Literature DB >> 24035410

A comparison of acoustic cavitation detection thresholds measured with piezo-electric and fiber-optic hydrophone sensors.

Victoria Bull1, John Civale, Ian Rivens, Gail Ter Haar.   

Abstract

A Fabry-Perot interferometer fiber-optic hydrophone (FOH) was investigated for use as an acoustic cavitation detector and compared with a piezo-ceramic passive cavitation detector (PCD). Both detectors were used to measure negative pressure thresholds for broadband emissions in 3% agar and ex vivo bovine liver simultaneously. FOH-detected half- and fourth-harmonic emissions were also studied. Three thresholds were defined and investigated: (i) onset of cavitation; (ii) 100% probability of cavitation; and (iii) a time-integrated threshold where broadband signals integrated over a 3-s exposure duration, averaged over 5-10 repeat exposures, become statistically significantly greater than noise. The statistical sensitiviy of FOH broadband detection was low compared with that of the PCD (0.43/0.31 in agar/liver). FOH-detected fourth-harmonic data agreed best with PCD broadband (sensitivity: 0.95/0.94, specificity: 0.89/0.76 in agar/liver). The FOH has potential as a cavitation detector, particularly in applications where space is limited or during magnetic resonance-guided studies.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cavitation thresholds; Fiber-optic hydrophone; Focused ultrasound surgery; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Passive cavitation detection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24035410     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  5 in total

1.  Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Keith A Wear; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Yunbo Liu; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Focused Ultrasound-Induced Cavitation Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Radiation Therapy and Hyperthermia.

Authors:  Shaonan Hu; Xinrui Zhang; Michael Unger; Ina Patties; Andreas Melzer; Lisa Landgraf
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Pulsed focused ultrasound can improve the anti-cancer effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in murine pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Petros X E Mouratidis; Marcia Costa; Ian Rivens; Elizabeth E Repasky; Gail Ter Haar
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.118

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.