Literature DB >> 31153349

The role of pitch and harmonic cancellation when listening to speech in harmonic background sounds.

Daniel R Guest1, Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

Fundamental frequency differences (ΔF0) between competing talkers aid in the perceptual segregation of the talkers (ΔF0 benefit), but the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. A model of ΔF0 benefit based on harmonic cancellation proposes that a masker's periodicity can be used to cancel (i.e., filter out) its neural representation. Earlier work suggested that an octave ΔF0 provided little benefit, an effect predicted by harmonic cancellation due to the shared periodicity of masker and target. Alternatively, this effect can be explained by spectral overlap between the harmonic components of the target and masker. To assess these competing explanations, speech intelligibility of a monotonized target talker, masked by a speech-shaped harmonic complex tone, was measured as a function of ΔF0, masker spectrum (all harmonics or odd harmonics only), and masker temporal envelope (amplitude modulated or unmodulated). Removal of the masker's even harmonics when the target was one octave above the masker improved speech reception thresholds by about 5 dB. Because this manipulation eliminated spectral overlap between target and masker components but preserved shared periodicity, the finding is consistent with the explanation for the lack of ΔF0 benefit at the octave based on spectral overlap, but not with the explanation based on harmonic cancellation.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31153349      PMCID: PMC6529328          DOI: 10.1121/1.5102169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

1.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?

Authors:  Joshua G Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng; Ruth Litovsky; Peter Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of envelope-vocoder processing on F0 discrimination and concurrent-vowel identification.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Detection and F0 discrimination of harmonic complex tones in the presence of competing tones or noise.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Identification of frequency-shifted vowels.

Authors:  Peter F Assmann; Terrance M Nearey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations.

Authors:  Carlo K Berenstein; Lucas H M Mens; Jef J S Mulder; Filiep J Vanpoucke
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  R Meddis; M J Hewitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  A harmonic-cancellation-based model to predict speech intelligibility against a harmonic masker.

Authors:  Luna Prud'homme; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech in noise perception improved by training fine auditory discrimination: far and applicable transfer of perceptual learning.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Tingting Yan; Ting Huang; Xiaoli Li; Yu-Xuan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.