Literature DB >> 29389648

Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.

Keith A Wear, Yunbo Liu, Gerald R Harris.   

Abstract

Needle and fiber-optic hydrophones have frequency-dependent sensitivity, which can result in substantial distortion of nonlinear or broadband pressure pulses. A rigid cylinder model for needle and fiber-optic hydrophones was used to predict this distortion. The model was compared with measurements of complex sensitivity for a fiber-optic hydrophone and three needle hydrophones with sensitive element sizes ( ) of 100, 200, 400, and . Theoretical and experimental sensitivities agreed to within 12 ± 3% [root-mean-square (RMS) normalized magnitude ratio] and 8° ± 3° (RMS phase difference) for the four hydrophones over the range from 1 to 10 MHz. The model predicts that distortions in peak positive pressure can exceed 20% when and spectral index (SI) >7% and can exceed 40% when and SI >14%, where is the wavelength of the fundamental component and SI is the fraction of power spectral density contained in harmonics. The model predicts that distortions in peak negative pressure can exceed 15% when . Measurements of pulse distortion using a 2.25 MHz source and needle hydrophones with , 400, and agreed with the model to within a few percent on the average for SI values up to 14%. This paper 1) identifies conditions for which needle and fiber-optic hydrophones produce substantial distortions in acoustic pressure pulse measurements and 2) offers a practical deconvolution method to suppress these distortions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29389648      PMCID: PMC6103641          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2778566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  50 in total

1.  Rigid piston approximation for computing the transfer function and angular response of a fiber-optic hydrophone.

Authors:  J F Krückler; A Eisenberg; M Krix; R Lötsch; M Pessel; H G Trier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Transcranial ultrasound focus reconstruction with phase and amplitude correction.

Authors:  Jason White; Greg T Clement; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound fields by a fiber optic probe hydrophone.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Liang Zhai; Rebecca Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evaluation of uncertainty for regularized deconvolution: A case study in hydrophone measurements.

Authors:  S Eichstädt; V Wilkens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Quantifying Image Quality Improvement Using Elevated Acoustic Output in B-Mode Harmonic Imaging.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Gregg E Trahey; Clare M Haystead; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Analyzing the Impact of Increasing Mechanical Index and Energy Deposition on Shear Wave Speed Reconstruction in Human Liver.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Stephen J Rosenzweig; Manal F Abdelmalek; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Effects on nonlinearity on the estimation of in situ values of acoustic output parameters.

Authors:  T L Szabo; F Clougherty; C Grossman
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Navid Farr; Ari Partanen; Michael R Bailey; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Development of calibration techniques for ultrasonic hydrophone probes in the frequency range from 1 to 100 MHz.

Authors:  S Umchid; R Gopinath; K Srinivasan; P A Lewin; A S Daryoush; L Bansal; M El-Sherif
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  A comparison of acoustic cavitation detection thresholds measured with piezo-electric and fiber-optic hydrophone sensors.

Authors:  Victoria Bull; John Civale; Ian Rivens; Gail Ter Haar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  9 in total

1.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of a Reflectance-Based Fiber-Optic Hydrophone: Predictions From Theoretical Models Compared With Measurements.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Needle Hydrophones: Predictions From Four Theoretical Forms Compared With Measurements.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.725

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.