Literature DB >> 30522318

Fundamental-frequency discrimination based on temporal-envelope cues: Effects of bandwidth and interference.

Anahita H Mehta1, Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

Both music and speech perception rely on hearing out one pitch in the presence of others. Pitch discrimination of narrowband sounds based only on temporal-envelope cues is rendered nearly impossible by introducing interferers in both normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant (CI) users. This study tested whether performance improves in normal-hearing listeners if the target is presented over a broad spectral region. The results indicate that performance is still strongly affected by spectrally remote interferers, despite increases in bandwidth, suggesting that envelope-based pitch is unlikely to allow CI users to perceive pitch when multiple harmonic sounds are presented at once.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30522318      PMCID: PMC6249132          DOI: 10.1121/1.5079569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Exploring the temporal mechanism involved in the pitch of unresolved harmonics.

Authors:  C Kaernbach; C Bering
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?

Authors:  Joshua G Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

4.  Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; David A Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30

5.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Masker asynchrony impairs the fundamental-frequency discrimination of unresolved harmonics.

Authors:  R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Long; John M Deeks; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-10

9.  Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise.

Authors:  Dorea R Ruggles; Richard L Freyman; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds.

Authors:  Sara M K Madsen; Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

2.  Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Andres Camarena; Susan R S Bissmeyer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.672

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.