Literature DB >> 28925398

Functional significance and therapeutic implication of ring-type E3 ligases in colorectal cancer.

L Liu1, C C Wong1, B Gong2, J Yu1.   

Abstract

Accumulative studies revealed that E3 ubiquitin ligases have important roles in colorectal carcinogenesis. The pathogenic mechanisms of colorectal cancer (CRC) initiation and progression are complex and heterogeneous, involving somatic mutations, abnormal gene fusion, deletion or amplification and epigenetic alteration, which may cause aberrant expression or altered function of E3 ligases in CRC. Defects of E3 ligases have been reported to be involved in the molecular etiology and pathogenesis of CRC. The aberrant expressed E3 ligases can function as either oncogenes or tumor suppressors depending on ubiquiting target substrates in CRC. Recently, considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the potential roles of E3 ligase-mediated ubiquitylation in colorectal carcinogenesis. There are mainly two subtypes of E3 ubiquitin ligases in humans, as defined by the presence of either a HECT domain or a RING finger domain on the basis of structural similitude. Most cancer-associated E3 ligases participate in regulating the cell cycle, apoptosis, gene transcription, cell signaling and DNA repair, the critical parts of CRC tumorigenesis. In this review, we have provided a comprehensive summary of abnormally expressed E3 ligases and their related pivotal mechanistic effects in CRC. In particular, we have highlighted the function of RING-type E3 ubiquitin enzymes in modulating cancer signaling pathways, immunity and tumor microenvironment in CRC development and progression; their mechanism(s) of action in CRC involving both ubiquitylation-dependent and ubiquitylation-independent effects; and the potential of RING E3 ligases as molecular biomarkers for predicting patient prognosis and as therapeutic targets in CRC. A better understanding of E3 ligase-mediated substrates' ubiquitylation involved in the development of CRC will provide new insights into the pathophysiology mechanisms of CRC, and unravel novel prognostic markers and therapeutic strategies for CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28925398      PMCID: PMC5770599          DOI: 10.1038/onc.2017.313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and a major cause of cancer-related deaths in the world.[1] Pathogenetic mechanisms of CRC initiation and progression are complex and heterogeneous, involving somatic gene mutations, abnormal gene fusion, gene copy number variations and epigenetic changes.[2, 3, 4] The ubiquitin–proteasome system has a vital role in regulating and maintaining cellular homeostasis, including cell survival, cell differentiation, and innate and acquired immunity.[5, 6, 7] Recently, considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the potential roles of E3 ligase-mediated ubiquitylation in colorectal carcinogenesis.[8] There are mainly two subtypes of E3 ubiquitin ligases in humans, defined as containing either a HECT domain or a RING finger domain on the basis of structural similitude.[9] Of these, the majority are RING finger and RING finger-related E3 ubiquitin ligases (Figure 1).
Figure 1

The ubiquitin–proteasome system and the structures of RING-type E3 ligases. RING-type E3 ligases are classified into monomeric RING ligases (a), dimeric RING ligases (b) and multisubunit RING ligases, which includes SCF (c) and anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) type ubiquitin ligases (d). Ubiquitylation of proteins is achieved through an enzymatic cascade involving ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) and ubiquitin-ligating enzyme (E3). E3 enzymes provide platforms for binding E2 enzymes and specific substrates, thereby coordinating ubiquitylation of the selected substrate (a, b). Substrates of SCF and APC/C ubiquitin ligases must be modified by phosphorylation before they can bind to E3 and be subjected to ubiquitination (c, d).

In humans, over 600 RING-based ubiquitin ligases have been described and they comprised one of the biggest family of enzymes.[10] These RING E3 ubiquitin ligases have been connected to the regulation of important cellular biological processes and their deregulation have been described to contribute to the pathogenesis of multiple human diseases, including malignancy.[11, 12, 13, 14, 15] Both tumor-suppressive and tumor-promotive pathways are regulated by RING E3 ligase-mediated ubiquitination, and could directly suppress or exacerbate carcinogenesis. As a consequence, RING E3 ligases might function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors depending on the nature of their target substrates.[16] Even a single Ring E3 ligase could have opposing functions in malignancy depending on context or the type of cancer involved.[17] Many studies have described the important roles played by different types of RING finger E3 ligases in the development of CRC, including Ring Finger Proteins (RNFs), the murine double minute 2/4 (MDM2/MDMX), Tripartite motifs (TRIMs), the inhibitor of apoptotic proteins (IAPs), the S phase kinase-associated protein 1 (SKP1)–cullin1–F-box protein (SCF) E3 ligase and anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-type E3 ligase.[18] RING-type E3 ligases have been discovered to target signaling molecules in p53 and Wnt/β-catenin pathways to modulate their activation in CRC.[19, 20] Moreover, deregulation of RING finger E3 ligases involved in maintenance of genomic integrity and cellular homeostasis also contributes to tumorigenesis.[10, 21] In this review, we highlight (1) the function of RING E3 ubiquitin ligases in modulating cancer growth and the tumor microenvironment in CRC development and progression; (2) their underlying mechanism(s) of action in CRC involving both ubiquitylation-dependent and ubiquitylation-independent effects; and (3) the potential of RING E3 ligases as molecular biomarkers for predicting patient prognosis and as therapeutic targets in CRC (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1

RING-type E3 ligases in human colorectal cancer

GeneExpressionPathwayProtein partnerBiomarkerRefs
RNF4UpregulationWnt and Notch signaling pathwaysβ-catenin, c-Myc, c-Jun and NICD/[31, 32]
RNF14UpregulationWnt/β-catenin signaling pathwayTCF4/[39, 40]
RNF43/ZNRF3Downregulation/mutationWnt/β-catenin signaling pathwayFzd1/2/3/4/5/8 and LRP5/6Prognosis[42, 43]
RNF20/40DownregulationNF-κB signaling pathwayH2Bub1/[46]
RNF85/TARF6UpregulationNF-κB signaling pathwayNF-κB kinase (IKK)/[49, 51]
TRIM3/p53 signaling pathway//[53]
TRIM15DownregulationActin cytoskeleton dynamicsFilamin-binding LIM protein 1 and VASP/[54]
TRIM40UpregulationInhibits NF-κB signalingIKK-γ/[55]
MDM2Upregulationp53 signaling pathwayp53/[19, 58, 59]
c-IAPUpregulationTNF and NF-κB signaling pathwaysRIP1, TRAF2 and NIKPrognosis[64, 65, 66]
XIAPUpregulationTNF and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathwaysCaspase-3, TLE/[69, 70, 71]
β-TRCP (SCF)UpregulationWnt/β-catenin and NF-κB signaling pathwaysβ-catenin, IkB, p53, Yap, IKB, KRAS, Cyclin D1, WEE1, CDC25, MCL-1 and pro-caspase-3, Snail, FOXO3 and CHD1Prognosis[75, 76, 77, 86, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99]
FBW7 (SCF)Mutation or lossJNK and Notch signaling pathwaysMYC, Cyclin E, Notch, JUN, Aurora kinase A and Mcl-1Prognosis[101, 102, 103, 104, 107, 135, 136]
SKP2 (SCF)Amplification/upregulationCell cycle progressionp27kip1 and p21Prognosis[113, 115, 116]
CDC20 (APC)UpregulationWnt/β-catenin signaling pathwayAxin2Prognosis[118, 119, 120]
CDH1 (APC)Mutation or lossCell cycleSKP2, Cyclin B, Aurora A, Aurora B, Tpx2, Cdc6 and Cdc20Prognosis[74, 122, 123, 124]
TRIM29Upregulation//Diagnosis[126, 127]
SurvivinUpregulationAnti-apoptotic pathways/Diagnosis[128, 129]
Table 2

Approaches to target E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in CRC

CompoundClassTargetProposed working mechanismRefs
R-spondinProtein/peptideRNF43/ZNRF3Neutralizes receptors and upregulates Wnt signaling[41]
C59porcupine inhibitorMutant RNF43/ZNRF3Blocks Wnt niche function[131, 132]
LGK974Small molecule Porcupine inhibitorRNF43/ZNRF3Prevents palmitylation of Wnt proteins and inhibits Wnt signaling[131, 132]
HLI98Small moleculeMDM2Inhibits MDM2 ubiquitin, activates p53 pathway and induces apoptosis[141]
MX69Small moleculeMDM2/XIAPDegrades MDM2, activates p53 and inhibits XIAP[142]
Ceramide/LCL85Small moleculecIAP1/XIAPInduces proteasomal degradation of cIAP1 and XIAP[143]
MLN4924Small moleculeSCF E3 ubiquitin ligasesInduces G2/M arrest, apoptosis and DNA damage; inhibition of cullin neddylation[146, 147]
CC0651Small moleculeE2 enzyme hCdc34 and SCF subunits Skp1, Cul1 and Rbx1Causes the SCFSkp2 substrate p27Kip1 accumulation[149, 150]
Pro-TAMESmall moleculeAPC/Cdc20Disruption of the APC/Cdc20 interaction leading to lower APC/C activity on substrates[151, 152, 153]

Abbreviations: APC/C, anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome; CRC, colorectal cancer; SCF, S phase kinase-associated protein 1–cullin1–F-box protein; XIAP, X-chromosome-linked apoptotic protein.

General features and functions of the ring-type E3 ligases

RING-type E3 ligases are a large family of enzymes that participate in regulating of the stability and activity of numerous interaction substrates. Ubiquitylation of proteins is achieved through an enzymatic cascade that involves ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) and ubiquitin-ligating enzyme (E3).[22] Ubiquitylation generates when an E3 ligase enzyme binds with both the target substrate and an E2 enzyme, and then E3 ligase catalyzes the transfer of ubiquitin from E2 enzyme to the lysine residue on its target protein, leading to monoubiquitylation or polyubiquitylation (Figure 1).[5, 10, 23] RING finger E3 ligases recognize their substrates via diverse protein–protein interactions that are dependent on different post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, sumoylation and glycosylation.[17, 24, 25] Although the binding sites for E3 ligases on target substrates are highly specific for ubiquitylation, a single protein may be targeted by various E3 ligases and each E3 ligase has multiple substrates, including themselves. The proteins tagged by polyubiquitylation subsequently undergo degradation in the proteasome. This ubiquitin–proteasome system controls a vast array of cellular programs, such as cell division, growth and differentiation.[5] Apart from proteolytic roles, ubiquitin modifications have diverse nonproteolytic effects on the substrates, span a wide spectrum that includes receptor internalization, intracellular trafficking, transcriptional activity, assembly of multiprotein complexes and regulation of enzymatic activity.[26, 27] RING-type E3 ligases can be divided into monomeric, homodimeric/heterodimeric and multisubunit RING E3 ligases.[28] Multisubunit RING-type E3 ligases include the cullin RING ligase superfamily and the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) complex. The largest member of cullin RING ligases known is the S phase kinase-associated protein 1 (SKP1)–cullin1 (CUL1)–F-box protein (SCF) complex; in this complex F-box protein is in charge of targeting specific phosphorylated substrate(s) for degradation (Figure 1).[10, 18] Deregulation of the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis could result in uncontrolled cell growth, genome instability and carcinogenesis. Some members of the RING family are known to be engaged in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell cycle, cell apoptosis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, depending on the cellular contexts, level of enzyme expression and their target substrates.[13, 14, 15, 17] Cancers including CRC often harbor promoter methylation, copy number variations or functional mutations in E3 ligases that mediate their deregulation to disturb cancer-related pathways and promote tumorigenesis.[2]

Mechanisms of ring-type E3 ligases in CRC

Monomeric RING domain E3 ligase

RNF family

Ring Finger Protein 4 (RNF4) is a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-targeting RING domain ubiquitin ligase that directly connects the SUMO and the ubiquitin pathways, resulting in the proteasomal degradation of poly-SUMO-modified substrates.[29] SUMO-targeting RING-type E3 ligase-mediated ubiquitylation does not only target substrates for proteolysis, but also affects protein–protein interactions, subcellular localization and transcriptional activation.[30] RNF4s are increased in 30% of colon adenocarcinoma patients as compared with normal colon tissues and adenomas, indicating a potential tumorigenic role of RNF4 in CRC.[31] RNF4 has been reported to target several oncoproteins including β-catenin, c-Myc, c-Jun and Notch intracellular-domain proteins for ubiquitylation in a phosphorylation-dependent manner.[31, 32] Paradoxically, RNF4-mediated ubiquitylation of these proteins does not induce proteasomal degradation. Instead, RNF4 activates these oncoproteins by protein stabilization, thereby enhancing the transcriptional activities of Wnt and Notch signaling pathways. Functionally, RNF4 augments the tumorigenic signaling cascades and is crucial for cancer cell survival. RNF4 has a particularly important role in CRC by regulating Wnt signaling. Tight regulation of Wnt signaling is important for cell proliferation, maintenance of pluripotency and the differentiation of stem cells of the intestine.[33, 34] Aberrant activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling is a major hallmark of cancer that presents in >90% of CRC, induced by either inactivating mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene or activating mutations in β-catenin.[4, 35, 36] Defects in APC disrupt the β-catenin degradation complex, resulting in the stabilization and activation of β-catenin, a key transcription factor for Wnt signaling. Consequently, active β-catenin translocates to the nucleus where it interacts with the lymphoid enhancer factor/T-cell factor (LEF/TCF) complex to excite a Wnt transcriptional cascade that is essential for CRC development.[37, 38] RNF4 stabilized β-catenin and c-Myc by ubiquitylation, leading to enhanced and prolonged Wnt/β-catenin signal activation. RNF4-mediated stabilization of these Wnt key regulators may therefore function as an enhancer to exacerbate Wnt/β-catenin signaling and drive colorectal carcinogenesis. Recently, another member of the RNF family protein, RNF14, was also found to activate Wnt signaling in CRC.[39] RNF14 binds to LEF/TCF transcription factors and activates Wnt signaling in CRC cells and zebrafish models.[39] RNF14 functions as a key interacting partner for the TCF/β–catenin complex through facilitating the recruitment of β-catenin and stabilizing its interaction with LEF/TCF, thus ensuring a high transcriptional activity even at low levels of nuclear β-catenin.[39, 40] RNF14 is crucial for CRC cell survival, and its depletion suppressed colorectal tumorigenesis. RNF43 and its homolog zinc and ring finger 3 (ZNRF3) are highly related RING finger proteins. Both ZNRF3 and RNF43 are localized to the cell plasma membrane and are defined as cell-surface transmembrane E3 ubiquitin ligases.[41] The constructions of these two proteins consist of a signal peptide, an extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain as well as an intracellular RING domain. RNF43 is often mutated in CRC. One large-scale genomic analysis reported that over 18% of colorectal adenocarcinomas possess RNF43 somatic mutations.[42] RNF43 together with ZNRF3 utilize Disheveled Segment Polarity Protein as an adaptor to recognize specific Wnt frizzled receptors including Fzd1-5/8 and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6.[43] RNF43 and ZNRF3 mediated the ubiquitylation of seven transmembrane domains of frizzled receptors specifically in the cytoplasmic loops. Ubiquitinated Wnt receptors subsequently undergo endocytosis and degradation in the lysosomes, thereby suppressing Wnt signals[44, 45] (Figure 2). In light of these findings, RNF43/ZNRF3 is a negative regulator of Wnt signaling via endocytosis and degradation of Wnt receptors, leading to suppressed intracellular Wnt cascade and tumor suppression. Interestingly, mutations of RNF43/ZNRF3 were mutually exclusive with APC truncation mutations in CRC.[42] The mutually exclusive nature of RNF43/ZNRF3 or APC mutations suggests that the inactivation of either of these genes is sufficient to drive Wnt/β-catenin signaling and CRC, and that these mutations are functionally redundant.
Figure 2

Regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and oncogenic NF-κB pathway by ubiquitylating enzymes in CRC. Transmembrane E3 ligases RNF43 and ZNRF3 utilize disheveled segment polarity protein (DVL) as an adaptor to induce the endocytosis of Frizzled–LRP5/6 complex and abrogation of Wnt signaling. Binding of Wnt proteins to Wnt receptors results in the inactivation of GSK3β. β-catenin remains unphosphorylated, and it translocates to the nucleus where it binds to the LEF/TCF transcription complex, activating Wnt/β-catenin downstream target gene transcription. In the absence of Wnt, the scaffolding protein AXIN assembles a multiprotein destruction complex that consists of β-catenin, APC and GSK3β. β-catenin is phosphorylated by GSK3β and recognized by SCF-β-TrCP, leading to ubiquitylation and degradation of β-catenin. XIAP induces monoubiquitylation of TLE and releases TLE from the TCF/LEF complex, thereby initiating a canonical Wnt transcriptional program in CRC. K63-linked ubiquitylation of TRAF6 leads to the recruitment of the IKK (IκB kinase) complex (α, β, γ) and activation of IKK through TRAF6-mediated polyubiquitination. Activation of IKK kinase complex results in SCF-β-TrCP-mediated ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of IκB (inhibitor of NF-κB kinase), thereby enabling the translocation of p50 and p65 to the nucleus and induction of NF-κB target genes, leading to positive regulation of NF-κB signaling. FBW7 preferentially targets phosphorylated JUN both by GSK3β or JNK and promotes JUN degradation in the proteasome. Accordingly, FBW7 depletion results in accumulation of phosphorylated JUN and stimulation of AP-1 activity. AP-1, activator protein 1; AXIN, axis inhibition protein; DVL, disheveled segment polarity protein; FBW7, F-box and WD repeat domain-containing 7; GSK3β, glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta; JUN, AP-1 transcription factor subunit; LEF/TCF, lymphoid enhancer factor/T-cell factor; LRP5/6, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6; TRAF6, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor; XIAP, X-chromosome-linked inhibitor of apoptotic proteins.

Similar to RNF43/ZNRF3, RNF20 and RNF40 also function as tumor suppressor genes in CRC, but with distinct subcellular localization and mechanism of action. RNF20/40s are nuclear-localized E3 ubiquitin ligases that monoubiquitylate histone H2B (H2Bub1) to modulate the chromatin binding of NF-κB.[46] NF-κB is a key regulator of inflammation and tumor immunity, which has a crucial role in inflammation-associated CRC.[47] Subsequently, the downregulation of RNF20 and H2Bub1 augments NF-κB activity and attenuates the antitumoral T-cell response to induce chronic inflammation and inflammation-associated CRC. Moreover, RNF20/40 and H2Bub1 were frequently downregulated in ulcerative colitis and colitis-associated CRC in human, further confirming their clinical relevance.[46] Blockade of NF-κB alone or in combination with antitumor drugs may be used to target CRC with inactivating mutations in RNF20/RNF40. Another RING E3 ligase protein participating in the NF-κB pathway is tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6/RNF85), which contains a RING domain interspersed with four zinc-finger motifs, a central coiled-coil domain and a highly conserved TRAF-C domain.[48] TRAF6 is upregulated in CRC with positive expression in 66.7% of 135 CRC patients as determined by immunohistochemistry.[49] TRAF6 functions as a signal transducer by activating NF-κB kinase (IKK), a key enzyme complex of the NF-κB pathway in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines in colon cancer cells.[50] Mechanistically, TRAF6 collaborates with Ubc13/Uev1A catalyze the assembly of K63-linked polyubiquitin chains, which, in turn, activates IKK.[51]

TRIM family

The TRIM family is the largest subfamily of RING-type E3 ligases, which is defined as comprising an N-terminal RING domain, one or two B-boxes and a coiled-coil domain.[52] Approximately 70 TRIM genes have been recognized in humans and have been subclassified on the basis of the differences in their C-terminal domain.[21] Most of the TRIM proteins function as E3 ubiquitin ligases, and they are engaged in various processes such as cell proliferation, apoptosis and transcriptional regulation.[7, 21, 52] Depending on modification type, ubiquitylation of their substrates could lead to activation, inhibition, proteasomal or lysosomal degradation. TRIM3 exerts a tumor-suppressive effect in CRC progression through the regulation of p53.[53] TRIM15 and TRIM40 are other tumor-suppressive TRIM proteins specifically downregulated in CRC.[54] TRIM15 colocalizes with focal adhesions and it suppresses cell migration. TRIM15 interacts with actin cytoskeleton dynamics-related proteins, such as coronin 1B, cortactin, filamin-binding LIM protein 1 and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein to regulate cell migration.[54] TRIM40 negatively regulates NF-κB activity via ubiquitin-like modification of inhibitor of NF-κB kinase subunit gamma (IKKγ), thus preventing inflammation-associated carcinogenesis in the gut.[55]

Dimeric RING domain E3 ligase

MDM2/MDMX ligase

The tumor suppressor p53 has a critical role in regulating cell cycle, cell apoptosis, DNA repair and senescence.[56] TP53 is one of the most frequently mutated genes in CRC. Approximately 50–60% of CRCs harbor TP53 mutations, resulting in p53 inactivation or loss.[57] The dimeric RING-type E3 ligase MDM2 is one of the major regulators of p53. MDM2 directly binds with p53 and forms a protein complex, mediating p53 degradation via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway.[58, 59] Overexpression of MDM2 is an early event in CRC progression and is positively correlated with p53 loss.[19] In vivo mouse models clearly demonstrated that the inactivation or loss of p53 stimulates tumorigenesis, whereas established tumors are disappeared or diminished after restoration of p53.[60] These data indicate that recovery of wild-type p53 function is a valid therapeutic approach, and the specific targeting of MDM2/MDMX to reactivate p53 is a viable anticancer strategy.[61] On the basis of this notion, structure-based drug design has led to the discovery of several MDM2 or MDMX antagonists that block the interactions between murine double minute (MDM) and p53, leading to p53 stabilization and activation for cancer treatment.[62]

IAP Family/XIAP

Human inhibitor of apoptotic protein (IAP) family comprised X-chromosome-linked IAP (XIAP), cellular IAP1/2, melanoma IAP and IAP-like protein 2.[63] A growing amount of evidence establishes that IAP proteins target substrates in the ubiquitin–proteasome system degradation machinery. Targeting of proteins for degradation could occur not only by their own RING domains, but also through forming protein complexes with other IAPs containing the RING domains. IAPs monoubiquitinate or polyubiquitinate their binding partners, including activated caspases, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1) and NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK), proteins that mainly participate in apoptosis and TNF and NF-κB signaling cascade[64, 65] (Figure 3). Both TNF and NF-κB are correlated with colitis-associated CRC. Several IAP family proteins such as XIAP, cIAP1 and cIAP2 are upregulated in CRC. Notably, increased expression of apoptosis regulator cIAP2 was significantly associated with shorter survival of CRC patients.[66]
Figure 3

Regulation of important signaling pathways by E3 ubiquitin ligases in CRC. β-TrCP mediates polyubiquitination and degradation of phosphorylated KRAS. Loss of β-TrCP causes accumulation of active KRAS and the activation of downstream MAPK and m-TOR signaling to promote CRC progression. MDM2/MDMX directly binds to p53, and it mediates p53 degradation in the ubiquitin–proteasome system to inhibit the p53 pathway in CRC. XIAP promotes ubiquitylation and degradation of a number of caspase proteins to inhibit the caspase-dependent apoptosis pathway in CRC development. APC-type E3 ligase CDH1 cooperates with SCF-type E3 ligase SKP2 in governing cell cycle progression in CRC. β-TrCP, β-transducin repeat-containing protein; CDH1, Cadherin 1; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; m-TOR, the mechanistic target of rapamycin; SKP2, S phase kinase-associated protein 2; XIAP, X-chromosome-linked IAP.

XIAP is an important factor in the regulation of apoptosis induction as it acts as a potent caspase inhibitor.[63, 67] XIAP contains three structural domains, the baculoviral IAP repeat domain, the UBA domain and the RING domain.[68] The RING domain of XIAP processes E3 ubiquitin enzyme activity in the C-terminal and it promotes autoubiquitylation as well as transubiquitylation of their binding partners. In CRC, XIAP inhibits caspase-3 activity by ubiquitining active p17 and mediating its degradation via proteasome in HCT-116 cells harboring PIK3CA mutations.[69] XIAP is thus a potential druggable target (TRAIL) to reverse TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand resistance phenotype in PIK3CA-mutant CRC. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-targeted drugs in combination with XIAP-targeting molecules may expand the limited therapeutic probabilities for this subtype of CRC patients. Another study revealed an alternative oncogenic effect of XIAP, which involved the monoubiquitylation of TLE. TLE is a potent repressor of the TCF/LEF complex. Ubiquitylation of TLE releases TLE from the TCF/LEF complex, thereby allowing β-catenin to bind to LEF/TCF and initiate a canonical Wnt transcriptional program in CRC.[70] Notably, XIAP-mediated ubiquitylation mainly alters TLE protein subcellular location, rather than promoting its degradation.[71]

Multisubunit RING domain E3 ligase

SCF-type E3 ligase

One large family of RING-based E3 ligase is known as SCF. SCFs utilize Cullin1 as the scaffold protein, F-box as receptors of substrates and RBX1/2 as E3 ubiquitin ligases.[72] This superfamily of E3 ligases has vital roles in cancer biology. The RING domain coordinating with zinc ions is essential for SCF-type E3 ligase activity. A number of studies have demonstrated the roles of SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligases in controlling cell size, proliferation and growth; their deregulation has been participated in abnormal cell growth and tumorigenesis.[73, 74] Three well-characterized SCF complex family members are β-transducin repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP), F-box and WD repeat domain-containing 7, and SKP2 in CRC.

β-TrCP

β-TrCP is an F-box protein that acts as the substrate-recognition subunit for the SCFβ-TrCP E3 ubiquitin ligase, which mediates the ubiquitylation of various crucial substrates and post-translationally marks substrates for degradation, including β-catenin, p53, Yap and NF-κB inhibitor (IKB).[75, 76, 77] Two paralogs of this F-box protein exist in humans, β-TrCP1 and β-TrCP2, which have uniform functions and appear to be superfluous in their biological effects. Among the SCF-type E3 ligase, the expression of β-TrCP1 was found to be upregulated in CRC, particularly in the metastases in CRC patients.[78] As mentioned previously, activated Wnt signaling contributes to CRC development. The level of active β-catenin is normally under control of the β-catenin destruction complex, consisting of APC, glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta, casein kinase I a and Axin2.[79] Without or due to lack of Wnt signal stimulation, these proteins act in collaboration to phosphorylate β-catenin.[80, 81, 82] Phosphorylated β-catenin is then targeted by β-TrCP1/2 for ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation (Figure 2),[83, 84] thereby suppressing the Wnt transcriptional cascade. Hence, β-TrCP1/2 functions as a tumor suppressor, negatively regulating Wnt signaling. KRAS mutation is an early and common event in CRC. Mutant KRAS is a key driver oncogene in CRC and it predicts poor outcome in CRC patients.[85] Experimental evidence indicates that β-TrCP mediates the ubiquitylation and degradation of activated KRAS (GTP-bound). Loss of β-TrCP impairs KRAS degradation, thus causing the accumulation of active KRAS and the activation of its downstream effectors (Figure 3).[86, 87] This constitutes an alternative mechanism by which β-TrCP exerts a tumor-suppressive effect in CRC development. However, Baker et al. established recently that Ras protein monoubiquitination suppresses GAP-mediated hydrolysis and increases the proportion of activated (GTP-bound) Ras.[88] Monoubiquitination modulates Ras activity and enhances affinity of downstream effectors such as Raf and PI3 kinase to promote tumorigenesis.[89] By changing the activity of oncoproteins via ubiquitination, this ubiquitination machinery may provide a new therapeutic target for CRC treatment. Despite these in vitro findings, β-TrCP1 is paradoxically upregulated in 56% of the CRC as compared with normal tissue, and its overexpression was correlated with reduced apoptosis and worse prognosis.[78] Elevated activity of β-TRCP has been widely detected in CRC cells, and it has been suggested that β-TrCP is enhanced as part of a negative feedback in response to β-catenin/TCF activation.[90] However, such upregulation might be futile in CRC because of mutations in APC, Axin or β-catenin, which impair β-catenin phosphorylation and hence weaken its degradation by β-TrCP.[91, 92, 93] In such a case, the tumor-suppressive effect of β-TrCP is attenuated. On the other hand, β-TrCP might exert an oncogenic effect by modulating the NF-κB pathway. β-TrCP has been found to bind with phosphorylated IKBs, inhibitors of NF-κB, and to mediate their proteasomal degradation.[78, 90] Decreased IKB expression in turn enables the nuclear translocation and transcriptional activation of NF-κB, which contributes to the inhibition of apoptosis and promotion of tumor metastasis.[78, 90] Thus, the upregulation of β-TrCP may exert a positive or negative effect on CRC, depending on the presence of co-occurring mutations and the level of β-TrCP expression. Many key regulatory proteins and substrates are regulated by β-TrCP in a tissue-specific manner. Some of the known β-TrCP substrates like Cyclin D1, WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase and cell division cycle 25A are cell cycle regulators.[94] Some proteins, such as myeloid cell leukemia 1 and pro-caspase-3, targeted for degradation by β-TrCP are implicated in cell apoptosis.[95, 96] Furthermore, β-TrCP also functions in cell adhesion and migration through regulation of Snail, the suppressor of E-cadherin in a phosphorylation-dependent manner.[97] Recent work has also shown that β-TrCP1 targets the FOXO3 tumor suppressor,[98] and epigenetic regulators including chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 1 for phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitylation degradation.[99] Given the promiscuity of β-TrCP, it is perhaps not surprising that β-TrCP has contradictory roles in tumorigenesis in a context-dependent manner.

FBW7

FBW7 is another F-box protein that functions as a substrate receptor for SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligase to promote polyubiquitylation.[100] FBW7 degrades several key oncoproteins including Cyclin E, JUN, Mcl-1, MYC, Notch and aurora kinase A in a phosphorylation-dependent manner.[101, 102] Most of these targeted substrates are key transcription regulators, allowing FBW7 to regulate multiple pathways with oncogenic signature that are in charge of gene expression clusters, thus extending the impact of FBW7 far beyond its direct substrates. Previous studies discovered that 6–10% of CRC contains FBW7 mutations.[103] Somatic FBW7 mutation was also detected in 9% of family adenomatous polyposis carcinomas or hereditary non-polyposis CRC.[104] Given that FBW7 targets oncogenic proteins for degradation, it possesses a tumor-suppressive character and functions in cell division, growth and differentiation pathways.[105] Mutation of Fbw7 combined with Apc has been shown to promote CRC in mice.[106, 107] Transforming growth factor-beta-induced factor and kruppel-like factor (KLF5) were elevated in Apc tumors, and these proteins were strong candidates for mediating the oncogenic effect and may cause a similar consequence in Fbw7-mutant human CRC.[108] In another transgenic mouse model of CRC, co-deletion of p53 and Fbw7 induced malignant adenocarcinomas that exert strong invasiveness and metastatic abilities.[108] These tumors exhibited a chromosomal unstable feature, and dual p53 and Fbw7 knockout represents a novel mouse model of metastatic and chromosomally unstable CRC.[109]

SKP2

SKP2 primarily regulates cell cycle regulators via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway.[110] SKP2 protein exerts a remarkable impact on the progression of CRC. Overexpression of SKP2 promotes cell proliferation in normal colon cells, whereas knockdown of SKP2 inhibited cell proliferation and induced the apoptosis of SW620 colon cancer cells.[111, 112] SKP2, as an F-box protein, recognizes cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors p27kip1 and p21 and mediates their ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation.[113] Degradation of p21 and p27 by SKP2 activates CDK1 and CDK2 and promotes S and G2 cell cycle phase progression, thereby positively regulating the cell cycle[114] (Figure 3). In keeping with this possibility, drugs that target SKP2 could block cell cycle progression and inhibit tumor growth. The upregulation of SKP2 in colon cancer patients is correlated with a decrease in its target p27, and this phenotype is correlated with malignant tumor behavior and poor clinical outcomes.[115, 116] SKP2 may be utilized as a novel independent prognostic marker for CRC.

APC/C-type E3 Ligase

Besides SCF ubiquitin ligases, the APC/C is another major multisubunit RING-type E3 ligase. Among the APC core constituents, co-activators cell division cycle 20 (Cdc20) and Cadherin 1 (Cdh1) have been well characterized. Intriguingly, even though both Cdc20 and Cdh1 have the ability to catalyze the APC-type E3 ligase complex, they may exert opposing roles in tumorigenesis because different substrates are recognized and targeted for degradation.[117] APC-type E3 ligases are primarily involved in governing cell cycle progression, especially in the mitosis phase.[6]

APCCdc20

Emerging evidence indicates that Cdc20 is elevated in CRC cell lines and in primary CRC tissues compared with normal colon cells and adjacent non-tumor tissues.[118] Cdc20 expression was correlated with advanced tumor stage, tumor metastasis and shorter overall survival of patients, suggesting that Cdc20 could be utilized as a promising predictor for human CRC. Another study also revealed that Cdc20 expression was increased markedly in 77% of CRC cases in further support of this finding.[119] In line with these findings, Cdc20 depletion suppressed Wnt signaling through the upregulation of conductin. In addition, conductin with Cdc20-resistant CRC cells manifested Wnt signaling inhibition and weakened colony formation vability.[120] Therefore, Cdc20 overexpression exerts an oncogenic role in colorectal tumorigenesis.

APCCdh1

In contrast to Cdc20, Cdh1 (E-cadherin) might display a tumor-suppressive effect in human colorectal carcinogenesis.[121] Loss function of E-cadherin has been well demonstrated in the pathogenesis of sporadic CRC, and Cdh1 gene mutation also predisposes to early-onset CRC.[122] APCCdh1 may function as a tumor suppressor through proteolysis of SKP2 protein in colorectal tumorigenesis.[123] Several APCCdh1 targets, which include Aurora A, Aurora B, Cyclin B, microtubule nucleation factor (Tpx2), Cdc6 and Cdc20, are correlated with cell cycle progression, and their degradation via ubiquitylation suppressed tumorigenesis.[74] Correspondingly, the downregulation of E-cadherin is frequently detected in CRC, and it thus can be used as a prognostic marker in CRC patients.[124]

Ring-type E3 ligases as promising biomarkers in CRC

RING-type E3 ligases are often deregulated at the early stage of tumorigenesis, and hence might serve as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis (Table 1). RNF43 is one of the most frequently mutated genes in CRCs, and somatic mutations of RNF43 are present in ~17.6–18.9% of CRC patients in different cohorts.[125] Truncated mutations of RNF43 are mutually exclusive with loss of function mutations of APC in colorectal tumors. RNF43 mutations are predominately caused by small insertions/deletions in homopolymeric tracts, with a high proportion in the microsatellite instability CRC types. Overall, RNF43 is mutated in 79.7% of high microsatellite instability colorectal adenocarcinomas.[42] TRIM29 expression is increased in human precancerous aberrant crypt foci biopsy tissues compared with normal colon mucosa biopsies by colonoscopy.[126] That indicates that TRIM29 may be a suitable marker for the early diagnosis of CRC. Survivin is one of the IAP protein family members related to anti-apoptotic pathways.[127] Overwhelming evidence indicates that survivin expression is elevated in precancerous lesions such as tubular adenomas and low-grade dysplasia, suggesting that survivin upregulation is an early event in colorectal tumor formation.[128, 129] Thus, survivin could be a promising biomarker for early screening of CRC. In addition, high expression of survivin is maintained throughout the progression from normal mucosa–adenoma to carcinoma, suggesting that survivin may be a suitable biomarker throughout different stages of carcinogenesis. Alterations in RING-type E3 ligases are also useful biomarkers for predicting prognosis and therapeutic response. To date, therapeutic targeting of the Wnt pathway has only yielded meagre clinical benefit.[130] This could be attributed to a lack of patient selection. E3 ligases RNF43 and ZNRF3 are two transmembrane enzymes that remove Wnt receptors from cell surface and represent the first upstream Wnt pathway component mutated in CRC.[41] Patients with RNF43 and ZNRF3 gene deletion or inactivation mutation are thus predicted to benefit from the administration of Wnt antagonist or Wnt pathway inhibitors. Indeed, Wnt inhibitors are highly effective in suppressing the growth of CRC-harboring RNF43/ZNRF3 mutations. Both Wnt-specific acyltransferase porcupine (PORCN) inhibitors, C59 and LGK974, are effective in suppressing growth of RNF43/ZNRF3-mutant intestinal tumors in vivo.[131, 132] The cultured organoids biopsy from CRC patients that possesses RNF43 mutations respond sensitively to the FZD5 antibody treatment, revealing mutant RNF43 as a potential tractable target for therapeutic antibodies.[133] FBW7 is the fourth most commonly mutated gene in CRC.[107] CRC-harboring FBW7 mutations are insensitive to blockade of mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK signaling by targeted therapy of sorafenib or regorafenib.[134] Mechanistically, CRC cells carrying FBW7 mutations are deficient in apoptosis and demonstrate attenuated degradation of Mcl-1, which will cause resistance to regorafenib.[135] Besides FBW7 mutations, mRNA level of FBW7 was significantly lower in CRC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. Low expression of FBW7 indicates a worse survival in CRC patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that FBW7 expression is an independent predictor in CRC patients.[136] Thus, FBW7 expression may be a suitable prognostic factor for patients with CRC.

Ring-type E3 ligases as therapeutic targets

E3 ligases are attractive drug targets for cancer therapy, given the pivotal roles exhibited by E3 ligases in the regulation of diverse and important cellular pathways, including Wnt, p53, K-ras and oncogenic NF-κB in CRC. Compared with bortezomib, the general proteasome inhibitor, which non-selectively blocks the whole system protein degradation,[137] compounds that target a particular E3 enzyme are expected to more selectively modulate the levels of proteins, thereby rendering improved specificity with minimal toxicity. Therefore, targeting RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligases to anticancer has harvested growing attention. Targeting E3 ubiquitin ligases using small molecular weight compounds or neutralizing antibodies is currently being designed and tested in different preclinical cancer models as well as in clinical trials (Table 2). One of the most efficient therapeutic agent targeting E3 ligases is arsenic trioxide, which is used clinically to treat APL patients. Arsenic trioxide exhibits its chemotherapeutic effect though promoting the degradation of PML zinc-finger protein and retinoic acid receptor alpha (PML-RAR-α), a driver oncogenic fusion gene present in APL.[138] Arsenic trioxide induces the oligomerization of PML-RAR-α and strengthens its interaction with SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9, leading to elevated SUMOylation. SUMOylation of PML-RAR-α triggers the recruitment of RNF4 into PML-nuclear bodies to ubiquitylate the fusion oncoprotein PML-RAR-α and promote its proteasomal degradation.[139, 140] It would be of great interest to measure whether some RNF proteins can be activated in a similar manner in CRC to suppress oncogenic signaling. Many experimental agents targeting RING-type E3 ligases are also entering the cancer drug pipeline. Specific targeting of either MDM2 or MDMX is a promising approach to recover the activity of wild-type p53 for cancer therapy.[62] Targeting MDM2 ubiquitin ligase with small molecules or compounds has been recently developed and is being tested in cancer models. HLI98, for example, specifically inhibits Hdm2 to activate p53 signaling pathway and induce apoptosis in cancer.[141] Structure-based drug design has also obtained (MDM) antagonists that disturb the interaction between (MDM) and p53, resulting in p53 reactivation for cancer treatment. Gu et al. utilized chemical screening to identify novel inhibitors of MDM2 protein–XIAP mRNA interaction, which suppresses MDM2 stability and blocks XIAP translation, leading to both antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in cancer models. In p53 wild-type cancers, MDM2/XIAP inhibitors can degrade MDM2 to activate p53 and induce apoptosis, whereas in p53-deficient cancers inhibition of XIAP expression can also activate caspase cascade to induce apoptosis. Importantly, one of the MDM2/XIAP inhibitors, MX69, showed no obvious effect on normal human hematopoiesis inhibition and with a good tolerance in animal models.[142] Ceramide and its analog LCL85 induce the protein degradation of cIAP1 and XIAP in the proteasome and sensitize primary and metastatic CRC cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis.[143, 144] In vivo LCL85 is an effective sensitizer for Fas-mediated apoptosis, and it inhibits lung metastasis in preclinical mouse tumor models at a non-cytotoxic dose.[143] By targeting these two ligases, ceramide might enhance the efficacy of Fas ligand-based CRC therapy, particularly cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-based immunotherapy.[145] Compounds such as MLN4924, CC0651 and pro-TAME have been developed to target key subunits of the SCF or APC/C complex, which have shown promising efficacy in CRC with some of them entering clinical trials.[146] One recent study revealed that treatment of HT-29 and HCT-116 cells with the SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase inhibitor MLN4924 efficiently sensitized CRC cells to irradiation. MLN4924 enhanced radiation sensitivity by inducing cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase, cell apoptosis and DNA damage, and this effect was dependent on p27.[147] Further preclinical work will be needed to verify the effectiveness and safety of MLN4924 as a valid radiosensitizing agent against CRC. MLN4924-mediated inhibition of cullin neddylation has shown prospect in the preclinical cancer models.[146, 148] CC0651 selectively inhibits E2 enzyme human Cdc34 and evidently influences the core components Skp2, Cul1 and Rbx1 of SCF, thus potently inhibiting the ubiquitination of p27Kip1 by E3 ligase SCFSkp2.[149, 150] CC0651 and its analogs are able to inhibit proliferation of CRC cells and cause the accumulation of p27Kip1, a SCFSkp2 substrate.[149] Pro-TAME inhibits APC-Cdh1 activation and induces mitotic arrest in cancer cells.[151] Reducing Cdc20 expression sensitizes cells to the effect of pro-TAME, consistent with the APCCdc20 interaction as the relevant target of this compound.[151] Moreover, experimental evidence indicates that Apcin and a few apcin synthetic derivatives synergize with pro-TAME to inhibit mitotic exit in human CRC cells.[152, 153] The major concerns of E3 ligase for clinical application are lack of specificity for the intended E3 ligase, which might result in unwanted side effects and give rise to drug resistance. Several high-throughput screening assays are now used for the fast filtrating of small molecular compounds of E3 ligases; specific antagonists of E3 ubiquitin enzymes will continue to be investigated as a promising kind of anticancer drugs.[154] Progress in elucidating the structural aspects of RING-type E3 ligases will provide clues for rational drug design. Chemical crosslinkers are beneficial to study the structures of intermediates generated by E3-catalyzed reactions, allowing to anatomize the distinct catalytic processes during the E3 enzymes catalyzing substrate ubiquitylation. Apart from targeting E3 ligases' activity directly, another strategy is to develop homologs of tumor-suppressive RING-type E3 ligases that aim to antagonize their target proteins. In addition, recent work has revealed that ubiquitylation is an invertible process involving ubiquitylation as well as deubiquitylation. Restrain of deubiquitylation enzymes may provide a conceivable cancer therapeutic modality in the future.

Conclusions and future perspectives

In recent years, we have gained deeper insights into the regulation of E3 ligases and the mechanisms underlying E3 ligase-mediated ubiquitin–proteasome degradation. Moreover, large-scale genomic studies have uncovered genomic amplification, deletions, mutations and aberrant epigenetic regulation that lead to the deregulation of RING-type E3 ligases in cancers.[154] Further work should aim to unveil the function(s) of individual RING-type E3 ligases in tumorigenesis and comprehensively elucidate their mechanisms of action. In the past few years we have seen much progress in the development of small molecule drugs that target E3 ligase receptors or adaptors to block aberrant signaling cascades in CRC. With accumulating structural information regarding individual RING finger E3 ligases and their role in protein complexes, there is great potential for development of targeted therapeutics. Future work should aim to unveil the functions of the distinct E3 enzymes in the different cellular contexts, and elucidate the crystal structure of key regulators with therapeutic potential to facilitate rational drug development. E3 ligase-based cancer biomarkers will be verified and used in clinical practice as diagnostic approaches or prognostic indexes for the benefit of CRC patients.
  150 in total

Review 1.  The ubiquitin system.

Authors:  A Hershko; A Ciechanover
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  Structural insights into the catalysis and regulation of E3 ubiquitin ligases.

Authors:  Lori Buetow; Danny T Huang
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Dishevelled promotes Wnt receptor degradation through recruitment of ZNRF3/RNF43 E3 ubiquitin ligases.

Authors:  Xiaomo Jiang; Olga Charlat; Raffaella Zamponi; Yi Yang; Feng Cong
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  beta-Trcp couples beta-catenin phosphorylation-degradation and regulates Xenopus axis formation.

Authors:  C Liu; Y Kato; Z Zhang; V M Do; B A Yankner; X He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Targeted disruption of Skp2 results in accumulation of cyclin E and p27(Kip1), polyploidy and centrosome overduplication.

Authors:  K Nakayama; H Nagahama; Y A Minamishima; M Matsumoto; I Nakamichi; K Kitagawa; M Shirane; R Tsunematsu; T Tsukiyama; N Ishida; M Kitagawa; K Nakayama; S Hatakeyama
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Genome-wide CRISPR screens reveal a Wnt-FZD5 signaling circuit as a druggable vulnerability of RNF43-mutant pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Zachary Steinhart; Zvezdan Pavlovic; Megha Chandrashekhar; Traver Hart; Xiaowei Wang; Xiaoyu Zhang; Mélanie Robitaille; Kevin R Brown; Sridevi Jaksani; René Overmeer; Sylvia F Boj; Jarrett Adams; James Pan; Hans Clevers; Sachdev Sidhu; Jason Moffat; Stéphane Angers
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Pharmacologic inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex induces a spindle checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest in the absence of spindle damage.

Authors:  Xing Zeng; Frederic Sigoillot; Shantanu Gaur; Sungwoon Choi; Kathleen L Pfaff; Dong-Chan Oh; Nathaniel Hathaway; Nevena Dimova; Gregory D Cuny; Randall W King
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Cell cycle control of Wnt/β-catenin signalling by conductin/axin2 through CDC20.

Authors:  Michel V Hadjihannas; Dominic B Bernkopf; Martina Brückner; Jürgen Behrens
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer.

Authors:  Teresa A Soucy; Peter G Smith; Michael A Milhollen; Allison J Berger; James M Gavin; Sharmila Adhikari; James E Brownell; Kristine E Burke; David P Cardin; Stephen Critchley; Courtney A Cullis; Amanda Doucette; James J Garnsey; Jeffrey L Gaulin; Rachel E Gershman; Anna R Lublinsky; Alice McDonald; Hirotake Mizutani; Usha Narayanan; Edward J Olhava; Stephane Peluso; Mansoureh Rezaei; Michael D Sintchak; Tina Talreja; Michael P Thomas; Tary Traore; Stepan Vyskocil; Gabriel S Weatherhead; Jie Yu; Julie Zhang; Lawrence R Dick; Christopher F Claiborne; Mark Rolfe; Joseph B Bolen; Steven P Langston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  ZNRF3 promotes Wnt receptor turnover in an R-spondin-sensitive manner.

Authors:  Huai-Xiang Hao; Yang Xie; Yue Zhang; Olga Charlat; Emma Oster; Monika Avello; Hong Lei; Craig Mickanin; Dong Liu; Heinz Ruffner; Xiaohong Mao; Qicheng Ma; Raffaella Zamponi; Tewis Bouwmeester; Peter M Finan; Marc W Kirschner; Jeffery A Porter; Fabrizio C Serluca; Feng Cong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  MutEx: a multifaceted gateway for exploring integrative pan-cancer genomic data.

Authors:  Jie Ping; Olufunmilola Oyebamiji; Hui Yu; Scott Ness; Jeremy Chien; Fei Ye; Huining Kang; David Samuels; Sergey Ivanov; Danqian Chen; Ying-Yong Zhao; Yan Guo
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 2.  Posttranslational Modifications: Emerging Prospects for Cardiac Regeneration Therapy.

Authors:  Ya-Fei Li; Ya-Xin Wang; Hao Wang; Yao Ma; Lian-Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  N6-Isopentenyladenosine Inhibits Colorectal Cancer and Improves Sensitivity to 5-Fluorouracil-Targeting FBXW7 Tumor Suppressor.

Authors:  Donatella Fiore; Chiara Piscopo; Maria Chiara Proto; Michele Vasaturo; Fabrizio Dal Piaz; Bruno Marcello Fusco; Cristina Pagano; Chiara Laezza; Maurizio Bifulco; Patrizia Gazzerro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  RING Finger Protein 38 Mediates LIM Domain Binding 1 Degradation and Regulates Cell Growth in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ziming Huang; Peng Yang; Hengfa Ge; Chenchen Yang; Yong Cai; Zhen Chen; Wenze Tian; Haixiao Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Multifaceted Roles of TRIM Proteins in Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Eberhardt; Kristina Haeussler; Usman Nasrullah; Josef Pfeilschifter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  CircNR3C2 promotes HRD1-mediated tumor-suppressive effect via sponging miR-513a-3p in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Ya Fan; Jia Wang; Wen Jin; Yifei Sun; Yuemei Xu; Yipin Wang; Xiubin Liang; Dongming Su
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Ubiquitin-proteasome system and the role of its inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Fatemeh Aliabadi; Beheshteh Sohrabi; Ebrahim Mostafavi; Hamidreza Pazoki-Toroudi; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 6.411

Review 8.  The emerging role for Cullin 4 family of E3 ligases in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Jianping Guo; Brian J North; Kaixiong Tao; Pengbo Zhou; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 9.  Regulation of Wnt Signaling through Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination in Cancers.

Authors:  Hong-Beom Park; Ju-Won Kim; Kwang-Hyun Baek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Epigenetic modification and a role for the E3 ligase RNF40 in cancer development and metastasis.

Authors:  Junjiang Fu; Li Liao; Kyathegowdanadoddi Srinivasa Balaji; Chunli Wei; Jaehoon Kim; Jiangzhou Peng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.