Literature DB >> 25856207

Genetics of the serrated pathway to colorectal cancer.

Dmitriy Kedrin1, Manish K Gala1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25856207      PMCID: PMC4459531          DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2015.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2155-384X            Impact factor:   4.488


× No keyword cloud information.
Accounting for ~15% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs), the serrated pathway represents an alternate mechanism of colorectal carcinogenesis that yields microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors and the overwhelming fraction of “sporadic” microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) tumors. Moreover, the MSI-H tumors derived from the serrated pathway are more common of the two, and frequently display excessive CpG island promoter hypermethylation (CIMP-high; Table 1). This promoter hypermethylation results in epigenetic silencing of a large number of tumor-suppressor genes, including MLH1, which causes the associated MSI-H phenotype. Somatic mutations typically include activating mutations in BRAF (V600E), and less commonly KRAS or aberrant EGFR activation, which occur during the early stages of serrated polyp development. In contrast to tubular adenomas, bilallelic inactivation of APC is not an initiating event in this pathway (Figure 1). Despite this molecular understanding and the development of novel drugs to target them, additional treatments are still needed given the inferior outcomes observed in BRAF-mutated colon cancers within the context of their microsatellite status.[1]
Table 1

Important acronyms and definitions

AcronymDefinition
CIMPCpG Island Methylator Phenotype (high or low). Excessive methylation of the CpG islands in gene promoters which results in transcriptional silencing. A panel of genes is used to determine this status.
MSI-HMicrosatellite Instability High. Errors at repeating nucleotides of 1-6 base pairs in length that may result in frameshift mutations. A panel of microsatellites determined by the National Cancer Institute, colloquially referred to as the Bethesda markers, is used to assess this trait.
MSSMicrosatellite Stable
OISOncogene-induced senescence. A tumor-suppressive mechanism by which oncogene activation triggers a process to initiate cell growth arrest.
Figure 1

Serrated Pathway to Colorectal Cancer. Schematic comparing the mutational changes involved from normal mucosa to colorectal cancer. The top half represents the conventional pathway to colorectal cancer, with the most frequent mutational events described. The bottom half demonstrates common events in the serrated pathway.

Discovery of high-risk genetic variants for this pathway represents a promising strategy to identify additional therapeutic targets for this subset of colorectal cancers. Epidemiologic data from families of serrated polyposis patients strongly suggest a heritable predisposition exists toward serrated colorectal carcinogenesis. First-degree relatives of serrated polyposis patients are at significantly higher elevated risk of developing serrated polyps themselves. In addition, elevated pleiotropic cancer risks are present in these families. An Australian cohort demonstrated that relatives are at an increased risk of pancreatic cancer.[2] First-degree relatives of those with MSI-H CRC who do not have Lynch syndrome or serrated polyposis are at increased risk (standardized incidence ratios) of developing stomach, ovarian, and liver cancers.[3] Through exome sequencing of individuals who develop multiple sessile serrated polyps and/or serrated polyposis, we recently identified novel high-risk variants for the serrated pathway.[4] We demonstrated that such individuals are approximately fourfold enriched for rare, germline loss-of-function (LoF) mutations (defined as nonsense and splice-site mutations) in genes responsible for oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) mechanisms. OIS is a tumor-suppressive mechanism that is activated by the replicative and metabolic stress caused by oncogenic transformation. This hypothesis was based on the observations from genetic mouse models of serrated neoplasia in which the BRAF V600E mutation or activating KRAS mutation was alone sufficient to induce serrated neoplasia in the long-term; however, in the short-term, OIS barriers prevented rapid tumorigenesis.[5, 6, 7] Concurrent inactivation of these OIS mechanisms with activating BRAF/KRAS mutations greatly expedited serrated neoplasia formation. In humans, activation of these critical OIS pathways (ATMATR DNA damage pathway and p16-RB pathway) has been previously demonstrated to be relevant in colonic precursor lesions in addition to lesions in other tissue types. Several of the OIS genes identified in serrated polyposis patients in this study (ATM, RBL1, and XAF1) have been previously implicated in human or animal studies of colorectal carcinogenesis. We next demonstrated that the remaining patients with serrated polyposis (who do not have an obvious loss-of-function mutation) actually harbor deleterious variants in genes previously unassociated, but critical to these OIS mechanisms. Cross-referencing all rare LoF mutations found in patients with an orthogonal database (not dependent on senescence characteristics) of all genes implicated in cancer by genome-wide association studies, we discovered two unrelated individuals with identical nonsense mutations in RNF43, a gene frequently mutated in mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas and stomach that encodes for a negative regulator of Wnt signaling through Wnt receptor endocytosis. This enrichment in cases of serrated polyposis was significant over controls with sizeable effect sizes (odds ratio 460, P=6.8 × 10−5). Analysis of publicly available microarrays of sporadic serrated polyps and tubular adenomas, we found RNF43 to be significantly downregulated in the serrated pathway. Through functional experiments in pancreatic duct cells harboring the KRAS G12D oncogene, we demonstrated that silencing of RNF43 impaired ATRATM DNA damage signaling in response to UV radiation, as evident by impaired phosphorylation of Chk1 and p53. Subsequently, another group has further generalized the importance of RNF43 to the development of sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancers.[8] Performing whole-exome sequencing on 185 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded colon cancers from two Harvard cohorts, Giannakis et al. discovered deleterious somatic mutations in RNF43 to be present in 18.9% of these cancers, in addition to being frequently mutated in endometrial cancers. Interestingly, 50% of the deleterious mutations discovered were frameshift mutations occurring at microsatellite loci within the gene. Validation of a small subset of tumors by next-generation sequencing or Sanger sequencing demonstrated an overall accuracy of 97% for the RNF43 mutation calls made by software. To replicate these results, the authors reanalyzed 222 colorectal cancer cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas.[9] RNF43 mutations were present reliably in 17.6% of cases, and 49 cases were from the initial publication. The discrepancy between these results and previously published analyses of the TCGA data set may be attributable to newer algorithms in the detection of significant insertion and deletion events, which continue to be an ongoing challenge in their accuracy compared with single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Under prior methodologies, many true mutations at microsatellite sites were falsely discarded as errors due to their resemblance to sequencing artifacts caused by polymerase slippage during the exome enrichment step. Consistent with the importance of this RNF43 in the serrated pathway, these mutations were particularly enriched in those tumors with MSI-H status, occurring in ~80% of this subset of colorectal cancers (P<2.2 × 10−16, Fisher's exact test). Complementary to our initial microarray comparisons of sporadic polyps from the serrated and conventional pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis, somatic RNF43 mutations appeared mutually exclusive with deleterious APC mutations. The results from these studies have clinical consequences for epidemiology, genetic testing, and treatment strategies. First, these mutations provide firm genetic support for the multiple cancer risks observed in families and first-degree relatives of those afflicted with serrated polyposis. Many of the genes found in the primary mechanisms of OIS contain tumor-suppressor genes with already established pleiotropic effects. The discoveries of germline and somatic RNF43 mutations in serrated lesions provide additional genetic evidence of such pleiotropy as the gene is found frequently mutated in gastric, pancreatic, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. The germline mechanisms disrupted in serrated polyposis patients and the somatic mutations found in sporadic MSI-H tumors should promote clinical trials of newly developed chemotherapeutics for sporadic serrated colorectal tumors. Clinical trials of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have demonstrated promise in individuals with germline mutations in upstream DNA damage repair pathways, notably those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, for individuals with breast or ovarian cancers.[10, 11] Such agents push tumor cells with deficiencies in DNA repair pathways into mitotic catastrophe with the accumulation of double-stranded DNA breaks. The presence of germline and somatic RNF43 mutations also confers the possibility of using an additional class of therapeutic agents. Recently, porcupine inhibitors, a new class of drugs that impair Wnt secretion, have demonstrated efficacy in slowing the tumor growth of pancreatic cancer cell lines that harbor deleterious somatic RNF43 mutations.[12] Despite the initial focus upon epigenetics due to the observed CIMP-high phenotype, the genetics of serrated neoplasia have a critical role in determining disease risk and therapeutic strategies. Additional experiments with larger cohorts of serrated polyposis will likely reveal additional high-risk genes given the broad genetic heterogeneity evident, leading to discovery of additional novel targets. In contrast to other tumor types with hypermethylation, the search for the inciting somatic mechanisms that trigger the widespread epigenetic changes observed in these cancers remains uncertain. These efforts over the upcoming years have the potential to further change preventative and therapeutic approaches toward colon cancer.
  12 in total

1.  Cancer risks for the relatives of colorectal cancer cases with a methylated MLH1 promoter region: data from the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  A Joan Levine; Aung Ko Win; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark A Jenkins; John A Baron; Joanne P Young; Tiffany I Long; Daniel J Weisenberger; Peter W Laird; Rebecca L McCall; David J Duggan; Robert W Haile
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-12-05

2.  Germline mutations in oncogene-induced senescence pathways are associated with multiple sessile serrated adenomas.

Authors:  Manish K Gala; Yusuke Mizukami; Long P Le; Kentaro Moriichi; Thomas Austin; Masayoshi Yamamoto; Gregory Y Lauwers; Nabeel Bardeesy; Daniel C Chung
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  RNF43 is frequently mutated in colorectal and endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Marios Giannakis; Eran Hodis; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Mai Yamauchi; Joseph Rosenbluh; Kristian Cibulskis; Gordon Saksena; Michael S Lawrence; Zhi Rong Qian; Reiko Nishihara; Eliezer M Van Allen; William C Hahn; Stacey B Gabriel; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz; Shuji Ogino; Charles S Fuchs; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Ink4a/Arf and oncogene-induced senescence prevent tumor progression during alternative colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Moritz Bennecke; Lydia Kriegl; Monther Bajbouj; Kristin Retzlaff; Sylvie Robine; Andreas Jung; Melek C Arkan; Thomas Kirchner; Florian R Greten
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial.

Authors:  Andrew Tutt; Mark Robson; Judy E Garber; Susan M Domchek; M William Audeh; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Michael Friedlander; Banu Arun; Niklas Loman; Rita K Schmutzler; Andrew Wardley; Gillian Mitchell; Helena Earl; Mark Wickens; James Carmichael
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Cancer risks for relatives of patients with serrated polyposis.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; Rhiannon J Walters; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark A Jenkins; Kevin Sweet; Wendy L Frankel; Albert de la Chapelle; Diane M McKeone; Michael D Walsh; Mark Clendenning; Sally-Ann Pearson; Erika Pavluk; Belinda Nagler; John L Hopper; Michael R Gattas; Jack Goldblatt; Jill George; Graeme K Suthers; Kerry D Phillips; Sonja Woodall; Julie Arnold; Kathy Tucker; Michael Field; Sian Greening; Steve Gallinger; Melyssa Aronson; Renee Perrier; Michael O Woods; Jane S Green; Neal Walker; Christophe Rosty; Susan Parry; Joanne P Young
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  V600EBraf induces gastrointestinal crypt senescence and promotes tumour progression through enhanced CpG methylation of p16INK4a.

Authors:  Linda A S Carragher; Kimberley R Snell; Susan M Giblett; Victoria S S Aldridge; Bipin Patel; Simon J Cook; Doug J Winton; Richard Marais; Catrin A Pritchard
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 12.137

9.  Microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation testing in colorectal cancer prognostication.

Authors:  Paul Lochhead; Aya Kuchiba; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Mai Yamauchi; Reiko Nishihara; Zhi Rong Qian; Teppei Morikawa; Jeanne Shen; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A genetic progression model of Braf(V600E)-induced intestinal tumorigenesis reveals targets for therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Roland Rad; Juan Cadiñanos; Lena Rad; Ignacio Varela; Alexander Strong; Lydia Kriegl; Fernando Constantino-Casas; Stefan Eser; Maren Hieber; Barbara Seidler; Stacey Price; Mario F Fraga; Vincenzo Calvanese; Gary Hoffman; Hannes Ponstingl; Günter Schneider; Kosuke Yusa; Carolyn Grove; Roland M Schmid; Wei Wang; George Vassiliou; Thomas Kirchner; Ultan McDermott; Pentao Liu; Dieter Saur; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 31.743

View more
  9 in total

1.  Somatic targeted mutation profiling of colorectal cancer precursor lesions.

Authors:  Wellington Dos Santos; Mariana Bisarro Dos Reis; Jun Porto; Ana Carolina de Carvalho; Marcus Matsushita; Gabriela Oliveira; Kari Syrjänen; Rui Manuel Reis; Denise Peixoto Guimarães
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.622

2.  MLH1, BRAF and p53 - searching for significant markers to predict evolution towards adenocarcinoma in colonic sessile serrated lesions.

Authors:  Diana Răduţă; Octavian Marius Dincă; Gianina Viorica Micu; Luciana Nichita; Mirela Daniela Cioplea; Radu Mihai Buşcă; Raluca Ardeleanu; Radu Bogdan Mateescu; Andreea Benguş; Sabina Andrada Zurac; Cristiana Gabriela Popp; George Cristian Vlădan
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.833

Review 3.  Berberine as a Potential Agent for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Xi Jiang; Zhongxiu Jiang; Min Jiang; Yan Sun
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 4.  Functional significance and therapeutic implication of ring-type E3 ligases in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L Liu; C C Wong; B Gong; J Yu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Fusobacterium nucleatum in Colorectal Carcinoma Tissue According to Tumor Location.

Authors:  Kosuke Mima; Yin Cao; Andrew T Chan; Zhi Rong Qian; Jonathan A Nowak; Yohei Masugi; Yan Shi; Mingyang Song; Annacarolina da Silva; Mancang Gu; Wanwan Li; Tsuyoshi Hamada; Keisuke Kosumi; Akiko Hanyuda; Li Liu; Aleksandar D Kostic; Marios Giannakis; Susan Bullman; Caitlin A Brennan; Danny A Milner; Hideo Baba; Levi A Garraway; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Wendy S Garrett; Curtis Huttenhower; Matthew Meyerson; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Reiko Nishihara; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 6.  Aspirin for prevention of colorectal cancer in the elderly: friend or foe?

Authors:  Abhilash Perisetti; Hemant Goyal; Benjamin Tharian; Sumant Inamdar; Jawahar L Mehta
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-20

Review 7.  Linking Gut Microbiota to Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hans Raskov; Jakob Burcharth; Hans-Christian Pommergaard
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Circulating nucleosomes as new blood-based biomarkers for detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jean-François Rahier; Anne Druez; Laurence Faugeras; Jean-Paul Martinet; Myriam Géhénot; Eléonore Josseaux; Marielle Herzog; Jake Micallef; Fabienne George; Monique Delos; Thierry De Ronde; Abdenor Badaoui; Lionel D'Hondt
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 9.  Effects of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastrointestinal tract malignant diseases: From the oral cavity to rectum.

Authors:  Yang-Che Kuo; Lo-Yip Yu; Horng-Yuan Wang; Ming-Jen Chen; Ming-Shiang Wu; Chun-Jen Liu; Ying-Chun Lin; Shou-Chuan Shih; Kuang-Chun Hu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-01-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.