Literature DB >> 28733803

Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Anahita H Mehta1, Andrew J Oxenham2.   

Abstract

Pitch plays a crucial role in speech and music, but is highly degraded for people with cochlear implants, leading to severe communication challenges in noisy environments. Pitch is determined primarily by the first few spectrally resolved harmonics of a tone. In implants, access to this pitch is limited by poor spectral resolution, due to the limited number of channels and interactions between adjacent channels. Here we used noise-vocoder simulations to explore how many channels, and how little channel interaction, are required to elicit pitch. Results suggest that two to four times the number of channels are needed, along with interactions reduced by an order of magnitude, than available in current devices. These new constraints not only provide insights into the basic mechanisms of pitch coding in normal hearing but also suggest that spectrally based complex pitch is unlikely to be generated in implant users without significant changes in the method or site of stimulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implants; melody discrimination; pitch; vocoder

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28733803      PMCID: PMC5688042          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0632-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  63 in total

1.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  S Rosen; A Faulkner; L Wilkinson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pitch related to spectral edges of broadband signals.

Authors:  A Kohlrausch; A J Houtsma
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  R J Ritsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; J Fitzke; Z Tu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding.

Authors:  Stuart Rosen; Pamela Souza; Caroline Ekelund; Arooj A Majeed
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  The role of pitch and harmonic cancellation when listening to speech in harmonic background sounds.

Authors:  Daniel R Guest; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fundamental-frequency discrimination based on temporal-envelope cues: Effects of bandwidth and interference.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

5.  Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals.

Authors:  Martin J Lindenbeck; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Cochlear tuning and the peripheral representation of harmonic sounds in mammals.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.389

8.  No Benefit of Deriving Cochlear-Implant Maps From Binaural Temporal-Envelope Sensitivity for Speech Perception or Spatial Hearing Under Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Coral E Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Rate and Temporal Coding of Regular and Irregular Pulse Trains in Auditory Midbrain of Normal-Hearing and Cochlear-Implanted Rabbits.

Authors:  Yaqing Su; Yoojin Chung; Dan F M Goodman; Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-23

10.  Channel Interaction During Infrared Light Stimulation in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Aditi Agarwal; Xiaodong Tan; Yingyue Xu; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.