Literature DB >> 33476051

Channel Interaction During Infrared Light Stimulation in the Cochlea.

Aditi Agarwal1, Xiaodong Tan1, Yingyue Xu1, Claus-Peter Richter1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of perceptually independent channels to encode acoustic information is limited in contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) because of the current spread in the tissue. It has been suggested that neighboring electrodes have to be separated in humans by a distance of more than 2 mm to eliminate significant overlap of the electric current fields and subsequent interaction between the channels. It has also been argued that an increase in the number of independent channels could improve CI user performance in challenging listening environments, such as speech in noise, tonal languages, or music perception. Optical stimulation has been suggested as an alternative modality for neural stimulation because it is spatially selective. This study reports the results of experiments designed to quantify the interaction between neighboring optical sources in the cochlea during stimulation with infrared radiation. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In seven adult albino guinea pigs, a forward masking method was used to quantify the interaction between two neighboring optical sources during stimulation. Two optical fibers were placed through cochleostomies into the scala tympani of the basal cochlear turn. The radiation beams were directed towards different neuron populations along the spiral ganglion. Optically evoked compound action potentials were recorded for different radiant energies and distances between the optical fibers. The outcome measure was the radiant energy of a masker pulse delivered 3 milliseconds before a probe pulse to reduce the response evoked by the probe pulse by 3 dB. Results were compared for different distances between the fibers placed along the cochlea.
RESULTS: The energy required to reduce the probe's response by 3 dB increased by 20.4 dB/mm and by 26.0 dB/octave. The inhibition was symmetrical for the masker placed basal to the probe (base-to-apex) and the masker placed apical to the probe (apex-to-base).
CONCLUSION: The interaction between neighboring optical sources during infrared laser stimulation is less than the interaction between neighboring electrical contacts during electrical stimulation. Previously published data for electrical stimulation reported an average current spread in human and cat cochleae of 2.8 dB/mm. With the increased number of independent channels for optical stimulation, it is anticipated that speech and music performance will improve. Lasers Surg. Med.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  channel interaction; cochlear implant; hearing; infrared stimulation; laser

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33476051      PMCID: PMC8787864          DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092


  57 in total

1.  The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  B A Henry; C M McKay; H J McDermott; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic events and "optophonic" cochlear responses induced by pulsed near-infrared laser.

Authors:  Ingo Ulrik Teudt; Hannes Maier; Claus-Peter Richter; Andrej Kral
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

4.  Within-channel gap detection using dissimilar markers in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recognizing the journey and celebrating the achievement of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Barbara Canlon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

Review 8.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Challenges for the application of optical stimulation in the cochlea for the study and treatment of hearing loss.

Authors:  Rachael T Richardson; Alexander C Thompson; Andrew K Wise; Karina Needham
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.388

10.  Nanosecond laser pulse stimulation of the inner ear-a wavelength study.

Authors:  Michael Schultz; Peter Baumhoff; Hannes Maier; Ingo U Teudt; Alexander Krüger; Thomas Lenarz; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.