Literature DB >> 23650629

Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.

Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld1, Anna Schubö.   

Abstract

Homogeneous contexts were shown to result in prioritized processing of embedded targets compared to heterogeneous contexts (Duncan & Humphreys, 1989). The present experiment used behavioral and ERP measures to examine whether context homogeneity affects both enhancing relevant information and inhibiting irrelevant in contexts of varying homogeneity. Targets and distractors were presented laterally or on the vertical midline which allowed disentangling target- and distractor-related activity in the lateralized ERP (Hickey, diLollo, & McDonald, 2009). In homogeneous contexts, targets elicited an NT component from 150 ms on and a PD component from 200 ms on, showing early attention deployment at target locations and active suppression of distractors. In heterogeneous contexts, an NT component was also found from 150 ms on and PD was found from 250 ms on, suggesting delayed suppression of the distractor. Before 250 ms, distractors in heterogeneous contexts elicited a contralateral negativity, indicating attentional capture of the distractor prior to active suppression. In sum the present results suggest that top-down control of attention is more pronounced in homogeneous than in heterogeneous contexts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N2pc; bottom-up; distractor-positivity; homogeneity; target-negativity; top-down; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23650629     DOI: 10.1167/13.3.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  12 in total

1.  Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  EEG signatures of contextual influences on visual search with real scenes.

Authors:  Amir H Meghdadi; Barry Giesbrecht; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Action Planning Mediates Guidance of Visual Attention from Working Memory.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Anna Schubö
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Naso-Temporal Asymmetries: Suppression of Emotional Faces in the Temporal Visual Hemifield.

Authors:  David Framorando; Mylène Bapst; Nathalie Vuille; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Reduced visual attention in heterogeneous textures is reflected in occipital alpha and theta band activity.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Makoto Miyakoshi; Marco Alessandro Petilli; Anna Schubö; Scott Makeig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Changes of Attention during Value-Based Reversal Learning Are Tracked by N2pc and Feedback-Related Negativity.

Authors:  Mariann Oemisch; Marcus R Watson; Thilo Womelsdorf; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.