Literature DB >> 27756581

Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference.

Caroline Barras1, Dirk Kerzel2.   

Abstract

In visual search for a shape target, interference from salient-but-irrelevant color singletons can be resisted in feature search mode, but not in singleton detection mode. In singleton detection mode, we observed a contralateral positivity (PD) after 260-340ms, suggesting that the salient distractor was suppressed. Because RTs in singleton detection mode increased when a distractor was present, we conclude that active suppression of distractors takes time. In feature search mode, no increase in RTs and no PD to the distractor was observed, showing that resistance to interference was not accomplished by suppression. Rather, the smaller N2pc to the target in feature search than in singleton detection mode suggests that enhancement of target features avoided interference. Thus, the strong top-down set in feature search mode eliminated the need to suppress the early attend-to-me signal (corresponding to the Ppc, from 160 to 210ms) that was generated by salient stimuli independently of search mode.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Attentional selection; Feature search; N2pc; P(D); Ppc; Search mode; Singleton detection; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27756581     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  9 in total

1.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

3.  On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eric Ruthruff; Christopher Hauck
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 5.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-12-01

7.  Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.

Authors:  Kenji Yamauchi; Takayuki Osugi; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-16

8.  Subtle Distinctions: How Attentional Templates Influence EEG Parameters of Cognitive Control in a Spatial Cuing Paradigm.

Authors:  Christine Mertes; Daniel Schneider
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Statistical learning in visual search reflects distractor rarity, not only attentional suppression.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Chiara Balbiani; Sarah Rosa; Stanislas Huynh Cong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.