Literature DB >> 16938956

Measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound fields by a fiber optic probe hydrophone.

Yufeng Zhou1, Liang Zhai, Rebecca Simmons, Pei Zhong.   

Abstract

The acoustic fields of a high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) transducer operating either at its fundamental (1.1 MHz) or third harmonic (3.3 MHz) frequency were measured by a fiber optic probe hydrophone (FOPH). At 1.1 MHz when the electric power applied to the transducer was increased from 1.6 to 125 W, the peak positive/negative pressures at the focus were measured to be p(+) = 1.7-23.3 MPa and p(-) = -1.2(-) -10.0 MPa. The corresponding spatial-peak pulse-average (I(SPPA)) and spatial-average pulse-average (I(SAPA)) intensities were I(SPPA) =77-6000 W/cm2 and I(SAPA) = 35-4365 W/cm2. Nonlinear propagation with harmonics generation was dominant at high intensities, leading to a reduced -6 dB beam size (L x W) of the compressional wave (11.5 x 1.8-8.8 1.04 mm) but an increased beam size of the rarefactional wave (12.5 x 1.6-13.2 x 2.0 mm). Enhancement ratio of absorbed power density in water increased from 1.0 to 3.0. In comparison, the HIFU transducer working at 3.3 MHz produced higher peak pressures (p(+) = 3.0-35.1 MPa and p(-) = -2.5(-) - 13.8 MPa) with smaller beam size (0.5 x 4 mm). Overall, FOPH was found to be a convenient and reliable tool for HIFU exposimetry measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938956      PMCID: PMC1994996          DOI: 10.1121/1.2214131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Production of harmonics in vitro by high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  R L Clarke; G R ter Haar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Modeling of high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced lesions in the presence of cavitation bubbles

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro.

Authors:  M R Bailey; L N Couret; O A Sapozhnikov; V A Khokhlova; G ter Haar; S Vaezy; X Shi; R Martin; L A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Measurements of ultrasonic fields with optical diffraction tomography.

Authors:  A Holm; H W Persson; K Lindström
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  The intensity dependence of the site of maximal energy deposition in focused ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  N A Watkin; G R ter Haar; I Rivens
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Preliminary results of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using focused ultrasound in the treatment of localised tumours.

Authors:  A G Visioli; I H Rivens; G R ter Haar; A Horwich; R A Huddart; E Moskovic; A Padhani; J Glees
Journal:  Eur J Ultrasound       Date:  1999-03

7.  Lesion development in focused ultrasound surgery: a general model.

Authors:  C R Hill; I Rivens; M G Vaughan; G R ter Haar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  A theoretical study of nonlinear effects with focused ultrasound in tissues: an "acoustic bragg peak".

Authors:  W Swindell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Pathological changes in human malignant carcinoma treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  F Wu; W Z Chen; J Bai; J Z Zou; Z L Wang; H Zhu; Z B Wang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  MRI-guided gas bubble enhanced ultrasound heating in in vivo rabbit thigh.

Authors:  S D Sokka; R King; K Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  23 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced lipolysis on cadaveric abdominal and thigh skin.

Authors:  Sugun Lee; Hee-Jin Kim; Hyun Jun Park; Hyoung Moon Kim; So Hyun Lee; Sung Bin Cho
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Rapid quantitative imaging of high intensity ultrasonic pressure fields.

Authors:  Huiwen Luo; Jiro Kusunose; Gianmarco Pinton; Charles F Caskey; William A Grissom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  High intensity focused ultrasound in clinical tumor ablation.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Zhou
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10

4.  HIFU Power Monitoring Using Combined Instantaneous Current and Voltage Measurement.

Authors:  Chris Adams; James R McLaughlan; Thomas M Carpenter; Steven Freear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Nonlinear Acoustics in Ultrasound Metrology and other Selected Applications.

Authors:  Peter A Lewin
Journal:  Phys Procedia       Date:  2010-01-01

6.  Shock-induced heating and millisecond boiling in gels and tissue due to high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael S Canney; Vera A Khokhlova; Olga V Bessonova; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Development of calibration techniques for ultrasonic hydrophone probes in the frequency range from 1 to 100 MHz.

Authors:  S Umchid; R Gopinath; K Srinivasan; P A Lewin; A S Daryoush; L Bansal; M El-Sherif
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Activation of transgene expression in skeletal muscle by focused ultrasound.

Authors:  X Lu; G Sankin; E C Pua; J Madden; P Zhong
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  HIFU Drive System Miniaturization Using Harmonic Reduced Pulsewidth Modulation.

Authors:  Chris Adams; Thomas M Carpenter; David Cowell; Steven Freear; James R McLaughlan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.