Literature DB >> 24606275

Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre.

Emily J Allen1, Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

Variations in the spectral shape of harmonic tone complexes are perceived as timbre changes and can lead to poorer fundamental frequency (F0) or pitch discrimination. Less is known about the effects of F0 variations on spectral shape discrimination. The aims of the study were to determine whether the interactions between pitch and timbre are symmetric, and to test whether musical training affects listeners' ability to ignore variations in irrelevant perceptual dimensions. Difference limens (DLs) for F0 were measured with and without random, concurrent, variations in spectral centroid, and vice versa. Additionally, sensitivity was measured as the target parameter and the interfering parameter varied by the same amount, in terms of individual DLs. Results showed significant and similar interference between pitch (F0) and timbre (spectral centroid) dimensions, with upward spectral motion often confused for upward F0 motion, and vice versa. Musicians had better F0DLs than non-musicians on average, but similar spectral centroid DLs. Both groups showed similar interference effects, in terms of decreased sensitivity, in both dimensions. Results reveal symmetry in the interference effects between pitch and timbre, once differences in sensitivity between dimensions and subjects are controlled. Musical training does not reliably help to overcome these effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606275      PMCID: PMC3985978          DOI: 10.1121/1.4863269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Influence of tonal context and timbral variation on perception of pitch.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

2.  Informational masking and musical training.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Brian J Fligor; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Alain de Cheveigné; Stephen McAdams; Suzanne Winsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Independence and separability in the perception of complex nonspeech sounds.

Authors:  Noah H Silbert; James T Townsend; Jennifer J Lentz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres.

Authors:  J M Grey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch discrimination of harmonic complex signals: residue pitch or multiple component discriminations?

Authors:  A Faulkner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Pitch perception beyond the traditional existence region of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Adam Loper; Sébastien Santurette
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  26 in total

1.  Encoding of natural timbre dimensions in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Michelle Moerel; Agustín Lage-Castellanos; Federico De Martino; Elia Formisano; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Cortical Correlates of Attention to Auditory Features.

Authors:  Emily J Allen; Philip C Burton; Juraj Mesik; Cheryl A Olman; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

4.  Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Samara Soslowsky; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30

5.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Symmetric Electrode Spanning Narrows the Excitation Patterns of Partial Tripolar Stimuli in Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Ching-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25

7.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

8.  Effect of lowest harmonic rank on fundamental-frequency difference limens varies with fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Short- and long-term memory for pitch and non-pitch contours: Insights from congenital amusia.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Agathe Pralus; Lesly Fornoni; Andrew J Oxenham; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.