PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility and agreement of measurement values obtained from the Tomey CASIA2 and Heidelberg Spectralis OCT2 anterior segment optical coherence tomographic devices. METHODS: Twenty eyes from 10 subjects ranging from age 28 to 45 years with no history of eye conditions or intraocular surgery were included. Two scans were obtained with each device in a standardized dark room environment after a period of dark adaptation. One anterior segment optical coherence tomography image along the horizontal (temporal nasal) meridian was analyzed per eye and per scan. Lens vault, pupil diameter, anterior chamber width, angle opening distance, trabecular iris space area, and scleral spur angle were measured using manufacturer-provided image analysis programs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values, coefficients of variation, and Bland-Altman plots were computed to assess the intradevice correlation and interdevice agreement of measurement values. RESULTS: There was excellent intradevice reproducibility of measurement values for both the CASIA (ICC range, 0.86 to 0.99) and Spectralis (ICC range, 0.79 to 1.00). There was also excellent interdevice correlation of measurement values (ICC range, 0.78 to 0.93) for all parameters except anterior chamber width (ICC 0.20). Linear regression models and Bland-Altman plots showed that this relationship was strongest when measurement values were small. CONCLUSIONS: There is excellent intradevice reproducibility and good interdevice agreement of anterior segment parameter measurement values for the CASIA2 and Spectralis OCT2. However, the measurements obtained with each device should not be considered interchangeable.
PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility and agreement of measurement values obtained from the Tomey CASIA2 and Heidelberg Spectralis OCT2 anterior segment optical coherence tomographic devices. METHODS: Twenty eyes from 10 subjects ranging from age 28 to 45 years with no history of eye conditions or intraocular surgery were included. Two scans were obtained with each device in a standardized dark room environment after a period of dark adaptation. One anterior segment optical coherence tomography image along the horizontal (temporal nasal) meridian was analyzed per eye and per scan. Lens vault, pupil diameter, anterior chamber width, angle opening distance, trabecular iris space area, and scleral spur angle were measured using manufacturer-provided image analysis programs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values, coefficients of variation, and Bland-Altman plots were computed to assess the intradevice correlation and interdevice agreement of measurement values. RESULTS: There was excellent intradevice reproducibility of measurement values for both the CASIA (ICC range, 0.86 to 0.99) and Spectralis (ICC range, 0.79 to 1.00). There was also excellent interdevice correlation of measurement values (ICC range, 0.78 to 0.93) for all parameters except anterior chamber width (ICC 0.20). Linear regression models and Bland-Altman plots showed that this relationship was strongest when measurement values were small. CONCLUSIONS: There is excellent intradevice reproducibility and good interdevice agreement of anterior segment parameter measurement values for the CASIA2 and Spectralis OCT2. However, the measurements obtained with each device should not be considered interchangeable.
Authors: Shu Liu; Marco Yu; Cong Ye; Dennis S C Lam; Christopher Kai-Shun Leung Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Lauren S Blieden; Alice Z Chuang; Laura A Baker; Nicholas P Bell; Timothy S Fuller; Kimberly A Mankiewicz; Robert M Feldman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Larry Kagemann; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Richard A Bilonick; Peter M Brennen; Lindsey S Folio; Michelle L Gabriele; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mingguang He; David S Friedman; Paul J Foster; Yuzhen Jiang; Dolly S Chang; Haogang Zhu; Anthony P Khawaja; Tin Aung; Shengsong Huang; Qianyun Chen; Beatriz Munoz; Carlota M Grossi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ricardo J Cumba; Sunita Radhakrishnan; Nicholas P Bell; Kundandeep S Nagi; Alice Z Chuang; Shan C Lin; Kimberly A Mankiewicz; Robert M Feldman Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Frank Brodie; Michael Repka; Stephen Allan Burns; S Grace Prakalapakorn; Christie Morse; Joel S Schuman; Michael R Duenas; Natalie Afshari; John S Pollack; Jennifer E Thorne; Albert Vitale; H Nida Sen; David Myung; Mark S Blumenkranz; Elmer Tu; Daniel X Hammer; Michelle Tarver; Bradley Cunningham; Larry Kagemann; SriniVas Sadda; David Sarraf; Glenn J Jaffe; Malvina Eydelman Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Sunee Chansangpetch; Anwell Nguyen; Marta Mora; Mai Badr; Mingguang He; Travis C Porco; Shan C Lin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Benjamin Y Xu; Anmol A Pardeshi; Bruce Burkemper; Grace M Richter; Shan C Lin; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Benjamin Y Xu; Anmol A Pardeshi; Bruce Burkemper; Grace M Richter; Shan C Lin; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Tong Zhao; Mengya Zhao; Qinghong Xie; Christopher W Fong; Jeremy Chen; Yingna Liu; Hui Feng; Shuning Li; Benjamin F Arnold; Tin Aung; Mingguang He; Julius T Oatts; Ying Han Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Benjamin Y Xu; Michael Chiang; Anmol A Pardeshi; Sasan Moghimi; Rohit Varma Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 3.283