Literature DB >> 29365078

Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld1, Edward K Vogel1.   

Abstract

In order to efficiently process incoming visual information, selective attention acts as a filter that enhances relevant and suppresses irrelevant information. In this study, we used an event-related potential (ERP) approach with systematic lateralization to investigate enhancement and suppression during encoding of information into visual working memory (WM) separately. We used a change detection task in which observers had to memorize some items while ignoring other items. We found that the to-be-ignored items elicited a PD component in the ERP, suggesting that irrelevant information is actively suppressed from WM. The PD amplitude increased with distractor load and decreased with the ability to group distractors according to Gestalt principles. This suggests that the PD can be used as an indicator of how efficiently items can be suppressed from entering WM. Furthermore, while lateral memory-targets elicited a "traditional" CDA (starting ~300 ms), lateral memory-distractors elicited a sustained positivity contralateral to memory-distractors (CDAp, starting ~400 ms). In sum the results suggest that inhibition of irrelevant information is an important factor for efficient WM and is reflected in spontaneous (PD) and sustained suppression (CDAp).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29365078      PMCID: PMC6497094          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  67 in total

1.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Feature priming and the capture of visual attention: linking two ambiguity resolution hypotheses.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Chris Olivers; Martijn Meeter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; John Hodsoll; Pia Rotshtein; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Context heterogeneity has a sustained impact on attention deployment: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Agnieszka Wykowska; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Colour-specific differences in attentional deployment for equiluminant pop-out colours: evidence from lateralised potentials.

Authors:  Vincent Jetté Pomerleau; Ulysse Fortier-Gauthier; Isabelle Corriveau; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Pierre Jolicœur
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Been there, seen that: a neural mechanism for performing efficient visual search.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; Fabrice Arcizet; Wei Song Ong; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.

Authors:  Caroline Barras; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Anna Schubö
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

10.  Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-10
View more
  16 in total

1.  Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

4.  Are auditory cues special? Evidence from cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.

Authors:  Lea Kern; Michael Niedeggen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.157

5.  Multivariate analysis reveals a generalizable human electrophysiological signature of working memory load.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Electrophysiological evidence that psychopathic personality traits are associated with atypical response to salient distractors.

Authors:  Patrick L Carolan; John M Gaspar; Killian Kleffner; Mario Liotti
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.

Authors:  Rebecca M Foerster; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-27

9.  Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  An Electrophysiological Dissociation of Encoding vs. Maintenance Failures in Visual-Spatial Working Memory.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Sebastian Korinth; Benjamin Peters; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.