Literature DB >> 33574729

Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Steven J Luck1, Nicholas Gaspelin2, Charles L Folk3, Roger W Remington4,5, Jan Theeuwes6.   

Abstract

For over 25 years, researchers have debated whether physically salient stimuli capture attention in an automatic manner, independent of the observer's goals, or whether the capture of attention depends on the match between a stimulus and the observer's task set. Recent evidence suggests an intermediate position in which salient stimuli automatically produce a priority signal, but the capture of attention can be prevented via an inhibitory mechanism that suppresses the salient stimulus. Here, proponents from multiple sides of the debate describe how their original views have changed in light of recent research, as well as remaining areas of disagreement. These perspectives highlight some emerging areas of consensus and provide new directions for future research on attentional capture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; attentional set; control; salience; suppression; visual search

Year:  2020        PMID: 33574729      PMCID: PMC7872136          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  110 in total

1.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.

Authors:  Charles L Folk; Andrew B Leber; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

2.  The role of relational information in contingent capture.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  John H R Maunsell; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

5.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the PD with Small Search Displays.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Nicolas Burra
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Neural predictors of within-subject fluctuations in attentional control.

Authors:  Andrew B Leber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  New objects do not capture attention without a sensory transient.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Daniel J Simons; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09

10.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  33 in total

1.  Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons.

Authors:  Owen J Adams; Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Time to Stop Calling it Attentional "Capture" and Embrace a Mechanistic Understanding of Attentional Priority.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-03-02

3.  Unconscious social relation threats: Invisible boss face biases attention.

Authors:  Yanliang Sun; Luzi Xu; Xinyu Luo; Yanju Ren; Xiaowei Ding
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Aniruddha Ramgir; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

5.  Spatial cueing effects do not always index attentional capture: evidence for a priority accumulation framework.

Authors:  Maya Darnell; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 6.  Priming of probabilistic attentional templates.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-07-13

7.  Habituation to abrupt-onset distractors with different spatial occurrence probability.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  This is a test: Oculomotor capture when the experiment keeps score.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Lana Mrkonja
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.157

9.  On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eric Ruthruff; Christopher Hauck
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-24

10.  Strategic Distractor Suppression Improves Selective Control in Human Vision.

Authors:  Wieske van Zoest; Christoph Huber-Huber; Matthew D Weaver; Clayton Hickey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.