Literature DB >> 32048077

The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Anahita H Mehta1, Hao Lu2, Andrew J Oxenham2.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) listeners typically perform poorly on tasks involving the pitch of complex tones. This limitation in performance is thought to be mainly due to the restricted number of active channels and the broad current spread that leads to channel interactions and subsequent loss of precise spectral information, with temporal information limited primarily to temporal-envelope cues. Little is known about the degree of spectral resolution required to perceive combinations of multiple pitches, or a single pitch in the presence of other interfering tones in the same spectral region. This study used noise-excited envelope vocoders that simulate the limited resolution of CIs to explore the perception of multiple pitches presented simultaneously. The results show that the resolution required for perceiving multiple complex pitches is comparable to that found in a previous study using single complex tones. Although relatively high performance can be achieved with 48 channels, performance remained near chance when even limited spectral spread (with filter slopes as steep as 144 dB/octave) was introduced to the simulations. Overall, these tight constraints suggest that current CI technology will not be able to convey the pitches of combinations of spectrally overlapping complex tones.

Keywords:  cochlear implants; complex pitch; vocoder

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32048077      PMCID: PMC7062949          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-019-00738-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  61 in total

1.  Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Fundamental-frequency discrimination based on temporal-envelope cues: Effects of bandwidth and interference.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

5.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Jeremy Marozeau; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Hugh McDermott; Colette McKay; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-30

9.  Improved Auditory Nerve Survival with Nanoengineered Supraparticles for Neurotrophin Delivery into the Deafened Cochlea.

Authors:  Andrew K Wise; Justin Tan; Yajun Wang; Frank Caruso; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Qing Tang; Thomas Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Lexical Effects on the Perceived Clarity of Noise-Vocoded Speech in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Victoria A Sevich; Emily M Clausing; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  Channel Interaction During Infrared Light Stimulation in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Aditi Agarwal; Xiaodong Tan; Yingyue Xu; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-01-21

3.  Listening to speech with a guinea pig-to-human brain-to-brain interface.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Richter; Petrina La Faire; Xiaodong Tan; Pamela Fiebig; David M Landsberger; Alan G Micco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.