Literature DB >> 21435387

Can non-viral technologies knockdown the barriers to siRNA delivery and achieve the next generation of cancer therapeutics?

Jianfeng Guo1, Ludovic Bourre, Declan M Soden, Gerald C O'Sullivan, Caitriona O'Driscoll.   

Abstract

Cancer is one of the most wide-spread diseases of modern times, with an estimated increase in the number of patients diagnosed worldwide, from 11.3 million in 2007 to 15.5 million in 2030 (www.who.int). In many cases, due to the delay in diagnosis and high increase of relapse, survival rates are low. Current therapies, including surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, have made significant progress, but they have many limitations and are far from ideal. Although immunotherapy has recently offered great promise as a new approach in cancer treatment, it is still very much in its infancy and more information on this approach is required before it can be widely applied. For these reasons effective, safe and patient-acceptable cancer therapy is still largely an unmet clinical need. Recent knowledge of the genetic basis of the disease opens up the potential for cancer gene therapeutics based on siRNA. However, the future of such gene-based therapeutics is dependent on achieving successful delivery. Extensive research is ongoing regarding the design and assessment of non-viral delivery technologies for siRNA to treat a wide range of cancers. Preliminary results on the first human Phase I trial for solid tumours, using a targeted non-viral vector, illustrate the enormous therapeutic benefits once the issue of delivery is resolved. In this review the genes regulating cancer will be discussed and potential therapeutic targets will be identified. The physiological and biochemical changes caused by tumours, and the potential to exploit this knowledge to produce bio-responsive 'smart' delivery systems, will be evaluated. This review will also provide a critical and comprehensive overview of the different non-viral formulation strategies under investigation for siRNA delivery, with particular emphasis on those designed to exploit the physiological environment of the disease site. In addition, a section of the review will be dedicated to pre-clinical animal models used to evaluate the stability, safety and efficacy of the delivery systems.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435387     DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Adv        ISSN: 0734-9750            Impact factor:   14.227


  25 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic biology with surgical precision: targeted reengineering of signaling proteins.

Authors:  Vsevolod V Gurevich; Eugenia V Gurevich
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.315

Review 2.  Strategies to target tumors using nanodelivery systems based on biodegradable polymers, aspects of intellectual property, and market.

Authors:  Michele F Oliveira; Pedro P G Guimarães; Alinne D M Gomes; Diego Suárez; Rubén D Sinisterra
Journal:  J Chem Biol       Date:  2012-11-30

3.  Inorganic nanovectors for nucleic acid delivery.

Authors:  Sandhya Pranatharthiharan; Mitesh D Patel; Anisha A D'Souza; Padma V Devarajan
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 4.  Lipid-based vectors for siRNA delivery.

Authors:  Shubiao Zhang; Defu Zhi; Leaf Huang
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.121

5.  Recombinant high density lipoprotein nanoparticles for target-specific delivery of siRNA.

Authors:  Mengjie Rui; Hailing Tang; Yan Li; Xiaohui Wei; Yuhong Xu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Combined effect of sCD40L and PI3K siRNA on transplanted tumours growth and microenvironment in nude mice with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Rui Li; Wei-Chang Chen; Xue-Qin Pang; Wen-Yan Tian; Wei-Peng Wang; Xue-Guang Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 7.  Tackling TAMs for Cancer Immunotherapy: It's Nano Time.

Authors:  Yishun Yang; Jianfeng Guo; Leaf Huang
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 14.819

8.  Release modeling and comparison of nanoarchaeosomal, nanoliposomal and pegylated nanoliposomal carriers for paclitaxel.

Authors:  Fatemeh Movahedi; Hasan Ebrahimi Shahmabadi; Seyed Ebrahim Alavi; Maedeh Koohi Moftakhari Esfahani
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-28

9.  Dynamic measurements of membrane insertion potential of synthetic cell penetrating peptides.

Authors:  Nabil A Alhakamy; Anubhav Kaviratna; Cory J Berkland; Prajnaparamita Dhar
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.882

10.  Study of toxicity effect of pegylated nanoliposomal artemisinin on breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  Neda Dadgar; Seyed Ebrahim Alavi; Maedeh Koohi Moftakhari Esfahani; Azim Akbarzadeh
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-02-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.