Literature DB >> 21078309

Feature priming and the capture of visual attention: linking two ambiguity resolution hypotheses.

Clayton Hickey1, Chris Olivers, Martijn Meeter, Jan Theeuwes.   

Abstract

Visual search for a unique stimulus is often faster when the feature defining this target is repeated. Recent research has related this feature priming to ambiguity: priming effects appear stronger when the search target is perceptually ambiguous, as when the search array contains a salient distractor. Here we link the ambiguity that underlies feature priming to ambiguity in neural representation caused by the receptive field organization of visual cortex. We show that as the magnitude of neural activity involved in resolving perceptual ambiguity in early stages of visual cortex increases-indexed in posterior aspects of the N2pc component of the visual-event related potential--so does the behavioral feature priming effect. When ambiguity resolution mechanisms act strongly and the target repeats, target processing is facilitated. When these mechanisms act strongly, but the features that have previously defined the target come to characterize the distractor, attention is captured to the distractor location. These results suggest that ambiguity and the attentional mechanisms responsible for resolving it play central roles in feature priming.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21078309     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  7 in total

1.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Aniruddha Ramgir; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

3.  Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  When Does Feature Search Fail to Protect Against Attentional Capture?

Authors:  Tashina Graves; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-03-07

5.  Context and competition in the capture of visual attention.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Alex L White; Wanghaoming Fang; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  The Dopamine Prediction Error: Contributions to Associative Models of Reward Learning.

Authors:  Helen M Nasser; Donna J Calu; Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Melissa J Sharpe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.