Literature DB >> 33653697

Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld1, Marina Weinberger2, Edward Awh2,3.   

Abstract

Past work has demonstrated that active suppression of salient distractors is a critical part of visual selection. Evidence for goal-driven suppression includes below-baseline visual encoding at the position of salient distractors (Gaspelin and Luck, 2018) and neural signals such as the distractor positivity (Pd) that track how many distractors are presented in a given hemifield (Feldmann-Wüstefeld and Vogel, 2019). One basic question regarding distractor suppression is whether it is inherently spatial or nonspatial in character. Indeed, past work has shown that distractors evoke both spatial (Theeuwes, 1992) and nonspatial forms of interference (Folk and Remington, 1998), motivating a direct examination of whether space is integral to goal-driven distractor suppression. Here, we use behavioral and EEG data from adult humans (male and female) to provide clear evidence for a spatial gradient of suppression surrounding salient singleton distractors. Replicating past work, both reaction time and neural indices of target selection improved monotonically as the distance between target and distractor increased. Importantly, these target selection effects were paralleled by a monotonic decline in the amplitude of the Pd, an electrophysiological index of distractor suppression. Moreover, multivariate analyses revealed spatially selective activity in the θ-band that tracked the position of the target and, critically, revealed suppressed activity at spatial channels centered on distractor positions. Thus, goal-driven selection of relevant over irrelevant information benefits from a spatial gradient of suppression surrounding salient distractors.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Past work has shown that distractor suppression is an important part of goal-driven attentional selection, but has not yet revealed whether suppression is spatially directed. Using behavioral data, event-related potentials (ERPs) of the EEG signal [N2pc and distractor positivity (Pd) component], as well as a multivariate model of EEG data [channel tuning functions (CTF)], we show that suppression-related neural activity increases monotonically as the distance between targets and distractors decreases, and that spatially-selective activity in the θ-band reveals depressed activity in spatial channels that index distractor positions. Thus, we provide robust evidence for spatially-guided distractor suppression, a result that has important implications for models of goal-driven attentional control.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Pd; attentional capture; multivariate models; suppression; visual attention

Year:  2021        PMID: 33653697      PMCID: PMC8026355          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  61 in total

1.  Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.

Authors:  Peter A Starreveld; Jan Theeuwes; Karen Mortier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture.

Authors:  C L Folk; R Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  What is top-down about contingent capture?

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Daniel Schreij; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.

Authors:  Nicolas Burra; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  The same-location cost is unrelated to attentional settings: an object-updating account.

Authors:  Tomer Carmel; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Alpha-band Activity Tracks the Zoom Lens of Attention.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: an ERP study.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss; Clare Press; Disa Sauter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Effects of eccentricity on the attention-related N2pc component of the event-related potential waveform.

Authors:  Orestis Papaioannou; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  3 in total

1.  Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons.

Authors:  Owen J Adams; Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Classic Visual Search Effects in an Additional Singleton Task: An Open Dataset.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Titiksha Patel; Nicole Rangan; John T Serences
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-07-28

3.  Learned distractor rejection persists across target search in a different dimension.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.