Literature DB >> 31617823

Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption.

Nicole Hakim1, Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld2, Edward Awh1, Edward K Vogel1.   

Abstract

Working memory maintains information so that it can be used in complex cognitive tasks. A key challenge for this system is to maintain relevant information in the face of task-irrelevant perturbations. Across two experiments, we investigated the impact of task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory. We recorded EEG activity in humans while they performed a working memory task. On a subset of trials, we interrupted participants with salient but task-irrelevant objects. To track the impact of these task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory, we measured two well-characterized, temporally sensitive EEG markers that reflect active, prioritized working memory representations: the contralateral delay activity and lateralized alpha power (8-12 Hz). After interruption, we found that contralateral delay activity amplitude momentarily sustained but was gone by the end of the trial. Lateralized alpha power was immediately influenced by the interrupters but recovered by the end of the trial. This suggests that dissociable neural processes contribute to the maintenance of working memory information and that brief irrelevant onsets disrupt two distinct online aspects of working memory. In addition, we found that task expectancy modulated the timing and magnitude of how these two neural signals responded to task-irrelevant interruptions, suggesting that the brain's response to task-irrelevant interruption is shaped by task context.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31617823      PMCID: PMC7310497          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  36 in total

1.  The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory.

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; David W Sutterer; John T Serences; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Alpha-band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection.

Authors:  Gregor Thut; Annika Nietzel; Stephan A Brandt; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Interactions between attention and memory.

Authors:  Marvin M Chun; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.

Authors:  Hermann J Müller; Thomas Geyer; Michael Zehetleitner; Joseph Krummenacher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Dissecting the Neural Focus of Attention Reveals Distinct Processes for Spatial Attention and Object-Based Storage in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Kirsten C S Adam; Eren Gunseli; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-02-28

7.  Suppression of salient objects prevents distraction in visual search.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; John J McDonald
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The costly filtering of potential distraction: evidence for a supramodal mechanism.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Leonardo Chelazzi; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-09-17

9.  Contralateral Delay Activity Indexes Working Memory Storage, Not the Current Focus of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Visual short-term memory capacity predicts the "bandwidth" of visual long-term memory encoding.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Active Working Memory and Simple Cognitive Operations.

Authors:  Johanna Kreither; Orestis Papaioannou; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Inter-electrode correlations measured with EEG predict individual differences in cognitive ability.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel; Monica D Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Cat-astrophic effects of sudden interruptions on spatial auditory attention.

Authors:  Wusheng Liang; Christopher A Brown; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Neural correlates of a load-dependent decline in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yaju Li; Yasuki Noguchi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-04-09

6.  Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Salient distractors open the door of perception: alpha desynchronization marks sensory gating in a working memory task.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Fodor; Csilla Marosi; László Tombor; Gábor Csukly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.