Literature DB >> 9952078

Effects on nonlinearity on the estimation of in situ values of acoustic output parameters.

T L Szabo1, F Clougherty, C Grossman.   

Abstract

Water can generate extreme waveform distortion compared to tissue, as indicated by the Goldberg number for water, which is 20 times larger than that of tissue at typical diagnostic ultrasound levels. This result was demonstrated by using tofu as a tissue mimicking material. By adjusting transducer voltage drive levels in water to match the peak rarefactional pressures in water to those of waveforms in tofu, a close correspondence was obtained for the peak compressional pressure and time average intensity with depth. A poorer correspondence was found by comparing tofu waveforms with water waveforms that were compensated for broadband attenuation and driven at the same voltage level as tofu. A simplified broadband derating factor, allowing for band-width adjustment, was shown to be more accurate than the standard monochromatic derating. Several new indicators for quantifying the degree of observed nonlinearity are suggested: a field based nonlinearity parameter, a peak pressure ratio pc/pr, and a second harmonic to fundamental frequency spectral ratio. These indicators may have the potential for more consistent characterization of nonlinear relationships among output parameters and drive levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9952078     DOI: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  7 in total

1.  A DERATING METHOD FOR THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND.

Authors:  O V Bessonova; V A Khokhlova; M S Canney; M R Bailey; L A Crum
Journal:  Acoust Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 0.856

2.  Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Keith A Wear; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Acoustic droplet vaporization is initiated by superharmonic focusing.

Authors:  Oleksandr Shpak; Martin Verweij; Hendrik J Vos; Nico de Jong; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Acoustic Droplet Vaporization in Acoustically Responsive Scaffolds: Effects of Frequency of Excitation, Volume Fraction and Threshold Determination Method.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Xiaofang Lu; Oliver D Kripfgans; J Brian Fowlkes; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Conditionally Increased Acoustic Pressures in Nonfetal Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations Without Contrast Agents: A Preliminary Assessment.

Authors:  Kathryn R Nightingale; Charles C Church; Gerald Harris; Keith A Wear; Michael R Bailey; Paul L Carson; Hui Jiang; Kurt L Sandstrom; Thomas L Szabo; Marvin C Ziskin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Navid Farr; Ari Partanen; Michael R Bailey; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.