Zhengan Zhang1,2, Nilkamal Mahanta1,3, Graham A Hudson1, Douglas A Mitchell1,3, Wilfred A van der Donk1,2,3. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States. 2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States. 3. Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 1206 West Gregory Drive, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Abstract
The past decade has seen the discovery of four different classes of radical S-adenosylmethionine (rSAM) methyltransferases that methylate unactivated carbon centers. Whereas the mechanism of class A is well understood, the molecular details of methylation by classes B-D are not. In this study, we present detailed mechanistic investigations of the class C rSAM methyltransferase TbtI involved in the biosynthesis of the potent thiopeptide antibiotic thiomuracin. TbtI C-methylates a Cys-derived thiazole during posttranslational maturation. Product analysis demonstrates that two SAM molecules are required for methylation and that one SAM (SAM1) is converted to 5'-deoxyadenosine and the second SAM (SAM2) is converted to S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SAH). Isotope labeling studies show that a hydrogen is transferred from the methyl group of SAM2 to the 5'-deoxyadenosine of SAM1 and the other two hydrogens of the methyl group of SAM2 appear in the methylated product. In addition, a hydrogen appears to be transferred from the β-position of the thiazole to the methyl group in the product. We also show that the methyl protons in the product can exchange with solvent. A mechanism consistent with these observations is presented that differs from other characterized radical SAM methyltransferases.
The past decade has seen the discovery of four different classes of radical S-adenosylmethionine (rSAM) methyltransferases that methylate unactivated carbon centers. Whereas the mechanism of class A is well understood, the molecular details of methylation by classes B-D are not. In this study, we present detailed mechanistic investigations of the class CrSAM methyltransferase TbtI involved in the biosynthesis of the potent thiopeptide antibiotic thiomuracin. TbtIC-methylates a Cys-derived thiazole during posttranslational maturation. Product analysis demonstrates that two SAM molecules are required for methylation and that one SAM (SAM1) is converted to 5'-deoxyadenosine and the second SAM (SAM2) is converted to S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SAH). Isotope labeling studies show that a hydrogen is transferred from the methyl group of SAM2 to the 5'-deoxyadenosine of SAM1 and the other two hydrogens of the methyl group of SAM2 appear in the methylated product. In addition, a hydrogen appears to be transferred from the β-position of the thiazole to the methyl group in the product. We also show that the methyl protons in the product can exchange with solvent. A mechanism consistent with these observations is presented that differs from other characterized radical SAM methyltransferases.
For many decades, methyl
transfer in nature utilizing S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) as the methyl donor was thought
to occur exclusively by SN2-like processes.[1] However, early metabolic labeling studies suggested that
methyl groups derived from methionine, are also transferred to non-nucleophilic
carbons.[2−5] Subsequent characterization of the biosynthetic gene clusters[6−9] and bioinformatic and biochemical analyses of the proteins involved
in these reactions[10,11] showed that they are part of
the radical SAM (rSAM) superfamily of enzymes,[12] which comprise the largest enzyme superfamily known.[13,14] In the years since this groundbreaking discovery, four distinct
classes of rSAM methyltransferases (MTs) have been identified that
differ in their cofactor/cosubstrate requirements and their proposed
reaction mechanisms.[15−18] The mechanism of RNA base methylases (class A) has been well-studied
(Figure S1),[19−23] but the mechanisms of the other three classes are
considerably less understood. Class B consists of cobalamin-dependent
methyltransferases, including TsrM,[24,25] Fom3,[10,26,27] GenK,[28] CysS,[29] ThnK,[11] Sven0516,[30] and PoyC.[31] Class C are cobalamin-independent and are involved in the
biosynthesis of several natural products,[32−36] whereas class D enzymes use methylenetetrahydrofolate
as the methyl group donor.[37] In this study,
we undertook a detailed mechanistic investigation of a class CrSAM
MT (TbtI) involved in the biosynthesis of the thiopeptide thiomuracin
(Figure a), and showed
that it uses a fundamentally different mechanism from other characterized
classes of rSAM MTs.
Figure 1
Product analysis for the methyl transfer reaction catalyzed
by
TbtI. (a) Structure of thiomuracin A1. The methyl group that is introduced
by TbtI is shown in red. (b) Regioselective methylation of the thiazole
at position 4 of the TbtA core peptide by TbtI. The Val-Gly-Ala sequence
at the N-terminus of peptide 1 originates from the leader
peptide.[36] (c) Time-dependent formation
of the methylated TbtA peptide, 5′-dA, and SAH. Reaction mixtures
included the following components: TbtA hexazole (50 μM), [4Fe–4S]
cluster reconstituted TbtI (10 μM), SAM (1 mM), flavodoxin (10
μM), flavodoxin reductase (10 μM), NAPDH (2 mM) in reaction
buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5).
Product analysis for the methyl transfer reaction catalyzed
by
TbtI. (a) Structure of thiomuracin A1. The methyl group that is introduced
by TbtI is shown in red. (b) Regioselective methylation of the thiazole
at position 4 of the TbtA core peptide by TbtI. The Val-Gly-Ala sequence
at the N-terminus of peptide 1 originates from the leader
peptide.[36] (c) Time-dependent formation
of the methylated TbtA peptide, 5′-dA, and SAH. Reaction mixtures
included the following components: TbtA hexazole (50 μM), [4Fe–4S]
cluster reconstituted TbtI (10 μM), SAM (1 mM), flavodoxin (10
μM), flavodoxin reductase (10 μM), NAPDH (2 mM) in reaction
buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5).
Results
TbtI Contains One Iron–Sulfur Cluster and Does Not Require
Additional Cysteines
We recently reported the in
vitro reconstitution of TbtI, which regioselectively C-methylates one of six thiazoles during the biosynthesis
of thiomuracin (Figure b).[36] Although sequence analysis does
not place TbtI among class A rSAM MTs, we nevertheless first assessed
whether TbtI might employ a similar mechanism. Class A rSAM MTs utilize
an unusual mechanism in which a methyl group from SAM is first transferred
to a Cys on the protein.[20] Then, reductive
cleavage of a second SAM molecule occurs, mediated by a reduced iron–sulfur
[4Fe–4S] cluster, which generates a 5′-deoxyadenosyl
radical (5′-dA•). The 5′-dA• species then
abstracts a hydrogen atom from the methylcysteine to initiate the
methyl transfer process (Figure S1). We
first analyzed the sequence of TbtI and its orthologs from various
thiopeptide gene clusters[36] and identified
five conserved Cys residues (Cys14, Cys18, Cys21, Cys254, and Cys343; Figure S2). Three of these appear in a canonical
motif (CxxxCxxC), which typically supply the ligands for a characteristic
rSAM [4Fe–4S] cluster.[12] TbtI variants
in which these Cys residues were replaced by Ala (C14A, C18A, and
C21A) were inactive (Figure S3), but substitution
of the remaining Cys residues (C89A, C254A, and C343A) did not adversely
affect the activity of TbtI (Figure S3),
suggesting that they are functionally dispensable.Thus, these
data show that unlike class A rSAM MTs, which require at least two
additional Cys other than the three used to bind the [4Fe–4S]
cluster,[22] TbtI does not require additional
Cys residues for catalysis. This conclusion is further supported by
the fact that a TbtI homologue involved in nocathiacin biosynthesis
(NocN) contains only one additional Cys other than the three involved
in [4Fe–4S] cluster coordination.[15] We considered that a methyl group from SAM could be transferred
to an amino acid residue other than Cys. To test this possibility,
the enzyme was treated with 14CH3-SAM and the
peptide substrate without addition of reducing agents. The enzyme
was isolated and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and visualized by Coomassie staining
or autoradiographic imaging. We did not observe a radioactive band
for the protein, suggesting that the methyl group is not initially
transferred to the enzyme. This finding could also be explained by
a methyl group already being present on the enzyme upon isolation
from Escherichia coli; however, single turnover experiments
presented below argue against this possibility. We cannot completely
rule out that transfer of the methyl group from SAM to an amino acid
residue only occurs in the presence of all reaction components including
reductants. TbtI lacks the cobalamin-binding motif characteristic
of class B rSAM MTs,[11,12,24,29,31,38−41] as well as the tetrahydrofolate-binding domain observed
in a recently discovered class D rSAM MT.[37] All of these factors point toward a distinct mechanism for TbtI.
Product Analysis
To gain insight into the mechanism
of methyl transfer, we first determined the products of the reaction
that are derived from SAM. Out of a concern that the strong reductant
dithionite might react with the initial products of the enzymatic
reaction, we replaced dithionite in our original assay[36] with flavodoxin/flavodoxin reductase and NADPH
to deliver the reducing equivalents to TbtI (see the Experimental Section). As anticipated on the basis of other
rSAM proteins,[42] 5′-deoxyadenosine
(5′-dA) was detected in slightly more than one equivalent compared
to the methylated TbtA product (Figure c). Additionally, S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SAH) was detected in near stoichiometric quantities,
and 5′-dA and SAH were formed at very similar rates (Figure c). When the reaction
was conducted with CD3-SAM (96% CD3 by ESI-MS;
see the Supporting Information, Figure S4), ∼90% of the 5′-dA contained a single deuterium (Figure S4b), suggesting that the 5′-dA•
generated from SAM1 may abstract a hydrogen atom from another SAM
molecule (SAM2) during catalysis. It also suggests that the small
amount of unlabeled 5′-dA produced was the result of uncoupled
SAM cleavage, as has been observed in other rSAM enzymes.[42] Control experiments showed that production of
SAH and 5′-dA was dependent on the presence of both TbtI and
the reducing system (Figure S5). It was
recently reported that another class CrSAM MT involved in nosiheptide
biosynthesis (NosN) produces thioadenosine in its reaction.[34] We therefore investigated if TbtI generated
thioadenosine; however, we were unable to observe its production by
LC-MS, whereas an authentic standard was readily detected at the concentrations
expected to be produced (Figure S5). Another
recent study on NosN also concluded that thioadenosine is not a product
of the reaction.[35] On the basis of the
products we observed, we formulated a series of working hypotheses
for the enzymatic mechanism of TbtI (Figure ).
Figure 2
Proposed potential reaction mechanisms for TbtI.
5′-dA•
is generated from SAM1 in a process mediated by the reduced [4Fe–4S]
cluster. The 5′-dA• then abstracts a hydrogen atom from
the methyl group of SAM2, and the resulting radical adds to the thiazole.
An active site base deprotonates radical 3, leading to
the elimination of SAH, yielding radical 4. Three different
pathways (a–c) can provide the product and
reset the enzyme. In pathway a, the radical is reduced
to the anion 5 and protonated. In pathway b, radical 4 abstracts a hydrogen atom from an active
site amino acid (X–H). X–H could be the protonated base
B–H. In pathway c, radical 4 abstracts
a hydrogen atom from the methyl group of 5′-dA. Ade = adenine.
Proposed potential reaction mechanisms for TbtI.
5′-dA•
is generated from SAM1 in a process mediated by the reduced [4Fe–4S]
cluster. The 5′-dA• then abstracts a hydrogen atom from
the methyl group of SAM2, and the resulting radical adds to the thiazole.
An active site base deprotonates radical 3, leading to
the elimination of SAH, yielding radical 4. Three different
pathways (a–c) can provide the product and
reset the enzyme. In pathway a, the radical is reduced
to the anion 5 and protonated. In pathway b, radical 4 abstracts a hydrogen atom from an active
site amino acid (X–H). X–H could be the protonated base
B–H. In pathway c, radical 4 abstracts
a hydrogen atom from the methyl group of 5′-dA. Ade = adenine.
Isotope Labeling Studies
Involving the Methyl Group of SAM
To evaluate the proposed
mechanisms, we first investigated whether
thiazole methylation involves transfer of the intact methyl group
of SAM or a methylene group. Therefore, reactions with TbtI were carried
out using CD3-SAM. Owing to the large molecular weight
of the TbtA hexazole core substrate even after removal of most of
the leader peptide (three residues remain, Val-Gly-Ala) with endoproteinase
GluC (C71H85N19O19S6, [M + H]+ = 1700 Da), the numerous isotopologues
visible by mass spectrometry rendered isotope labeling studies difficult
to interpret. Therefore, we prepared the TbtA hexazole substrate from E. coli grown in minimal media using 13C-depleted
glucose and 15N-depleted (NH4)2SO4 as the sole carbon and nitrogen sources, and again removed
the majority of the leader peptide by treatment with endoproteinase
GluC. The resulting TbtA hexazole core peptide 1 (Figure b) was analyzed by
electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and exhibited a
much-simplified spectrum (Figure S6). Use
of CD3-SAM in a 16 h methylation assay with TbtI and peptide 1 resulted in an unexpectedly complicated mass spectrum for
the product in which ions were observed consistent with the addition
of CH3, CH2D, and CHD2 groups (Figure a, black spectrum).
These findings indicated that there was either an intermediate that
underwent considerable solvent exchange or the product exchanged with
solvent after initial formation (or both). To test the latter possibility,
we repeated the experiment with CD3-SAM and quenched the
reaction after only 1 h. The product was analyzed by ESI-MS, and an
ion was observed that was consistent with the transfer of a CD2H group (Figure a, blue spectrum). This product was purified by high performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC), exposed to the assay conditions for
the extended reaction time (16 h), reisolated, and then again analyzed
by ESI-MS. In agreement with the original findings, a complicated
mixture of product peptide was observed that corresponded to apparent
transfer of CH3, CH2D, and CHD2 (Figure S7). This exchange was dependent on the
presence of TbtI and SAM; replacing SAM with SAH did not result in
exchange. Thus, these experiments show that the initial product of
the reaction of TbtI with CD3-SAM and 1 mainly
contains a CD2H group but that the enzyme can exchange
the deuterium labels with protium from solvent. Unfortunately, the
large amounts of 5′-dA produced from the abortive cleavage
of SAM during the 16 h reactions precluded our ability to determine
if deuterium from the methyl group is transferred to the 5′-dA
during the exchange process.
Figure 3
ESI mass spectra to investigate the origin of
the methyl protons. 13C- and 15N-depleted substrate
peptides were obtained
as described (see the Experimental Section). (a) Spectra showing the doubly charged ion for the hexazole-containing
core peptide substrate 1 (red) and the methylated product
obtained with CD3-SAM in H2O after 1 h (blue)
or 16 h (black) reactions. (b) Spectra showing substrate (red) and
product obtained with CD3-SAM in D2O (blue)
and CD3-5′,5′,4′,3′-D4-SAM in D2O (black) after 1 h. See Table S2 for calculated and observed masses.
ESI mass spectra to investigate the origin of
the methyl protons. 13C- and 15N-depleted substrate
peptides were obtained
as described (see the Experimental Section). (a) Spectra showing the doubly charged ion for the hexazole-containing
core peptide substrate 1 (red) and the methylated product
obtained with CD3-SAM in H2O after 1 h (blue)
or 16 h (black) reactions. (b) Spectra showing substrate (red) and
product obtained with CD3-SAM in D2O (blue)
and CD3-5′,5′,4′,3′-D4-SAM in D2O (black) after 1 h. See Table S2 for calculated and observed masses.Because of the solvent exchange observed at extended
reaction times,
all subsequent assays were performed for 1 h. We first investigated
whether the generation of the product containing a CHD2 group when using CD3-SAM in H2O involves the
incorporation of a proton from solvent. Thus, the reaction was performed
using CD3-SAM in D2O. Analysis of the product
by ESI-MS (Figure b) showed that the major product still contained CHD2,
although the relative amount of CD3 transfer increased.
This observation suggests that a hydrogen in an initially nonexchangeable
position migrates to the methyl group, possibly with the intermediacy
of a partially solvent exchangeable intermediate. The mechanisms in Figure provide three possible
sources for this hydrogen. First, the thiazole hydrogen on the β-carbon
of 1 that must be removed during the methylation process
could migrate via an active site base to the methyl group of the product
(pathway a). Alternatively, a hydrogen that originates
from the protein that does not exchange could be transferred to the
methyl group (pathway b). On the basis of literature
precedent, an example of the latter could be the α-hydrogens
of Gly.[43,44] Lastly, the hydrogen could originate from
the methyl group of 5′-dA (pathway c).
Isotope
Labeling Studies Involving the 5′-Position of
SAM and the Substrate Thiazole
We first considered 5′-dA
as the source for the additional hydrogen in the methyl group of the
product. Abstraction of a hydrogen atom from 5′-dA by radical 4 (pathway c, Figure ) would explain transfer of CHD2 when employing CD3-SAM. We therefore prepared SAM from
Met-CD3 and 5′,5′,4′,3′-D4-ATP (∼92% CD3-5′,5′,4′,3′-D4-SAM by ESI-MS, Figure S8). The
resulting CD3-5′,5′,4′,3′-D4-SAM was then reacted with TbtI and the TbtA hexazole 1 in D2O. The reaction products were analyzed by
ESI-TOF MS. The amount of product that contained CHD2 was
similar to that observed when the 5′ position of SAM was unlabeled
(Figure b). Hence,
the hydrogen in this product does not originate from the 5′
position of the adenosine, ruling out pathway c under
these conditions.We next considered pathway b to account for the product hydrogen, in which a nonexchangeable
hydrogen on the protein is transferred to the product methyl group
in the first turnover; this hydrogen would be replaced by a solvent-derived
hydrogen in subsequent turnovers. This behavior has previously been
observed, such as the transfer of Cα hydrogens from a Gly residue.[43,44] In principle, hydrogen transfer could also originate from other
amino acids or very tightly hydrogen bonded positions that would only
exchange upon reaction. Because TbtI contains several conserved Gly
residues (Figure S2), we reacted a 20-fold
excess of substrate 1 and CD3-SAM with TbtI
in buffered D2O and analyzed the product by ESI-MS (Figure S9). The major product again contained
a CHD2 group, arguing against a protein-derived hydrogen
that is transferred to the methyl group.Having provided evidence
against pathways b and c, we next
replaced the Cβ protium of the thiazole
with deuterium to interrogate pathway a (Figure ). We prepared TbtAhexazole using an E. coli strain that is auxotrophic
for Cys and provided β-D2-Cys to the 13C/15N-depleted minimal media. Unfortunately, the expression
level of the peptide under these conditions was very low. During optimization
of the expression conditions, we noted that improved production could
be achieved upon addition of a limited number of unlabeled amino acids
to the culture media (see the Experimental Section for details). Analysis by tandem ESI-MS confirmed the desired deuterium
labeling of the six Cys residues in the TbtA precursor (Figure S10). The resulting peptide (∼95%
D2 at Cys4 by ESI-MS-MS) was then converted to the corresponding
hexazole-containing core peptide 2in vitro as previously reported.[45] Owing to the
need to add additional amino acids (which were not 13C-
and 15N-depleted), the monoisotopic purity of the hexazole 2 was lower than that of the substrate 1. Nevertheless,
an ion consistent with the hexa-deuterated TbtA hexazole core peptide
was the major product observed by ESI-MS.With peptide 2 in hand, we conducted a series of single
turnover experiments. If the hydrogen in the transferred CHD2 was protein-derived in Figure b, then a single turnover experiment in D2O with substrate 2 and CD3-SAM should still
result in CHD2 transfer. However, when the experiment was
performed with a 3-fold excess of TbtI over substrate 2, CD3 transfer was observed as the major product (Figure a). This result provided
additional data against pathway b: a nonexchangeable
hydrogen from the enzyme was not the source of hydrogen in the methyl
group of the product. We tentatively propose that the small amount
of CHD2 transfer observed may originate in part because
of incomplete deuteration of the reagents. We then repeated the single
turnover experiment with CD3-SAM in D2O but
employed substrate 1. A considerable amount of CD3 transfer was observed, indicating that solvent exchange occurred
in the single turnover experiments with excess enzyme (Figure b), but importantly, the relative
amount of CD3 transfer declined considerably compared to
experiments conducted with substrate 2. Collectively,
these data provide strong support for pathway a being
operative during TbtI catalysis. These experiments also argue against
TbtI already containing a covalently bound methyl group introduced
during expression in E. coli; this methyl group would
have been unlabeled, and therefore, we would have observed a considerable
amount of product containing CH3 and CH2D.
Figure 4
A solvent
exchangeable proton migrates from the β-position
of thiazole 4 to the methyl group in the product. (a) Spectra showing
the doubly charged core peptide of the TbtA hexazole substrate 2 that is deuterated at the β-carbon of each thiazole
(red) and the corresponding product obtained with CD3-SAM
in D2O (blue) in a single turnover reaction. (b) Spectra
showing the doubly charged core peptide of the TbtA hexazole substrate 1 (red) and the corresponding product obtained with CD3-SAM in D2O (blue) in a TbtI-catalyzed single turnover
reaction. See Table S2 for calculated and
observed masses.
A solvent
exchangeable proton migrates from the β-position
of thiazole 4 to the methyl group in the product. (a) Spectra showing
the doubly charged core peptide of the TbtA hexazole substrate 2 that is deuterated at the β-carbon of each thiazole
(red) and the corresponding product obtained with CD3-SAM
in D2O (blue) in a single turnover reaction. (b) Spectra
showing the doubly charged core peptide of the TbtA hexazole substrate 1 (red) and the corresponding product obtained with CD3-SAM in D2O (blue) in a TbtI-catalyzed single turnover
reaction. See Table S2 for calculated and
observed masses.To identify residues
that may mediate the transfer process, we
substituted conserved residues Tyr8 and Glu105 of TbtI with Ala (Figure S2). The corresponding residues are near
the SAM-binding site in HemN,[46,47] a rSAM decarboxylase
from the heme biosynthetic pathway that is homologous to TbtI. Replacement
of either residue resulted in TbtI variants with severely decreased
activity (Figure S11). Two additional conserved
residues (Trp23 and Tyr200) were targeted for Ala substitution given
that they could participate in electron or hydrogen atom transfer;
however, the activity of the resulting TbtI variants was not decreased,
suggesting that they are not involved in catalysis (Figure S3C).
Discussion
A combination of product
analysis and isotope labeling studies
has allowed us to formulate a mechanism for TbtI that is consistent
with all of our available data. The observation of 5′-dA as
a product suggests that the TbtI-catalyzed reaction is initiated in
a manner similar to canonical rSAM proteins: electron transfer from
the reduced [4Fe–4S] cluster results in the reductive cleavage
of SAM1 to form methionine and 5′-dA• (Figure ).[42] We propose that the 5′-dA• then abstracts a hydrogen
atom from the methyl group of SAM2. This hypothesis is supported by
the observation that use of CD3-SAM resulted in the incorporation
of one deuterium into 5′-dA. This reaction appears irreversible,
since we never observed multiple deuteriums in 5′-dA (Figure S4). Use of two molecules of SAM is also
consistent with (i) the observed stoichiometry of 5′-dA and
SAH to the methylated product, (ii) the previously reported crystal
structure of HemN with two bound SAM molecules,[46,47] and (iii) recent results reported for the class CrSAM MT NosN.[35] Although HemN and TbtI catalyze different reactions
(decarboxylation and methylation, respectively), the use of two molecules
of SAM might be a general property of class CrSAM enzymes.Upon hydrogen atom abstraction from the methyl group of SAM2, we
propose that the resulting methylene radical adds to the electrophilic
C=C bond of the thiazole, generating resonance-stabilized radical 3 (Figure ). This may trigger deprotonation from the β-position by an
active site base B to eliminate SAH and form resonance-stabilized
radical 4 that partially restores thiazole aromaticity
(Figure ). This proton
is adjacent to an enoxyradical, and previous studies on 2-hydroxyglutaryl-CoA
dehydratase[48] have suggested that the pKa values of such protons are on the order of
∼14. One candidate residue for the active site base is Glu105,
which upon substitution with Ala severely decreases TbtI activity
(Figure S11). The equivalent Glu in HemN
(Glu145) is near the SAM-binding site;[46,47] thus, an alternative
role for Glu105 could be to bind SAM. Reduction of radical 4, possibly by the [4Fe–4S] cluster, would produce resonance-stabilized
anion 5, which can then be protonated by the conjugate
acid of the active site base, possibly Glu105. This pathway would
explain the observed deuterium transfer from the β position
of the thiazole to the methyl group in the product (Figure ).A variation of this
mechanism features abstraction by radical 4 of a hydrogen
atom from a redox active amino acid in the
active site (e.g., Tyr/Trp/Gly; Cys residues can be ruled out, since
their replacement with Ala had no effect on activity, Figure S3). The amino acid radical would then
be reduced and protonated to reset the enzyme for another turnover
(Figure , pathway b). The single turnover experiments argue against the possibility
that this hydrogen is in a nonexchangeable position in the first turnover
but becomes a solvent-derived hydrogen in subsequent turnovers. Hence,
the involvement of Gly radicals is unlikely, but other redox active
amino acids cannot yet be ruled out. For instance, a tyrosinate could
serve as the base that deprotonates radical 3 and the
resulting phenol moiety could then provide a hydrogen atom to radical 4. Tyr8 is conserved in the class CrSAM proteins (Figure S2). In HemN, the equivalent Tyr56 π-stacks
with the adenine of SAM2. Substitution of TbtITyr8 with Ala severely
decreased activity (Figure S11), and hence,
Tyr8 might be a hydrogen atom donor that generates the final product.
We ruled out the possibility, at least in vitro,
that the final hydrogen atom donoris 5′-dA by conducting experiments
with SAM that was deuterated at both the methyl group and the 5′
position (Figure ,
pathway c). Use of this deuterated SAM analogue did
not result in an increase in the deuterium content of the final product.
However, from an efficiency perspective, hydrogen atom abstraction
from 5′-dA would be attractive, as it would directly regenerate
the 5′-dA• and would not require the additional electron
required for pathways a and b. Furthermore,
as shown by the SAM-dependent solvent exchange of the methyl group
in the product, 5′-dA• may abstract a hydrogen atom
from the methyl group, which would be the microscopic reverse of the
last step of pathway c. Hence, while pathway c clearly is not consistent with our in vitro findings, perhaps under the right conditions pathway c might be operational in vivo.The proposed
mechanism accounts for the observed solvent exchange
upon prolonged reaction times by realization that the methylated peptide
product, SAM1, and SAH can likely still bind to the active site, since
these three molecules can occupy nearly identical positions as the
substrate peptide, SAM1, and SAM2 at the start of catalysis (the only
difference is that the methyl group of SAM2 is transferred to the
peptide). Reductive cleavage of SAM1 would generate 5′-dA•,
and the methyl group of the product peptide would be in a similar
position as the methyl group of SAM2 during productive turnover. Thus,
hydrogen atom abstraction could again generate radical 4 and either pathway a or b would
result in hydrogen transfer by an active site residue, thus affecting
the observed exchange (Figure S12a). Alternatively,
the exchange could occur by a heterolytic deprotonation/reprotonation
sequence that requires bound SAM (Figure S12b).In summary, our study suggests that methyl transfer catalyzed
by
TbtI involves two SAM molecules. Our data are consistent with a mechanism
in which one SAM is reductively cleaved to 5′-dA• as
in other rSAM enzymes. The 5′-dA• then abstracts a hydrogen
atom from a second SAM, and the resulting carbon-based methylene radical
attacks the thiazole at position 4 of the peptide substrate. This
SAM-derived radical is unprecedented in rSAM enzymology. We note that,
like the class A rSAM MTs and a recent report on the class C MT NosN,[35] TbtI formally transfers a methylene group from
SAM to the substrate and hence might not be considered a true methyl
transferase. Regardless, the manner by which this is accomplished
adds a fundamentally different use of SAM in this class of enzymes,
and highlights their versatility and catalytic diversity in natural
product biosynthesis. Additional biochemical and structural studies
on TbtI are underway to gain further insights into the mechanism of
this remarkable transformation.
Experimental
Section
General Methods
All polymerase chain reactions (PCRs)
were carried out on a C1000 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad). DNA sequencing
was performed by ACGT, Inc. MALDI-TOF MS was carried out on a Bruker
Daltonics UltrafleXtreme MALDI TOF/TOF instrument (Bruker). ESI-MS/MS
analyses were performed using a SYNAPT ESI quadrupole TOF Mass Spectrometry
System (Waters) equipped with an ACQUITY Ultra Performance Liquid
Chromatography (UPLC) system (Waters). HiTrap columns for Ni-NTA affinity
chromatography were purchased from GE Healthcare.
Materials
Reagents used for molecular biology experiments
were purchased from New England BioLabs (Ipswich, MA), Thermo Fisher
Scientific (Waltham, MA), or Gold Biotechnology Inc. (St. Louis, MO).
Other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Plasmid inserts were sequenced at ACGT Inc. (Wheeling, IL). Oligonucleotides
were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies Inc. (Coralville,
IA). Deuterium-labeled reagents were purchased from Cambridge Isotope
Laboratories.
Strains and Plasmids
E.
coli DH5α
and E. coliBL21 (DE3) cells were used as a host
for cloning and plasmid propagation and as a host for protein expression,
respectively. Coexpression vector pRSFDuet-1 was
obtained from Novagen. E. coli JW3582-2 that is auxotrophic
for cysteine was purchased from the Coli Genetic Stock Center at Yale
University, https://cgsc2.biology.yale.edu/Strain.php?ID=108920.
Construction of TbtI Variants
Site directed mutagenesis
(SDM) was performed using the QuikChange method (Agilent) as per the
manufacturer’s instructions using PfuTurbo DNA polymerase.
The primers for each mutant are listed in Table S1. The mutations were verified by sequencing using a custom
MBP forward primer or the T7 reverse primer (Table S1).
Expression, Purification, and Assays of TbtI
Expression,
purification, and in vitro reconstitution of the
[4Fe–4S] cluster of TbtI were carried out as previously described.[36] Briefly, the in vitro methylation
reaction mixtures generally included the following components: TbtAhexazole substrate (50–100 μM), purified TbtI from E. coli heterologous expression after in vitro reconstitution of the [4Fe–4S] cluster (10 μM), S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM, 1 mM), flavodoxin
(10 μM), flavodoxin reductase (10 μM), reduced nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH, 2 mM) in reaction buffer (50
mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5). The reaction was allowed to proceed for
1 h at 25 °C in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory).For reactions performed in D2O, all reagents that participate
in the reaction were first dissolved in D2O, lyophilized,
and redissolved in D2O followed by adjusting of the pD.
The buffer containing the proteins was exchanged with D2O storage buffer (50 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, pD 7.5) by repeated concentration
by ultrafiltration and dilution (four times) before addition into
the reaction. The reaction was allowed to proceed in D2O reaction buffer (50 mM Tris, pD 7.5) for 1 h at 25 °C in the
anaerobic chamber.For single turnover reactions, a reaction
mixture generally included
the following components: TbtA hexazole substrate (20 μM), purified
TbtI after in vitro reconstitution of the [4Fe–4S]
cluster (60 μM), S-adenosyl-l-methionine
(SAM, 1 mM), flavodoxin (30 μM), flavodoxin reductase (30 μM),
reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH, 2 mM)
in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5). The reaction was
allowed to proceed for 10 min at 25 °C in the anaerobic chamber.To determine the specific activity of the TbtI used, the enzyme
(10 μM) was incubated with the hexazole substrate peptide (100
μM), S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM,
1 mM), flavodoxin (20 μM), flavodoxin reductase (20 μM),
reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH, 2 mM)
in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5). Aliquots were
removed at set time points (30, 60, 90, and 120 s), and the reaction
was allowed to proceed at 25 °C in an anaerobic chamber. At 120
s, the conversion was 15%. Product formation over time was linear
with a velocity of 15.6 × 10–3 μmol/min/mg
of TbtI (i.e., 0.72 min–1). To ensure that under
these conditions the reaction catalyzed by TbtI was rate limiting,
the amounts of flavodoxin and flavodoxin reductase were doubled, and
no change in velocity was observed. Similarly, to ensure that all
substrates were saturating, the concentrations of SAM, NADPH, and
peptide were doubled without observing a change in velocity.
Generation
of 13C- and 15N-Depleted TbtA
Hexazole
Isotopically depleted TbtA hexazole was produced
in E. coli cultured in modified M9 minimal media.[49]E. coliBL21(DE3) cells containing
a pTrc99 plasmid encoding maltose binding protein
(MBP)-tagged TbtF, MBP-tagged TbtG, and TbtE and a pRSFDuet-1 plasmid encoding the His6-TbtA were grown overnight at
37 °C in lysogeny broth (LB) containing 25 μg/mL kanamycin
and 50 μg/mL ampicillin. After harvesting the cells, the supernatant
was discarded and the cells were washed with 5 mL of wash buffer (22
mM KH2PO4, 42 mM Na2HPO4, 8.5 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). Following washing, the cells were resuspended
in wash buffer and used to inoculate (1:100) the modified M9 minimal
media, with the following composition per 100 mL: 10 mL of a 10×
stock of minimal media (220 mM KH2PO4, 420 mM
Na2HPO4, 85 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), 0.3 mL of 40%
aqueous (14NH4)2SO4 (Sigma-Aldrich),
2 mL of 20% aqueous 13C-depleted glucose (Cambridge Isotope
Laboratories), 0.1 mg of FeSO4, 10 μg of thiamine,
200 μL of 1 M MgSO4, 10 μL of 1 M CaCl2, and 75 μL of a trace element solution (5 mM CaCl2, 1.25 mM ZnCl2, 260 μM CuCl2·H2O, 252 μM CoCl2·6H2O, 250
μM Na2MoO4·2H2O, pH 7.4).
The media also contained 50 μg/mL ampicillin and 25 μg/mL
kanamycin. The cells were grown at 37 °C and induced at OD600 = 0.6–0.8 by the addition of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG) to a final concentration of 0.5 mM and grown for an additional
16–18 h at 18 °C before harvesting. Purification of TbtAhexazole was carried out as previously described.[50]
Generation of TbtA Hexazole Deuterium Labeled
at Each Thiazole
MBP-tagged TbtA containing β-D2-Cys was generated
using E. coli strain JW3582-2. A lysogenization step
was performed to JW3582-2 before production of MBP-tagged TbtA so
that the host strain could be used to express target genes cloned
in T7 expression vectors. Lysogenization was performed using the λDE3
Lysogenization Kit (Novagen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions.
The lysogenized JW3582-2 was transformed with a pET28 plasmid containing the ampicillin resistance gene and encoding MBP-tagged
TbtA.Expression of MBP-tagged TbtA containing β-D2-cys was performed in modified M9 minimal media as described
above, except that amino acids were added into the culture (final
concentrations: 0.5 mM Arg, 1 mM His, 1 mM Leu, 1 mM Lys, 0.5 mM Met,
2 mM Pro, 3 mM Thr, 0.4 mM Trp, and 1 mM of β-D2-Cys).
Purification and in vitro cyclodehydration of the
β-D2-cysteine-labeled MBP-tagged TbtA were carried
out as previously described.[45]
Leader Peptide
Removal
Proteolytic removal of the leader
peptide to generate TbtA-hexazole core peptides for TbtI reactions
was carried out as previously described.[50]
Preparation of SAM
E. coli strain
DM22-(pK8), which overexpresses E. coliSAM synthetase,
was constructed by G. D. Markham et al. (Fox Chase Cancer Center,
Philadelphia, PA).[51] DM22-(pK8) was grown
in LB containing 30 μg/mL tetracycline at 37 °C while being
shaken and harvested by centrifugation 12 h after inoculation. The
cells (∼12 g) were resuspended in 36 mL of 0.1 M Tris–HCl
(pH 8.0) containing 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and
50 μg/mL lysozyme and gently stirred at room temperature for
30 min. Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) was added to a final
concentration of 1 mM, and cells were lysed with a MultiFlex C3 Homogenizer
(Avestin). The cell lysate was centrifuged for 30 min at 26,500 × g at 4 °C. The cleared lysate was dialyzed against
4 L of 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, in 2 × 30
mL 20,000 molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassettes
(Pierce) at 4 °C overnight, and was divided into three portions,
frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C.SAM was generated enzymatically by incubating an aliquot of the lysate
in a buffered solution (0.1 L) containing 0.1 M Tris–HCl (pH
8.0), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 20% acetonitrile, 26 mM MgCl2, 13 mM adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and 10 mM methionine. After
the mixture had been gently stirred for 5 h at room temperature, the
reaction was quenched by adjusting the pH to 5.0 with HCl. The mixture
was placed on ice for 15 min and centrifuged at 4000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C to remove precipitated material.
The supernatant was diluted to 1 L with 1 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0)
and loaded on a CM-52 cation exchange resin (Whatman) that had been
charged with 0.2 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0) and equilibrated in 1 mM
sodium acetate (pH 5.0). The column was rinsed with 1 L of 1 mM sodium
acetate (pH 5.0), and SAM was eluted with 0.5 L of 40 mM H2SO4. The presence of SAM was monitored by UV–vis
absorption at 260 nm, and fractions containing SAM were combined.
The solution was concentrated by rotovap to a volume of 4 mL, and
was divided into several fractions and stored at −80 °C.
Deuterium-labeled SAM was prepared using the same procedure but with
labeled methionine or ATP.
Radioactive Assay with 14CH3-SAM
The assay to determine whether the SAM methyl
group is transferred
onto TbtI was performed with 14CH3-SAM (0.02
mCi/mL, 300 μM). The in vitro reconstitution
of the [4Fe–4S] cluster of MBP-TbtI was performed as previously
described,[36] followed by addition of TbtAhexazole inside an anaerobic chamber. After incubation at room temperature
for 1 h, the reaction mixture was taken out of the anaerobic chamber
and moved into an anaerobic bag filled with nitrogen gas, and 1:1 14CH3-SAM/unlabeled CH3-SAM mixture was
then added into the reaction inside the anaerobic bag. The reaction
mixture included the following components: MBP-TbtI (10 μM),
TbtA hexazole (100 μM), 1:1 14CH3-SAM/unlabeled
CH3-SAM mixture (300 μM) in a final volume of 100
μL. The reaction was incubated at room temperature for 1 h,
and 30 μL of the reaction mixture was loaded on a 4–20%
polyacrylamide gel. Electrophoresis was performed for 45 min at 150
V (constant voltage), and then the gel was stained with Coomassie
blue staining solution (40% methanol, 10% acetic acid, 0.1% Coomassie
blue R250 in H2O) for 30 min and destained in destain buffer
(20% methanol, 10% acetic acid in H2O) for 3 h. After drying
the gel overnight with a gel-drying kit (Promega) in accordance with
the manufacturer’s procedure, the dried gel was exposed on
a phosphorimager cassette for 4 days. The film was finally visualized
with a STORM840 Phosphorimager Scanner (Amersham Biosciences). Whereas
the Coomassie stained gel clearly showed the presence of the protein,
no radioactivity was observed in the gel. A parallel experiment with
unlabeled SAM and including the reducing system demonstrated full
enzyme activity.
E.
coli BL21(DE3) cells were transformed with an intein based
expression vector pTYB1 plasmid encoding the CBD fused Flv/Flx.[52] Cells were grown for 24 h on LBagar plates
containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin at 37 °C. Single colonies
were picked to inoculate 10 mL of LB containing the same concentration
of antibiotic and grown at 37 °C for 16–18 h. This culture
was used to inoculate 1 L of LB supplemented with the same concentration
of antibiotic and grown to an OD600 of 0.6 before being
placed on ice for 15 min. Protein expression was then induced with
the addition of 0.5 mM IPTG and supplemented with flavin adenine mononucleotide
(FMN) for overexpression of Flv and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)
for overexpression of Flx to a final concentration of 10 μM,
respectively. Expression was allowed to proceed for 12 h at 18 °C.
Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 × g for 20 min, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl,
2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4), and harvested by centrifugation. The cells
were flash-frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C
for a maximum of 1 week before use.Cells were resuspended in
cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM
TCEP, and 0.1% Triton X-100 (v/v)) containing 4 mg/mL
lysozyme, 2 μM leupeptin, 2 μM benzamidine, and 2 μM
E-64. Cells were further lysed by sonication (3 × 45 s with 10
min agitation periods at 4 °C). Insoluble debris was removed
by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 40 min at
4 °C. The supernatant was then applied to a column containing
lysis-buffer pre-equilibrated chitin resin (NEB; 15 mL of resin/1
L of initial cell culture). The column was washed with 10–15
column volumes of wash buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 1 M NaCl,
1 mM TCEP, and either 10 μM FMN for Flv or 10 μM FAD for
Flx, respectively). The column was flushed quickly with 20–25
mL of cleavage buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 500 mM NaCl,
1 mM EDTA, 25 mM DTT), and the column was incubated at 4 °C for
20–24 h. The CBP fused proteins were eluted using elution buffer
(20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.5, 500 mM NaCl), and collected in 1 mL
fractions. The yellow colored fractions were pooled and concentrated
using a 30 kDa MWCO Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter (EMD Millipore).
A buffer exchange step was performed with protein storage buffer (50
mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) pH 7.5,
300 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP, and 5% glycerol (v/v)) prior
to final concentration, freezing in liquid nitrogen, and storage at
−80 °C.
UPLC MS and ESI-MS/MS
The sample
was prepared as described
previously.[45] LC-MS was performed using
a Waters SYNAPT mass spectrometer outfitted with an ACQUITY UPLC,
an ACQUITY Bridged Ethyl Hybrid C8 column (2.1 × 50 mm2, 1.7 μm particle size, 200 Å; Waters), an ESI ion source,
and a quadruple TOF detector. A gradient of 2–100% aq. MeCN
with 0.1% formic acid (v/v) over 20 min was used.
Fragmentation of the sample was performed using a collision-induced
dissociation (CID) method. A ramping of cone voltage of 15–18
kV during the scan was performed to generate peptide fragments for
MS/MS analysis.
Authors: Hak Joong Kim; Reid M McCarty; Yasushi Ogasawara; Yung-nan Liu; Steven O Mansoorabadi; Jake LeVieux; Hung-wen Liu Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Anthony J Blaszczyk; Alexey Silakov; Bo Zhang; Stephanie J Maiocco; Nicholas D Lanz; Wendy L Kelly; Sean J Elliott; Carsten Krebs; Squire J Booker Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Manuel Montalbán-López; Thomas A Scott; Sangeetha Ramesh; Imran R Rahman; Auke J van Heel; Jakob H Viel; Vahe Bandarian; Elke Dittmann; Olga Genilloud; Yuki Goto; María José Grande Burgos; Colin Hill; Seokhee Kim; Jesko Koehnke; John A Latham; A James Link; Beatriz Martínez; Satish K Nair; Yvain Nicolet; Sylvie Rebuffat; Hans-Georg Sahl; Dipti Sareen; Eric W Schmidt; Lutz Schmitt; Konstantin Severinov; Roderich D Süssmuth; Andrew W Truman; Huan Wang; Jing-Ke Weng; Gilles P van Wezel; Qi Zhang; Jin Zhong; Jörn Piel; Douglas A Mitchell; Oscar P Kuipers; Wilfred A van der Donk Journal: Nat Prod Rep Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 15.111