Genomic and metagenomic investigations have recently led to the delineation of a novel class of natural products called ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs). RiPPs are ubiquitous among living organisms and include pharmaceutically relevant compounds such as antibiotics and toxins. A prominent example is polytheonamide A, which exhibits numerous post-translational modifications, some of which were unknown in ribosomal peptides until recently. Among these post-translational modifications, C-methylations have been proposed to be catalyzed by two putative radical S-adenosylmethionine (rSAM) enzymes, PoyB and PoyC. Here we report the in vitro activity of PoyC, the first B12-dependent rSAM enzyme catalyzing peptide Cβ-methylation. We show that PoyC catalyzes the formation of S-adenosylhomocysteine and 5'-deoxyadenosine and the transfer of a methyl group to l-valine residue. In addition, we demonstrate for the first time that B12-rSAM enzymes have a tightly bound MeCbl cofactor that during catalysis transfers a methyl group originating from S-adenosyl-l-methionine. Collectively, our results shed new light on polytheonamide biosynthesis and the large and emerging family of B12-rSAM enzymes.
Genomic and metagenomic investigations have recently led to the delineation of a novel class of natural products called ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs). RiPPs are ubiquitous among living organisms and include pharmaceutically relevant compounds such as antibiotics and toxins. A prominent example is polytheonamide A, which exhibits numerous post-translational modifications, some of which were unknown in ribosomal peptides until recently. Among these post-translational modifications, C-methylations have been proposed to be catalyzed by two putative radical S-adenosylmethionine (rSAM) enzymes, PoyB and PoyC. Here we report the in vitro activity of PoyC, the first B12-dependent rSAM enzyme catalyzing peptide Cβ-methylation. We show that PoyC catalyzes the formation of S-adenosylhomocysteine and 5'-deoxyadenosine and the transfer of a methyl group to l-valine residue. In addition, we demonstrate for the first time that B12-rSAM enzymes have a tightly bound MeCbl cofactor that during catalysis transfers a methyl group originating from S-adenosyl-l-methionine. Collectively, our results shed new light on polytheonamide biosynthesis and the large and emerging family of B12-rSAM enzymes.
B12-dependent radical S-adenosylmethionine (B12-rSAM) enzymes[1,2] constitute one of the largest groups of enzymes within the rSAM
enzyme superfamily, which contains more than 140 000 members.[3,4] They have been identified in the biosynthetic pathways of many natural
products, including several families of ribosomally synthesized and
post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) such asthiostrepton,[1,2,5] polytheonamides,[6] and bottromycins.[7] B12-rSAM enzymes are also involved in the biosynthesis of a wide range
of antibiotics produced by Actinomycetes: carbapenem,[8] chondrochloren,[9] clorobiocin,[10] fortimicin,[11] fosfomycin,[12] gentamicin,[13] mitomycin,[14] moenomycin,[15] novobiocin,[16] pactamycin,[17] and l-phosphinothricin.[18] However, their
function often remains controversial, and the first in vitro studies have been reported only recently.[2,18]B12-rSAM enzymes have been proposed to catalyze chemically
challenging C- and P-methyl transfer reactions. Nevertheless, our
understanding of their functions and catalytic mechanisms remains
very limited. In an effort to gain insights into the unique chemistry
of these enzymes and the biosynthesis of polytheonamides, we undertook
a study of PoyB and PoyC, the two putative B12-rSAM enzymes
encoded in the poy operon (Figure a).[6]
Figure 1
(a) Biosynthetic
gene cluster of polytheonamide A. The two predicted
B12-rSAM enzymes PoyB and PoyC (in red) and the precursor
peptide PoyA (in blue) are indicated. (b) Sequence of PoyA showing
the core peptide. Residues in red indicate C-methylated residues,
while purple circles denote epimerized residues. (c) Structure of
polytheonamide A. d-Configured residues are shown in blue,
and methyl groups proposed to be inserted by PoyB and/or PoyC are
shown in red.
(a) Biosynthetic
gene cluster of polytheonamide A. The two predicted
B12-rSAM enzymes PoyB and PoyC (in red) and the precursor
peptide PoyA (in blue) are indicated. (b) Sequence of PoyA showing
the core peptide. Residues in red indicate C-methylated residues,
while purple circles denote epimerized residues. (c) Structure of
polytheonamide A. d-Configured residues are shown in blue,
and methyl groups proposed to be inserted by PoyB and/or PoyC are
shown in red.Polytheonamides are the
founding members of the so-called proteusins.
They have been shown to contain 48 post-translational modifications,
with 35 predicted to be catalyzed by three rSAM enzymes: PoyB, PoyC,
and PoyD (Figure b,c).
By an in vivo approach, it has been shown that PoyD
is a novel type of rSAM enzyme generating d-configured amino
acid residues.[6] Although no experimental
evidence was available, PoyB and PoyC were predicted to be responsible
for the 13 Cβ-methylations and the formation of the
unique N-terminal tert-butyl group (Figure c). Interestingly, recent characterization
of the bottromycin biosynthetic cluster led to the identification
of three B12-rSAM enzymes predicted to catalyze similar
Cβ-methyl transfer reactions.[7] Strikingly, in both operons the B12-rSAM enzymes do not
contain the canonical rSAM motif but rather a Cx7Cx2C motif.Our first attempts to express PoyB and PoyC in Escherichia
coli proved to be largely unsuccessful, as reported
for the majority of the B12-rSAM enzymes to date. Indeed,
most B12-rSAM enzymes, including the P-methylase PhpK[18] and the C-methylases Fom3[19] and GenK,[13] had to be artificially
refolded in the presence of cobalamin, sulfide, and iron. To isolate
PoyB and PoyC, we adapted our expression conditions using the ethanolamine-M9
medium recently described for the expression of two B12-rSAM enzymes, TsrM[20] and ThnK.[8] Under these conditions, PoyB remained insoluble
whereas PoyC was purified in a satisfactory yield (Figure a). The UV–vis spectrum
of the aerobically purified enzyme exhibited a maximum absorption
at ∼260/270 nm and two small shoulders at ∼420 and ∼464
nm (Figure b,c). The
shoulder at 420 nm indicated the presence of an iron–sulfur
center, while the latter was diagnostic of base-off alkylcobalamins.[21,22]
Figure 2
(a)
Gel electrophoresis analysis of PoyC (SDS PAGE 12%). (b) UV–vis
spectrum of as-isolated PoyC. (c) UV–vis spectra of PoyC before
(dashed line) and after (solid line) iron–sulfur reconstitution.
(d) Sequence of the PoyA1–15 peptide used as the
substrate. (e) HPLC analysis of PoyC reactions after incubation under
anaerobic conditions with SAM (2 mM), DTT (6 mM), and PoyA1–15 (1 mM) in the presence of various reductants, including sodium dithionite
(DT), flavodoxin/flavodoxin reductase/NADPH (Fldx/FPR), methyl viologen/NADPH
(MV), titanium citrate (Ti), or in the absence of reductant (CTL)
(UV detection at 257 nm). See the Supporting Information (SI) for the experimental conditions. (f) MS analyses of SAH (upper
trace) and 5′-dA (lower trace) produced by PoyC. (g) Correlation
between SAH and 5′-dA produced by PoyC. Analyses were performed
between 0 and 20 min as described in the SI.
(a)
Gel electrophoresis analysis of PoyC (SDS PAGE 12%). (b) UV–vis
spectrum of as-isolated PoyC. (c) UV–vis spectra of PoyC before
(dashed line) and after (solid line) iron–sulfur reconstitution.
(d) Sequence of the PoyA1–15 peptide used as the
substrate. (e) HPLC analysis of PoyC reactions after incubation under
anaerobic conditions with SAM (2 mM), DTT (6 mM), and PoyA1–15 (1 mM) in the presence of various reductants, including sodium dithionite
(DT), flavodoxin/flavodoxin reductase/NADPH (Fldx/FPR), methyl viologen/NADPH
(MV), titanium citrate (Ti), or in the absence of reductant (CTL)
(UV detection at 257 nm). See the Supporting Information (SI) for the experimental conditions. (f) MS analyses of SAH (upper
trace) and 5′-dA (lower trace) produced by PoyC. (g) Correlation
between SAH and 5′-dA produced by PoyC. Analyses were performed
between 0 and 20 min as described in the SI.After anaerobic iron–sulfur
reconstitution, the maximum
absorption shifted to ∼280 nm and the absorption band at ∼420
nm increased (Figure c). Iron–sulfur determination indicated that PoyC contained
11.8 ± 0.3 mol of iron and 13.6 ± 0.8 mol of sulfide per
polypeptide chain, supporting the presence of one to three [4Fe–4S]
centers. Sequence alignment between PoyB and PoyC indicated the presence
of 11 conserved cysteine residues (Supplementary Figure 1), which is compatible with the presence of an additional
[4Fe–4S] center, although, as reported for ThnK[8] and Fom3,[19] excess iron and
sulfide could not be ruled out.Because PoyC is predicted to
possess a RiPP precursor peptide recognition
element,[23] PoyA was the most suitable substrate.
However, it has been shown that PoyA is not accessible by heterologous
expression,[6] hampering our understanding
of polytheonamide biosynthesis. As shown in Figure c, most of the Cβ-methylated
residues are located in the N-terminus region of polytheonamide A.
We thus synthesized, as putative substrates, several peptides with
a sequence corresponding to the first amino acid residues found in
polytheonamide A. However, because of the intrinsic hydrophobic nature
of these peptides (containing mainly valine and alanine residues),
we obtained only low amounts of peptides, which were largely insoluble.
To improve their solubility, we added a polylysine stretch upstream
of the polytheonamide sequence. With this strategy, we obtained a
synthetic peptide (PoyA1–15) that proved to be compatible
with aqueous conditions and amenable to analysis by mass spectrometry
(MS) (Figure d).In order to preserve the cobalamin cofactor(s) present in PoyC,
we incubated the anaerobically reconstituted enzyme in the dark in
the presence of S-adenosyl-l-methionine
(SAM), dithiothreitol (DTT), and various reducing systems. The reducing
systems assayed were NADPH/flavodoxin/flavodoxin reductase (Fldx/FPR),
sodium dithionite (DT), and methyl viologen/NADPH (MV) (Figure e). To date, MV has been reported
to be the most efficient reducing system, successfully used with GenK[13] and ThnK.[8] Fldx/FPR
proved to sustain activity but only at low levels for GenK. DT has
been used with most of the B12-rSAM enzymes investigated
to date,[8,13,18,19,24] but it leads to poor
activities, in line with its well-known deleterious effects on cobalamins
and cobalamin-dependent enzymes.[25] With
PoyC, none of these reductants worked, as shown by the absence of
the expected products, 5′-deoxyadenosine (5′-dA) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) (Figure e).We then tried Ti(III) citrate (Ti),
which has been used as a reducing
agent for B12-dependent methionine synthase.[26] In the presence of Ti, we monitored the formation
of two products derived from SAM (Figure e), which were identified asSAH and 5′-dA,
as demonstrated by their retention times, UV–vis spectra, and
molecular weights of 385.1 and 252.1 Da, respectively (Figure f). Increasing the concentration
of Ti led to an increase in the enzyme activity, further demonstrating
the dependence of the reaction on an external electron donor. Kinetic
analysis revealed a strict correlation between SAH production and
5′-dA production (Figure g) with kcat ∼9
min–1. A similar correlation between SAH and 5′-dA
has been reported for GenK, which exhibited a lower in vitro activity with an estimated kcat of ∼48
min–1.High-resolution LC–MS analysis
showed that the PoyA1–15 peptide ([M + 2H]2+ = 962.129) was converted
into a new peptide, PoyA1–15* ([M + 2H]2+ = 970.646), only in the presence of PoyC, methyl-deuterated SAM
(CD3-SAM), and Ti (Figure a,b). This new peptide had a mass increment of 17.034
Da, which perfectly matched the replacement of one H atom by a CD3 group (theoretical mass shift [M + H]+ = 17.034).
This result demonstrated that PoyC catalyzes a methyl transfer reaction
from CD3-SAM to the PoyA1–15 peptide.
Under our assay conditions, ∼6% methylated peptide was produced,
hampering reliable kinetic analysis. However, as recently reported
for ThnK,[8] the presence of the substrate
was not required for PoyC to catalyze the reductive cleavage of SAM.
Figure 3
(a) LC–MS
analysis of PoyA1–15 incubated
with PoyC and CD3-SAM under anaerobic conditions in the
presence (+Ti) or absence (−Ti) of titanium citrate. See the SI for the experimental conditions. (b) High-resolution
LC–MS analyses of PoyA1–15 (upper trace)
and PoyA1–15* (lower trace). (c, d) High-resolution
LC–MS/MS analyses of (c) PoyA1–15 and (d)
PoyA1–15*. See Supplementary Figure 2 for the full spectra.
(a) LC–MS
analysis of PoyA1–15 incubated
with PoyC and CD3-SAM under anaerobic conditions in the
presence (+Ti) or absence (−Ti) of titanium citrate. See the SI for the experimental conditions. (b) High-resolution
LC–MS analyses of PoyA1–15 (upper trace)
and PoyA1–15* (lower trace). (c, d) High-resolution
LC–MS/MS analyses of (c) PoyA1–15 and (d)
PoyA1–15*. See Supplementary Figure 2 for the full spectra.LC–MS/MS analysis of the modified PoyA1–15* peptide revealed the positioning of the methyl group on the penultimate
amino acid, l-Val14 (Figure c,d, Supplementary Figure 2, and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Interestingly, Val14 is one of the few C-methylated and epimerized residues found
in native polytheonamide A (Figure b). Previous studies have shown that in vivo, heterologous coexpression of PoyA with PoyD[6] leads to epimerization of amino acid residues, suggesting that epimerization
is the first step in polytheonamide A biosynthesis. However, since E. coli is unable to produce de novo cobalamin, coexpressions of PoyA with PoyB or PoyC were inconclusive.
To test whether PoyC acts prior to or after epimerization, we synthesized
a peptide containing one d-Val at position 14 (PoyA1–15VD). As shown, introduction of one d-Val led
to methyl transfer inhibition (Figure a). This result further supports the hypothesis that
PoyC catalyzes methyl transfer only on l-amino acids. Consistent
with this hypothesis, most of the C-methylated residues are l-configured in polytheonamide A (Figure b).
Figure 4
(a) LC–MS analyses of PoyA1–15 (upper
trace) and PoyA1–15VD (lower trace) after
incubation in the presence of PoyC. See the SI for the experimental conditions. (b) SAM cleavage assay performed
with the PoyC Ax7Ax2A mutant (UV detection at 257 nm). Samples were
assayed at T = 0 min (upper trace) and after 180
min of incubation with the mutant enzyme (lower trace). See the SI for the experimental conditions. (c) HPLC
analysis of the cobalamin derivatives present in PoyC (WT) and the
Ax7Ax2A mutant (A3) (UV detection at 278 nm). (d) LC–MS analyses
of MeCbl present in PoyC at T = 0 h (upper trace)
and after 1 h of incubation with its peptide substrate, Ti (10 mM)
and CD3-SAM (2 mM) (lower trace).
(a) LC–MS analyses of PoyA1–15 (upper
trace) and PoyA1–15VD (lower trace) after
incubation in the presence of PoyC. See the SI for the experimental conditions. (b) SAM cleavage assay performed
with the PoyC Ax7Ax2A mutant (UV detection at 257 nm). Samples were
assayed at T = 0 min (upper trace) and after 180
min of incubation with the mutant enzyme (lower trace). See the SI for the experimental conditions. (c) HPLC
analysis of the cobalamin derivatives present in PoyC (WT) and the
Ax7Ax2A mutant (A3) (UV detection at 278 nm). (d) LC–MS analyses
of MeCbl present in PoyC at T = 0 h (upper trace)
and after 1 h of incubation with its peptide substrate, Ti (10 mM)
and CD3-SAM (2 mM) (lower trace).PoyC possesses a predicted unusual rSAM motif: Cx7Cx2C. To
probe
its function, we generated the corresponding triple variant Ax7Ax2A
(Supplementary Figure 3). As expected,
this mutant was unable to produce 5′-dA and to transfer a methyl
group to the substrate (Figure b). However, contrary to TsrM,[1,2] this mutant
was also impaired for SAH production, suggesting different functions
for the [4Fe–4S] center in these two B12-rSAM enzymes.Because PoyC is the first B12-rSAM enzyme isolated natively
loaded with a B12 cofactor (i.e., without addition of cobalamin
derivatives during enzyme refolding, purification or reaction), we
aimed to characterize its B12 content. PoyC, carefully
handled in the dark, was found to contain essentially two B12 derivatives identified asAdoCbl and MeCbl by their HPLC profiles
(Figure c and Supplementary Figure 4), their UV–vis
spectra and MS analyses (Supplementary Figure 5). PoyC proved to contain 0.27 ± 0.08 mol of MeCbl and
0.07 ± 0.02 mol of AdoCbl per polypeptide chain.The apparent
nonselectivity of PoyC for the upper axial ligand
of cobalamin was surprising since the methionine synthase from E. coli was purified as a mixture of forms containing
hydroxo- or methylcobalamin[27] while the
“corrinoid iron–sulfur protein” was isolated
as a cob(II)alamin complex.[28,29] It is well-known that
when supplied with cobalamin derivatives, E. coli produces large amounts of AdoCbl,[30] which
was likely incorporated during the heterologous expression of PoyC.
Interestingly, the Ax7Ax2A mutant also contained AdoCbl, but we did
not detect MeCbl (Figure c). This result suggests a critical role of the [4Fe–4S]
center in cobalamin methylation. It is also consistent with the fact
that the Ax7Ax2A mutant is unable to produce SAH and thus to transfer
the methyl group from SAM to cobalamin.As shown, the AdoCbl/MeCbl
content of the enzyme did not change
during the reaction (Supplementary Figure 6). However, MeCbl was almost entirely converted into CD3-Cbl during the reaction (Figure d), establishing that the enzyme-bound cobalamin is
recycled from SAM during catalysis.Collectively, our results
demonstrate that PoyC is a B12-rSAM enzyme with an unusual
Cx7Cx2C radical SAM motif identified
only in a putative rSAM enzyme[31] and the
predicted bottromycin methyltransferases.[7] We purified PoyC with two bound alkylcobalamins: AdoCbl and MeCbl.
On the basis of the UV–vis spectrum, it appears that these
cobalamins have a base-off coordination, similar to what has recently
been proposed for TsrM.[20] Using Tias the
reducing system, we have also demonstrated that PoyC is a peptide
C-methyltransferase catalyzing the reductive cleavage of SAM. Ti has
been extensively used for the reactivation of methionine synthase[26] and recently with a B12-dependent
P-methyltransferase.[24] However, in this
latter case, no 5′-dA or SAH was reported.In agreement
with our results, it is reasonable to assume that
PoyC catalyzes the reductive cleavage of SAM into the 5′-dA
radical. This radical species likely abstracts a Cβ-H atom,[32] generating
a carbon-centered radical intermediate. Currently, how the methyl
group is attached and what are the physiological oxidation states
of cobalamin remain open questions. The homolytic cleavage of MeCbl
and the formation of a methyl radical intermediate, as elegantly reported
in methyl-coenzyme M reductase,[33] would
provide a reasonable solution to attach the methyl group to the carbon-centered
radical. Cob(II)alamin, after reduction to cob(I)alamin, could react
with SAM to regenerate MeCbl. We have previously shown that TsrM catalyzes
methyl transfer to sp carbon atoms[2] and rigorously demonstrated that TsrM, contrary
to PoyC, does not catalyze the reductive cleavage of SAM or abstracts
a substrate H atom.[1,2] It thus appears that, depending
on the hybridization of the carbon atom (sp vs sp), B12-rSAM enzymes
have evolved different mechanisms requiring or not requiring the formation
of 5′-dA radical.Finally, our data show that PoyC catalyzes
methyl transfer only
on l-amino acid residues. This result indicates that methylation
occurs prior epimerization and suggests that PoyB is likely responsible
for the synthesis of the N-terminal tert-butyl group
in polytheonamide A, although other roles cannot be ruled out yet.
Authors: Hak Joong Kim; Reid M McCarty; Yasushi Ogasawara; Yung-nan Liu; Steven O Mansoorabadi; Jake LeVieux; Hung-wen Liu Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Anthony J Blaszczyk; Alexey Silakov; Bo Zhang; Stephanie J Maiocco; Nicholas D Lanz; Wendy L Kelly; Sean J Elliott; Carsten Krebs; Squire J Booker Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yan Kung; Nozomi Ando; Tzanko I Doukov; Leah C Blasiak; Güneş Bender; Javier Seravalli; Stephen W Ragsdale; Catherine L Drennan Journal: Nature Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Richard Ayikpoe; Thacien Ngendahimana; Michelle Langton; Sheila Bonitatibus; Lindsey M Walker; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton; Maria-Eirini Pandelia; Sean J Elliott; John A Latham Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Meredith A Skiba; Andrew P Sikkema; Nathan A Moss; Andrew N Lowell; Min Su; Rebecca M Sturgis; Lena Gerwick; William H Gerwick; David H Sherman; Janet L Smith Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Nicholas D Lanz; Anthony J Blaszczyk; Erin L McCarthy; Bo Wang; Roy X Wang; Brianne S Jones; Squire J Booker Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 3.162