables, ‘+’ indicates the presence of the strand in samples of the corresponding lanes. a, 15% native PAGE showing the assembly of the 3WJ core, stained by EB (upper) and SYBR Green II (lower). b, Melting curves for the assembly of the 3WJ core. The melting curves for the individual strands (brown, green, silver), two-strand combinations (blue, cyan, pink), and three-strand combination (red) are shown. c, Oligo sequences of 3WJ-pRNA cores and mutants. “del U”-deletion of U bulge; “del UUU”-deletion of UUU bulge; “del 4-nt”-deletion of 2-nucleotides at 3′ and 5′ ends, respectively. d, Length requirements for the assembly of 3WJ cores and stability assays by urea denaturation. e, Comparison of DNA and RNA 3WJ-core in native and urea gel.

The mixing of three oligos a3WJ, b3WJ, and c3WJ at 1:1:1 stoichiometric ratio at room temperature in distilled water resulted in high efficient formation of the 3WJ domain. Melting experiments suggest that the three components of the 3WJ-pRNA core (Tm of 58°C) have a much higher affinity to interact favorably in comparison with any of the two components (Fig. 2b). The 3WJ domain remained stable in distilled water without dissociating at room temperature for weeks. If one of the oligos was omitted (Fig. 2a, lanes 4–6), dimers were observed, as exhibited by faster migration rates compared to the 3WJ domain (Fig. 2a, lane 7). Generally, dsDNA and dsRNA are denatured and dissociate in presence of 5M[28] or 7M urea[29]. In the presence of 8M urea, the 3WJ domain remained stable without dissociation (Fig. 2d), thereby demonstrating its robust nature. The length of the helices H1, H2 and H3 were 8, 9, and 8 base-pairs, respectively. RNA complexes with the deletion of 2 base-pairs in H1 and H3 (Fig. 1d, Fig. 2d) seems to have no effect on complex formation (Fig. 2d, lanes 8, 9). However, deletion of 2 base-pairs at H2 (Fig. 1d, Fig. 2d), did not affect the formation of the complex, but made the 3WJ domain unstable in the presence of 8M urea (Fig. 2d, lanes 7, 10). These results demonstrate that while 6 base pairs are sufficient in two of the stem regions, 8 bases are necessary for H2 to keep the junction domain stable under strongly denaturing conditions. To further evaluate the chemical and thermodynamic properties of 3WJ-pRNA, the same sequences were used to construct a DNA 3WJ domain. In native gel, when the three DNA oligos are mixed in a 1:1:1 ratio, the 3WJ-DNA assembled (Fig. 2e). However, the DNA 3WJ complex dissociated in the presence of 8M urea (Fig. 2e, bottom). DNA/RNA hybrid 3WJ domains exhibited increasing stability as more RNA strands were incorporated. In essence, by controlling the ratio of DNA to RNA in the 3WJ domain region, the stability can be tuned accordingly. To assess the stability of the 3WJ-pRNA, we conducted competition experiments in the presence of urea and at different temperatures as a function of time. For a candidate therapeutic RNA nanoparticle, it is necessary to evaluate whether it would dissociate at physiological temperature of 37°C. A fixed concentration of the Cy3 labeled 3WJ-pRNA core was incubated with unlabeled b3WJ at 25°C, 37°C, and 55°C, respectively. At 25°C, there is no exchange of labeled and unlabeled b3wj (Fig. 3a); at physiological temperature of 37°C, only a very small amount of exchange is observed in the presence of 1000-fold higher concentration of labeled b3wj (Fig. 3a); and at 55°C (close to the Tm of the 3WJ-pRNA), there is approximately half-and-half exchange at 10-fold excess and near-complete exchange at 1000-fold higher concentration of labeled b3wj (Fig. 3a). The results are consistent with the Tm measurements.
Figure 3

Competition and dissociation assays of 3WJ-pRNA

a, Temperature effects on the stability of 3WJ-pRNA core, denoted [ab*c]3WJ evaluated by 16% native gel. Fixed concentration of Cy3 labeled [ab*c]3WJ was incubated with varying concentration of unlabeled b3WJ at 25°C, 37°C, and 55°C. b, Urea denaturing effects on the stability of [ab*c]3WJ evaluated by 16% native gel. Fixed concentration of labeled [ab*c]3WJ was incubated with unlabelled b3WJ at ratios of 1:1 and 1:5 in the presence of 0–6M urea at 25°C. c, Dissociation assay for the [32P]-3WJ-pRNA complex harboring three monomeric pRNA by 2-fold serial dilution (lanes 1–9). Monomer unit is shown on the left.

A fixed concentration of the Cy3 labeled 3WJ-pRNA core was incubated with unlabeled b3WJ at room temperature in presence of 0–6M urea. At equimolar concentrations (Cy3-[a b*c]3WJ:unlabeled b3wj=1:1), there was little or no exchange under all urea conditions investigated (Fig 3b). At five-fold higher concentration (Cy3-[ab*c]3WJ:unlabeled b3wj=1:5), there was little or no exchange under 2M and 4M urea conditions; and ~20% exchange at 6M-urea (Fig 3b). So, 6M urea ‘destabilizes’ the 3WJ-pRNA complex only to an insignificant extent.

Construction and properties of 3WJ-pRNA with therapeutic modules

It has been previously demonstrated that the extension of the phi29 pRNA at the 3′-end does not affect the folding of pRNA global structure[26]. The sequences of the three RNA oligos a3WJ, b3WJ, and c3WJ, were placed at the 3′-end of the pRNA monomer, Ab′. Mixing of the three resulting pRNA chimeras containing a3WJ, b3WJ, and c3WJ sequences respectively, at equimolar concentrations led to the assembly of 3WJ branched nanoparticles harboring one pRNA at each branch. AFM images strongly confirmed the formation of larger RNA complexes with three-branches (Fig. 1e, f), which were consistent with gel shift assays (Fig. 3c). This nanoparticle can also be co-transcribed and assembled in one step during transcription with high yield (data not shown). When RNA nanoparticles are delivered systemically to the body, the particles will exist in low concentrations due to dilution by circulating blood. Only those RNA particles that are intact at low concentrations can be considered as therapeutic agents for systemic delivery. To determine whether the larger structure with three branches harboring multi-module functionalities are subjected to dissociation at low concentration, this [32P]-labeled complex was serially diluted to extremely low concentrations. It was found that the concentration for dissociation was below the detection limit of the [32P]-labeling technology. Even at 160 pM in TMS buffer, the lowest concentration tested, the dissociation of the nanoparticles was undetectable (Fig. 3c). Multi-module RNA nanoparticles were constructed using this 3WJ-pRNA domain as a scaffold (Fig. 4a). Each branch of the 3WJ carried one RNA module with defined functionality, such as a cell receptor binding ligand, aptamer, siRNA, ribozyme. The presence of the modules or therapeutic moieties did not interfere with the formation of the 3WJ domain, as demonstrated by AFM imaging (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, the chemically modified (2′-F U/C) 3WJ-pRNA complex harboring three monomeric pRNAs were resistant to degradation in cell culture medium with 10% serum even after 36 hours of incubation, while the unmodified RNA degraded within 10-min (Supplementary Fig.3).
Figure 4

Construction of multi-module RNA nanoparticles harboring siRNA, ribozyme, and aptamer

a-c, Assembly of RNA nanoparticles with functionalities using the 3WJ-pRNA and 3WJ-5S rRNA as scaffolds. a, Illustration; b, 8% native (upper) and denaturing (lower) PAGE gel; c, AFM images of 3WJ-pRNA-siSur-rZ-FA nanoparticles. d–e, Assessing the catalytic activity of the Hepatitis B virus (HBV) ribozyme incorporated into the 3WJ-pRNA (d) and 3WJ-5S rRNA (e) cores, evaluated in 10% 8M Urea PAGE. The cleaved RNA product is boxed. Positive control: pRNA/HBV-Rz; Negative control: 3WJ-RNA/siSur-MG-FA. f–g, Functional assay of the MG (malachite green) aptamer incorporated in RNA nanoparticles using the 3WJ-pRNA (f) and 3WJ-5S rRNA (g) cores. MG fluorescence was measured using excitation wavelengths 475 and 615nm.

In vitro and in vivo assessments of 3wj-pRNA with therapeutic modules

Making fusion complexes of DNA or RNA is not difficult, but ensuring the appropriate folding of individual modules within the complex after fusion is not a simple task. To test whether the incorporated RNA moieties retain their original folding and functionality after being fused and incorporated, Hepatitis B virus (HBV) cleaving ribozyme[11] and MG (Malachite Green dye, triphenylmethane) binding aptamer[30] were used as model systems for structure and function verification. The free MG is not fluorescent by itself, but emits fluorescent light after binding to the aptamer. It was found that the HBV ribozyme was able to cleave its RNA substrate after being incorporated into the nanoparticles (Fig. 4d) and the fused MG-binding aptamer retained its capacity to bind MG, as revealed by its fluorescence emission (Fig. 4f). The activity results are comparable to optimized positive controls and therefore confirm that individual RNA modules fused into the nanoparticles retained their original folding after incorporation into the RNA nanoparticles. Many kinds of cancer cell lines, especially from the epithelial origin, overexpress the folate receptor on the surface elevated by thousand fold. Folate has been used extensively as a cancer cell delivery agent via folate receptor-mediated endocytosis[31]. The 2′-F U/C modified fluorescent 3WJ-pRNA nanoparticles with folate conjugated into one of its branches complex were tested for its cell binding efficiency. One fragment of 3WJ-pRNA core was labeled with the folic acid for targeted delivery[10], the second fragment was labeled with Cy3, and the third fragment was fused to the siRNA that can silence the gene of the anti-apoptotic factor, surviving[32]. Negative controls included the RNA nanoparticles contained folate but scramble siRNA sequence; and 3WJ-pRNA core with active siRNA but without folate. Flow cytometry data revealed that the folate-3WJ-pRNA nanoparticles bound and loaded its siRNA to the cell with almost 100% binding efficiency (Fig.5a, Supplementary Fig.4). Confocal imaging indicated a strong binding of the RNA nanoparticles and efficient entry into the targeted cells, as demonstrated by the excellent co-localization and overlap of the fluorescent 3WJ-pRNA nanoparticles (red) and cytoplasma (green) (Fig.5b).
Figure 5

In vitro and in vivo binding and entry of 3WJ-pRNA nanoparticles into targeted cells

a, Flow cytometry revealed the binding and specific entry of fluorescent-[3WJ-pRNA-siSur-rZ-FA] nanoparticles into folate receptor positive (FA+) cells. Positive and negative controls were Cy3-FA-DNA and Cy3-[3WJ-pRNA-siSur-rZ-NH2] (without FA), respectively. b, Confocal images showed targeting of FA+-KB cells by co-localization (overlap, 4) of cytoplasma (green, 1) and RNA nanoparticles (red, 2) (magnified, bottom panel). Blue–nuclei, 3. c–d, Target gene knock-down effects showed by (c) qRT-PCR with GADPH as endogenous control and by (d) Western blot assay with β–actin as endogenous control. e, 3WJ-pRNA nanoparticles target FA+ tumor xenografts upon systemic administration in nude mice. Upper panel: whole body; Lower panel: organ imaging; Lv=liver; K=kidney; H=heart; L=lung; S=spleen; I=intestine; M=muscle; T=tumor). Scale: Fluorescent Intensity.

Two 3WJ-RNA nanopartles were constructed for assaying gene silencing effect. Particle [3WJ-pRNA-siSur-rZ-FA] harbors folate and survivin siRNA, while [3WJ-pRNA-siScram-Rz-FA] harbors folate and Survivin siRNA scramble as control. After 48hrs transfection, both qRT-PCR and Western Blot assays confirmed reduced survivin gene expression level of 3WJ-pRNA-siSur-rZ-FA compared to the scramble control on both mRNA and protein levels. The silencing potency is comparable to the positive Survivin siRNA only control, albeit the reduction of both the RNA complexes was modest (Fig.5c). Two of the key factors that may affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile are metabolic stability and renal filtration. It has been reported that regular siRNA molecules have extremely poor pharmacokinetic properties, since they have a short half-life (T1/2) and fast kidney clearance due to both metabolic instability and small size (<10-nm)[33]. The PK profile of AlexaFluor647-2′-F-pRNA nanoparticles that use the 3WJ domain as a scaffold were studied in mice upon systemic administration of a single intravenous injection via the tail vein, followed by blood collection. The concentration of the fluorescent nanoparticle in serum was determined. The half-life (t1/2) of the pRNA nanoparticles was determined to be 6.5~12.6 hours, compared to the control 2′F-modified siRNA, which could not be detected beyond 5 min post-injection, which is close to the t1/2 of 35 mins reported in the literature[34]. To confirm that the RNA nanoparticles were not dissociated into individual subunits in vivo, RNA nanoparticles were constructed with one subunit carrying the folate to serve as a ligand for binding to the cancer cells, and the other subunit carrying a fluorescent dye. The nanoparticles were systemically injected into mice through the tail vein. Whole body imaging revealed that fluorescence was located specifically at the xenograpic cancer experssing the folate-receptor and was not detected in other organs in the body (Fig.5e), indicating that the particles did not dissociate in vivo after systemic delivery.

Comparing pRNA 3WJ with other 3WJ motifs in biological RNA

There are many 3WJ motifs in biological RNA, some of which are stabilized by extensive tertiary interactions and non-canonical base pairings and base stacking[35-40]. To assess whether the properties of the 3WJ-pRNA core are unique, we thoroughly investigated the assembly and stability of 25 3WJ motifs (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2) reported in the literature[35,39,41-43]. It was found that 14 of the 25 motifs were impractical to study using core sequences, for example, some of them were too short (less than 10-nt for one of their fragments) for chemical synthesis. Using synthesized RNA fragments with the exact sequences as reported, with appropriate controls, the other 11 motifs were thoroughly investigated. Only six of the 11 structures assembled into a 3WJ complex, based on gel-shift assays (Table 1 and Fig.6). However, in presence of 8M urea, only the 3WJ-pRNA core and 3WJ-5S rRNA core were stable. The Alu SRP appears to have assembled; however, with appropriate controls (Supplementary Fig.1), it was found that the band was from the strong folding of one individual RNA fragment (a3WJ) by itself, rather than the assembly of a 3WJ.
Table 1

Comparison of biophysical properties of various 3WJ cores

FamilyNameSequence 5′-3′Assembly of 3WJ-RNA CoreAssembly of 3WJ- pRNA with three pRNA monomersTm(°C)
Native Gel8M Urea Denaturing GelNative Gel8M Urea Denaturing GelTMS Buffer
A 16s H34-H35-H38a) GGG GAC GAC GUCb) CGA GCG CAA CCC CCc) GUC GUC AGC UCGWeakNoYesNo45.3 ± 6.7
23s H75-H76- H79a) GAG GAC ACC GAb) GGC UCU CAC UCc) UCG CUG AGC CNoNoNoNo33.3 ± 0.6
B 23s H83-H84- H85a) AGC AAA AGA Ub) CCC GGC GAA GAG UGc) AUC UCA GCC GGGNoNoNoNo53.7 ± 0.6
C 5S rRNAa) CCC GGU UCG CCG CCAb) CCC ACC AGC GUU CCG GGc) AGG CGG CCA UAG CGG UGG GVery StrongVery StrongYesYes54.3 ± 3.1
G- Riboswitch (Type I)a) GGA CAU AUA AUC GCG UGb) AUG UCC GAC UAU GUC Cc) CAC GCA AGU UUC UAC CGG GCAMediumNoYesNo46.0 ± 3.5
TPP Riboswitch (Type II)a) GCG ACU CGG GGU GCC CUU Cb) GAA GGC UGA GAA AUA CCC GUA UCA CCU GAU CUG Gc) CCA GCG UAG GGA AGU CGCStrongNoYesNo52.0 ± 4.4
M-box Riboswitch (Type II)a) GAC GCC AAU GGG UCA ACA GAA AUC AUC Gb) AGG UGA UUU UUA AUG CAG CUc) ACG CUG CUG CCC AAA AAU GUCStrongNoYesNo45.3 ± 5.5
Hammerhead ribozymea) CUG UCA CCG GAUb) GGA CGA AAC AGc) UUC CGG UCU GAU GAG UCCNoNoNoNo49.7 ± 1.5
Alu SRPa) GGG CCG GGC GCG GUb) UCG GGA GGC UCc) GGC GCG CGC CUG UAG UCC CAG CNoNoNoNo45.3 ± 4.6
UnknownHCVa) UCA UGG UGU UCC GGA AAG CGCb) GUG AUG AGC CGA UCG UCA GAc) UCU GGU GAU ACC GAG ANoNoNoNo49.7 ± 1.5
pRNAa) UUG CCA UGU GUA UGU GGGb) CCC ACA UAC UUU GUU GAU CCc) GGA UCA AUC AUG GCA AVery StrongVery StrongYesYes58.0 ± 0.5

Note: The sequences of the 3WJ cores were obtained from References [35,39,41–43]. Families A, B and C are based on Lescoute and Westhof classification [39]. Other 14 3WJ cores that were not practical for thorough investigations are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Figure 6

Comparison of different 3WJ-RNA core

a, Assembly and stability of 11 3WJ-RNA core motifs assayed in 16% native (upper) and 16% 8M Urea (lower) PAGE gel. b, Melting curves for each of the 11 RNA 3WJ core motifs assembled from three oligos for each 3WJ motif under the physiological buffer TMS. Please refer to the Table 1 for the respective Tm values.

Moreover, 25 different RNA nanoparticles were constructed using each of the central 3WJ motifs as the scaffold to test their potential for constructing RNA nanoparticles harboring three functionalities with extended sequences (Sup Fig.2). Here, we used individual phi29 pRNA subunits as modules[3,23-26]. The sequences for each of the three oligos comprising individual 3WJ were placed at the 3′-end of the 117-nt pRNA, thereby serving as sticky ends. Upon co-transcription (of three pRNA strands harboring the sticky end sequences of the 3WJ, respectively) 10 of the 25 constructs were able to assemble into a 3WJ complex via the sticky ends representing the three fragments of the 3WJ, as demonstrated by gel shift assays (Supplementary Fig.2). However, only 2 of the constructs (3WJ-pRNA and 3WJ-5S rRNA) were resistant to 8M urea denaturation, which is consistent with the RNA oligo assembly data (Fig.6). These results suggest that only the 3WJ-5S rRNA is comparable to the 3WJ-pRNA, and therefore, the 3WJ-5S rRNA can also serve as a platform to organize RNA modules bearing different functionalities. To test whether the functionalities incorporated in the nanoparticles with the 3WJ core display catalytic or binding function, the HBV ribozyme and MG aptamer were incorporated into RNA nanocomplexes. Both the HBV ribozyme (Fig.4d, e) and the MG aptamer were functional after being incorporated into the 3WJ-pRNA or 3WJ-5S rRNA, respectively(Fig.4f, g), suggesting that the 3WJ-5S rRNA is comparable to 3WJ-pRNA for constructing complexes harboring different RNA functionalities for cell delivery. One of the most important parameters for evaluating therapeutic RNA nanoparticles is their thermodynamic stability under physiological conditions in vivo. Tm studies on three oligos for each of the 11 3WJ motif were conducted under the physiological buffer with 5-mM Mg and 100-mM NaCl at pH 7.6 (Fig.6 and Table 1). Among the assembled 3WJ structures, pRNA displayed the highest Tm of 58°C. The Tm closest to the 3WJ-pRNA was the 3WJ-5S rRNA with 54.3°C. The affinity and efficiency of assembly was further investigated by both gel retardation assay and melting experiments (data only shown for 3WJ-pRNA (Fig.2a, b), 3WJ-5S rRNA and 3WJ-Alu SRP cores (Sup Fig.1). The 3WJ-pRNA displayed a very smooth high-slope temperature dependant melting curve, and clean bands in the gel, clearly displaying the assembly of monomer, dimer and 3WJ with little or no residual RNA fragments (Fig.2a, b). The results suggest that the three components of the 3WJ-pRNA have a much higher affinity to interact favorably in comparison with any of the two components. Furthermore, the sharp melting transition indicates cooperative simultaneous folding of the three helical stems. In contrast, the 3WJ-5S rRNA and all other 3WJ motifs displayed temperature dependant curves with lower slopes. Titration of the three oligos of the 3WJ-5S rRNA system revealed that mixing of only two of the three RNA fragments resulted in the formation of a urea sensitive band with a migration rate even slower than the entire 3WJ complex (Sup Fig.1). This suggests that the individual fragment or their two-fragment combination of the 3WJ-5S rRNA might have undesired binding affinities that interfere with the final 3WJ assembly. Nevertheless, the affinity of the three-component interaction is sufficiently higher than the two-component interaction in the 3WJ-5S rRNA system to drive the assembly of the final 3WJ structure. For Alu SRP, the folding of the individual strands significantly interferes with the formation of the 3WJ and hence the complex does not assemble (Supplementary Fig.1). Although systematic comparison of assembly and stability of different 3WJs has not been studied, several studies concerning the Tm measurements of individual 3WJ motifs have been reported[44-48]. Some studies elucidate the thermodynamic factors that govern the folding of 3WJ RNA motifs, such as the hairpin ribozyme[45] and intact stem-loop mRNA[46]. Thermodynamic parameters of a variety of constructs (mutations and insertions) based on the structure and sequence of the 3Wj core of 5S-rRNA have been reported[44,47,48]. They utilized a two-strand system instead of the three fragments approach, and hence the results are not directly comparable. Nevertheless, their results are consistent with our findings. In conclusion, these results suggest that the phi29 3WJ domain has the potential to serve as a platform for the construction of RNA nanoparticles containing multiple functionalities for the delivery of therapeutics to specific cells for the treatment of cancer, viral infection, and genetic diseases. We thoroughly evaluated 25 3WJ motifs in biological RNA and identified 3WJ-5S rRNA as the only 3WJ motif comparable to 3WJ-pRNA for constructing complexes harboring different functionalities.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Construction of multi-module RNA nanoparticles

Sequences for each of the RNA strands a3wj, b3wj, and c3wj were added to the 3′-end of each 117-nt pRNA-Ab′ (Fig. 1e). The pRNA-a3WJ, pRNA-b3WJ, and pRNA-c3WJ were then synthesized in vitro by transcription of the corresponding DNA template by the T7 RNA polymerase. The 3WJ-pRNA harboring three monomeric pRNA were then self-assembled by mixing the three subunits in equal molar concentrations. Alternatively, the three individual templates can be co-transcribed and assembled in one step followed by purification in 8% native PAGE gel. The sequences for the siRNA, HBV ribozyme, malachite green (MG) binding aptamer and folate labeled RNA were rationally designed with the sequences of the strands a3WJ, b3WJ, and c3WJ, respectively (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 2). Multi-module 3WJ-pRNA-HBV ribozyme-Survivin siRNA-folate (3WJ-pRNA-siSur-Rz-FA) or 3WJ-pRNA-MG aptamer-Survivin siRNA-folate (3WJ-pRNA-siSur-MG-FA) was assembled from four individual fragments including a 26-nt folate-labeled RNA (Trilink) or folate-DNA strand (synthesized in house); and, chemically synthesized 21-nt siRNA or scramble siRNA anti-sense strand (IDT). The 106-nt strand harboring HBV ribozyme sequence or 96-nt strand harboring MG binding aptamer and the 41-nt strand holding the folate-DNA/RNA were transcribed from DNA template amplified by PCR (Supplementary Table 2). Fluorescent dyes were labeled on the 106-nt RNA strand by using the Label IT® siRNA Tracker Intracellular Localization Kit, Cy3™ (Mirus Bio LLC). The four RNA strands were mixed after purification in TMS buffer at equal molar ratio and then heated up to 80°C for 5 mins, followed by slow cooling to 4°C. The assembled nanoparticles were then purified from 8% native PAGE gel.

Competition assays and radiolabel chasing

Competition experiments were carried out in the presence of urea and at different temperatures as a function of time. The Cy3 labeled 3WJ-pRNA core [ab*c]3WJ was constructed using three RNA oligos, a3wj, Cy3-b3wj, and c3wj mixed at 1:1:1 molar ratio in DEPC treated water or TMS buffer.

Presence of urea

The concentration of the labeled [ab*c]3WJ was fixed while unlabeled b3WJ was incubated with the labeled [ab*c]3WJ for 30-min at room temperature in presence of variable concentrations of urea (0–6M). The samples were then loaded onto 16% native gel. Two concentration ratios were evaluated: [ab*c]3WJ: unlabeled b3WJ = 1:1 and 1:5.

Different temperatures

The concentration of the labeled [ab*c]3WJ was fixed, while varying concentration ratios of unlabeled b3WJ (1:0–1:1000) were incubated with the labeled [ab*c]3WJ for 30-min at 25°C, 37°C, and 55°C, respectively, before loaded onto 16% native gel.

Dilution assay to test dissociation at extremely low concentrations

The stability of the 3WJ-pRNA complex harboring three monomeric pRNA was evaluated by radiolabel assays. The purified [32P]-complexes were serial diluted from 40–160 pM in TMS buffer, and then loaded onto 8% native PAGE gel.

Melting Experiments

The melting experiments were conducted by monitoring the fluorescence of the 3WJ RNAs using the LightCycler® 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche). 1X SYBR Green I dye (Invitrogen) (emission 465–510nm), which binds double-stranded nucleic acids, but not single-stranded ones was used for all the experiments. The respective RNA oligonucleotides were mixed at room temperature in physiological TMS buffer. The 3WJ RNA samples were slowly cooled from 95°C to 20°C at the ramping rate of 0.11°C/sec. Data was analyzed by the LightCycler® 480 Software using the first derivative of the melting profile. The Tm value represents the mean and standard deviation from 3 independent experiments.

HBV ribozyme activity assay

HBV ribozyme is an RNA enzyme that cleaves the genomic RNA of the Hepatitis B Virus genome[11]. The HBV RNA substrate was radiolabeled by [α-32P] UTP (PerkinElmer, Inc) and incubated with the 3WJ-pRNA or 3WJ-5S rRNA core harboring HBV ribozyme at 37°C for 60 mins in a buffer containing 20 mM MgCl2, 20 mM NaCl, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. The pRNA/HBV ribozyme served as a positive control[11], and 3WJ RNA harboring MD aptamer was used as a negative control (Fig. 4). The samples were then loaded on 8M urea/10% PAGE gel for autoradiograph.

Malachite green (MG) aptamer fluorescence assay

3WJ-pRNA or 3WJ-5S rRNA trivalent RNA nanoparticles harboring MG binding aptamer (100 nM)[30] was mixed with MG (2 μM) in binding buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and incubated at room temperature for 30 mins (Fig. 4f, g). The fluorescence was measured using a fluorospectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon), excited at 475-nm (540–800 nm scanning for emission) and 615-nm (625–800 nm scanning for emission). Methods for the synthesis and purification of pRNA; the construction and purification of pRNA complexes; the serum stability assays; flow cytometry analysis of folate mediated cell binding; the confocal microscopy imaging; the assay for the silencing of genes in cancer cell model; the stability and systemic pharmacokinetic analysis in animals[49]; the targeting of tumor xenograft by systemic injection in animals[49]; and the AFM imaging[50] can be found in Supplementary Information Section.
  50 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of RNA motifs.

Authors:  Neocles B Leontis; Eric Westhof
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Bottom-up Assembly of RNA Arrays and Superstructures as Potential Parts in Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Dan Shu; Wulf-Dieter Moll; Zhaoxiang Deng; Chengde Mao; Peixuan Guo
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.189

3.  Rapid preparation of single stranded DNA from PCR products by streptavidin induced electrophoretic mobility shift.

Authors:  N C Pagratis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A Fire; S Xu; M K Montgomery; S A Kostas; S E Driver; C C Mello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The proximate 5' and 3' ends of the 120-base viral RNA (pRNA) are crucial for the packaging of bacteriophage phi 29 DNA.

Authors:  C Zhang; C S Lee; P Guo
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs.

Authors:  Jürgen Soutschek; Akin Akinc; Birgit Bramlage; Klaus Charisse; Rainer Constien; Mary Donoghue; Sayda Elbashir; Anke Geick; Philipp Hadwiger; Jens Harborth; Matthias John; Venkitasamy Kesavan; Gary Lavine; Rajendra K Pandey; Timothy Racie; Kallanthottathil G Rajeev; Ingo Röhl; Ivanka Toudjarska; Gang Wang; Silvio Wuschko; David Bumcrot; Victor Koteliansky; Stefan Limmer; Muthiah Manoharan; Hans-Peter Vornlocher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Folate-mediated delivery of macromolecular anticancer therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Yingjuan Lu; Philip S Low
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Thermodynamic analysis of ligand binding and ligand binding-induced tertiary structure formation by the thiamine pyrophosphate riboswitch.

Authors:  Nadia Kulshina; Thomas E Edwards; Adrian R Ferré-D'Amaré
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  Construction of folate-conjugated pRNA of bacteriophage phi29 DNA packaging motor for delivery of chimeric siRNA to nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  S Guo; F Huang; P Guo
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  AFM for analysis of structure and dynamics of DNA and protein-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Yuri L Lyubchenko; Luda S Shlyakhtenko
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.608

View more
  181 in total

1.  siRNA delivery: Loaded-up microsponges.

Authors:  Wade W Grabow; Luc Jaeger
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 2.  Biological Nanomotors with a Revolution, Linear, or Rotation Motion Mechanism.

Authors:  Peixuan Guo; Hiroyuki Noji; Christopher M Yengo; Zhengyi Zhao; Ian Grainge
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Preparation and biomedical applications of programmable and multifunctional DNA nanoflowers.

Authors:  Yifan Lv; Rong Hu; Guizhi Zhu; Xiaobing Zhang; Lei Mei; Qiaoling Liu; Liping Qiu; Cuichen Wu; Weihong Tan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Strategies to Modulate MicroRNA Functions for the Treatment of Cancer or Organ Injury.

Authors:  Tae Jin Lee; Xiaoyi Yuan; Keith Kerr; Ji Young Yoo; Dong H Kim; Balveen Kaur; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Activatable Protein Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery of Therapeutic Peptides.

Authors:  Xi Yu; Xingchun Gou; Peng Wu; Liang Han; Daofeng Tian; Fengyi Du; Zeming Chen; Fuyao Liu; Gang Deng; Ann T Chen; Chao Ma; Jun Liu; Sara M Hashmi; Xing Guo; Xiaolong Wang; Haitian Zhao; Xinran Liu; Xudong Zhu; Kevin Sheth; Qianxue Chen; Louzhen Fan; Jiangbing Zhou
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  Multistrand RNA secondary structure prediction and nanostructure design including pseudoknots.

Authors:  Eckart Bindewald; Kirill Afonin; Luc Jaeger; Bruce A Shapiro
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  RNA nanotechnology for computer design and in vivo computation.

Authors:  Meikang Qiu; Emil Khisamutdinov; Zhengyi Zhao; Cheryl Pan; Jeong-Woo Choi; Neocles B Leontis; Peixuan Guo
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Delivery materials for siRNA therapeutics.

Authors:  Rosemary Kanasty; Joseph Robert Dorkin; Arturo Vegas; Daniel Anderson
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 43.841

9.  Fabrication of RNA 3D Nanoprisms for Loading and Protection of Small RNAs and Model Drugs.

Authors:  Emil F Khisamutdinov; Daniel L Jasinski; Hui Li; Kaiming Zhang; Wah Chiu; Peixuan Guo
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Overcoming Tamoxifen Resistance of Human Breast Cancer by Targeted Gene Silencing Using Multifunctional pRNA Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yijuan Zhang; Marissa Leonard; Yi Shu; Yongguang Yang; Dan Shu; Peixuan Guo; Xiaoting Zhang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.