Literature DB >> 23233157

Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Anastasia Kiyonaga1, Tobias Egner.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) and attention have been studied as separate cognitive constructs, although it has long been acknowledged that attention plays an important role in controlling the activation, maintenance, and manipulation of representations in WM. WM has, conversely, been thought of as a means of maintaining representations to voluntarily guide perceptual selective attention. It has more recently been observed, however, that the contents of WM can capture visual attention, even when such internally maintained representations are irrelevant, and often disruptive, to the immediate external task. Thus, the precise relationship between WM and attention remains unclear, but it appears that they may bidirectionally impact one another, whether or not internal representations are consistent with the external perceptual goals. This reciprocal relationship seems, further, to be constrained by limited cognitive resources to handle demands in either maintenance or selection. We propose here that the close relationship between WM and attention may be best described as a give-and-take interdependence between attention directed toward either actively maintained internal representations (traditionally considered WM) or external perceptual stimuli (traditionally considered selective attention), underpinned by their shared reliance on a common cognitive resource. Put simply, we argue that WM and attention should no longer be considered as separate systems or concepts, but as competing and influencing one another because they rely on the same limited resource. This framework can offer an explanation for the capture of visual attention by irrelevant WM contents, as well as a straightforward account of the underspecified relationship between WM and attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23233157      PMCID: PMC3594067          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  100 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Neural integration of top-down spatial and feature-based information in visual search.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Jim M P Monti; Emily H Trittschuh; Christina A Wieneke; Joy Hirsch; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  The influence of perceptual training on working memory in older adults.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Wesley C Clapp; Joseph L Hardy; Peter B Delahunt; Henry W Mahncke; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  82 in total

1.  Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Emma Wu Dowd; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Paying attention to working memory: Similarities in the spatial distribution of attention in mental and physical space.

Authors:  Muhammet Ikbal Sahan; Tom Verguts; Carsten Nicolas Boehler; Gilles Pourtois; Wim Fias
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

3.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

4.  Switching between filter settings reduces the efficient utilization of visual working memory.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-06-23

7.  Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.

Authors:  Koeun Jung; Suk Won Han; Yoonki Min
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

Review 8.  Switching attention from internal to external information processing: A review of the literature and empirical support of the resource sharing account.

Authors:  Sam Verschooren; Sebastian Schindler; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

9.  Exercise modulates the interaction between cognition and anxiety in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany R Lago; Abigail Hsiung; Brooks P Leitner; Courtney J Duckworth; Nicholas L Balderston; Kong Y Chen; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2018-07-23

10.  Comparing the Effects of 10-Hz Repetitive TMS on Tasks of Visual STM and Attention.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Jeffrey S Johnson; David W Sutterer; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.