Kentaro Kikuchi1, Harumi Inoue1, Yuji Miyazaki1, Fumio Ide1, Masaru Kojima2, Kaoru Kusama1. 1. Division of Pathology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Sciences, Meikai University School of Dentistry, 1-1 Keyakidai, Sakado, Saitama 350-0283, Japan. 2. Department of Anatomic and Diagnostic Pathology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Oaza-kitakobayashi, Mibu-machi, Shimotsuga-gun, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan.
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is known to be associated with the development of malignant lymphoma and lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) in immunocompromised patients. EBV, a B-lymphotropic gamma-herpesvirus, causes infectious mononucleosis and oral hairy leukoplakia, as well as various pathological types of lymphoid malignancy. Furthermore, EBV is associated with epithelial malignancies such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), salivary gland tumor, gastric carcinoma and breast carcinoma. In terms of oral disease, there have been several reports of EBV-related oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) worldwide. However, the role of EBV in tumorigenesis of human oral epithelial or lymphoid tissue is unclear. This review summarizes EBV-related epithelial and non-epithelial tumors or tumor-like lesions of the oral cavity. In addition, we describe EBV latent genes and their expression in normal epithelium, inflamed gingiva, epithelial dysplasia and SCC, as well as considering LPDs (MTX- and age-related) and DLBCLs of the oral cavity.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is known to be associated with the development of malignant lymphoma and lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) in immunocompromised patients. EBV, a B-lymphotropic gamma-herpesvirus, causes infectious mononucleosis and oral hairy leukoplakia, as well as various pathological types of lymphoid malignancy. Furthermore, EBV is associated with epithelial malignancies such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), salivary gland tumor, gastric carcinoma and breast carcinoma. In terms of oral disease, there have been several reports of EBV-related oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) worldwide. However, the role of EBV in tumorigenesis of human oral epithelial or lymphoid tissue is unclear. This review summarizes EBV-related epithelial and non-epithelial tumors or tumor-like lesions of the oral cavity. In addition, we describe EBV latent genes and their expression in normal epithelium, inflamed gingiva, epithelial dysplasia and SCC, as well as considering LPDs (MTX- and age-related) and DLBCLs of the oral cavity.
Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) was first isolated by Epstein et al. [1] in 1964 from cultured cells of Burkitt’s lymphoma frequently found in children of equatorial Africa. EBV, human herpes virus-4 (HHV-4), is classified as one of the γ herpes subfamily of the HHVs [2]. It is a double-stranded DNA virus of about 170 kb, and encodes about 80 genes. EBV-determined nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1) is required for self-replication of the virus [3], [4], [5], and EBNA-2 and latent infection membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) are associated with immortalization of infectious cells in vitro
[6], [7], [8]. EBV occurs almost universally, and about 90–95% of adults throughout the world become infected, usually in childhood or early adolescence [9], [10]. The oral cavity and pharyngolarynx is the main portal through which environmental pathogenes enter the human body. The oral cavity is located close to Waldeyer’s ring, which is rich in lymphoid tissue. Although EBV has been known to infect B cells of the pharyngeal tonsils via saliva, it has been shown that EBV also infects other cell types, including epithelial cells [2], [11]. Despite the close association of EBV with a range of lymphoid and epithelial malignancies, the virus does not cause major symptoms in the majority of lifelong carriers with EBV-infected memory B lymphocytes [12], [13]. The role of EBV in transformation in humanmalignancies remains unclear, particularly in epithelial cancer. EBV gene expression alters the biological properties of the infected cells in both latent and lytic infections, and may result in the development of cancer in humans [14]. EBV is associated with a variety of malignant lymphomas, such as Burkitt’s, Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in immunodeficiency, and lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the parotid gland, as well as epithelial malignancy of the thyroid, lung, nasopharynx, and stomach [10], [15], [16], [17], [18] (Fig. 1). Moreover, EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (EBV-LPDs) are known to occur through EBV reactivation due to decreased immunity of the host in situations such as infectious diseases [19], organ transplantation [20], drug use [21] and aging [22]. In fact, we have previously reported EBV-associated B-cell LPDs arising in the oral cavity [23], [24]. Various EBV-associated epithelial carcinomas such as those of the nasopharynx [25], stomach [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], salivary gland [33], [34], [35], breast [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], bladder [44], kidney [45], uterine cervix [46], colon [47], and lung [48] have been described. Most oral carcinomas are squamous cell carcinomas that originate from outgrowth of the mucosal epithelium. The reported rate of positivity for latent EBV genes in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has varied from 15% to 70% [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59]. Although there have been many reports on the association of EBV with OSCCs or LPDs in the oral cavity, the role of EBV in carcinogenesis and cancer development remains unclear. The recently reported EBV-associated epithelial and non-epithelial malignancies, OSCCs and LPDs, are herein reviewed.
Figure 1
Human tumor associated EBV is related to a wide range of human epithelial and non-epithelial malignancies.
Humantumor associated EBV is related to a wide range of human epithelial and non-epithelial malignancies.
Interaction of EBV with host cell surface receptors and cell entry
Cell entry is a fundamental part of the infectivity process for any virus, and cell surface receptors are the critical molecules for target cell recognition determining cell tropism and species specificity [60], [61], [62] (Table 1). The EBV double-stranded linear DNA genome is packed inside a capsid which is surrounded by a tegument. This is further enclosed by a lipid envelope consisting of several conserved glycoproteins. These glycoproteins play important roles during initial attachment and subsequent viral entry through interaction with specific host cell surface receptors mediating micropinocytosis [62], [63] and lipid raft-dependent endocytosis [62], [63], [64]. The initial phase of EBV attachment to the cell surface of B cells occur via the viral envelope glycoprotein gp350/gp220, which interacts with the cellular receptor CD21 [65], and also with CD35 as an alternative EBV attachment receptor in certain CD21-negative cells [66]. EBV glycoprotein gp350 (or gp220) binds to CD21 (or CD35) inducing endocytosis, and the EBV is then captured by the B cell [67]. Interaction with B lymphocyte virus glycoprotein gB and a 3-part complex of glycoproteins, gH/gL/gp42, and human leukocyte antigen class II (HLA class II) eventually triggers fusion of the virus with the endosomal membrane, allowing entry of the tegumented capsid into the cytoplasm [68]. On the other hand, in epithelial cells, direct interaction between EBV gH/gL and integrins ɑvβ6 and ɑvβ8 can provide the trigger for fusion of EBV with an epithelial cell [69]. In addition, the EBV transmembrane envelope glycoprotein BMRF2 has been shown to interact with intwgrins β1 and ɑ5 on oral epithelial cells, but not on B cells [70], [71]. Recently it has been reported that in nasopharyngeal epithelial cells, neuropilin 1 (NRP1) interacts with EBV gB and promotes EBV infection of epithelial cells by coordinating the receptor tyrosin kinase (RTK) signaling pathway and macropinocytic events [72].
Table 1
EBV glycoproteins and host cell surface receptors.
Infected cell types of EBV
EBV glycoproteins [Gene name]
Role in virus entry
Attachment receptors/uptake or co-receptor
Uptake mechanism
B cells
gp350 [BLLF1]
Attachment to B-cell
CD21 (CR2)CD35(CR1)
Macropinocytosis and lipid raft-dependent endocytosis
gp42 [BZLF]
Attachment to B-cell
HLA class II
Membrane fusion
gp25 (gL) [BKRF2]
Chaperon for gH
Unknown
gp110 (gB) [BALF4]
Membrane fusion
Unknown
epithelial cells (oropharyngial)
gp85 (gH) (BDLF3)
Attachment to epithelial cells
Integrin β1, ɑ5
Lipid raft-dependent endocytosis
Membrane fusion
BMRF2 (BMRF2)
Attachment to epithelial cells
Integrin ɑvβ6, ɑvβ8
gp25 (gL) [BKRF2]
Chaperon for gH
Unknown
gp110 (gB) [BALF4]
Membrane fusion
NRP1
EBV glycoproteins and host cell surface receptors.
Gene expression patterns in EBV latency
EBV shows primary tropism for B cells and epithelial cells, but can also infect NK, T and smooth muscle cells, with the ability to cause oncogenesis in all of these cell types [73]. EBV infection in epithelial cells exhibits an expression program distinct from that of B cells [74], [75]. EBV infection of primary B cells initiates a robust growth and proliferation program in which type III latency genes are expressed, including non-coding RNAs (EBV-encoded small RNA: EBERs), six nuclear proteins (EBNA1, 2, 3A, 3B, 3C and EBNA-LP) and three membrane proteins (LMP-1, 2A and 2B) [76]. In contrast, EBV infection dose not induce clonal expression in primary epithelial cells [77]. EBNA-LP, EBNA2 and EBNA3C, which play a crucial role in B cell immortalization and cell cycle progression, are not expressed in infected epithelial cells. A more restricted group of latent genes (type II latency) are expressed, including EBNA1, LMP1, LMP2A and EBERs [12], [77], [78], [79]. Notably, high level of BamHI A rightward transcripts (BARTs) are expressed in both nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric cancer, suggesting their involvement in epithelial malignancies [79], [80], [81]. EBV has a biphasic life cycle with two stages. The lytic cycle allows EBV to productively infect new cells and new hosts, whereas the latency cycle is vital to allow persistence of the virus within infected cells. Latency can be further divided into four types (Table 2) with restricted viral gene expression to avoid immune surveillance. Viral gene expression changes when EBV enters the lytic cycle [74], [75], [76].
Table 2
Gene expression pattern in EBV latency.
Types
EBERs
EBNA1
LMP1, 2
EBNA2, 3, LP
Examples (related disease)
Latency III
+
+
+
+
Transformed B cells in vitro (lymphoblastoid cell line; LCL)
Immunosuppressive drug induced with collagen disease (Methotrexate-associated or antanonists of TNFɑ)
Age-related (elderly patients without history of tumor/autoimmune disease)
Latency II
+
+
+
Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Extranodal T/NK cell lymphoma
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, nasal type
Aggressive NK cell leukemia
Pyothorax-associated lymphoma
Lymphomatoid granulomatosis
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Latency I
+
+
Burkitt’s lymphoma
Gastric carcinoma
Latency 0
+
Resting memory B cell (Healthy carriers)
Gene expression pattern in EBV latency.Primary immune disorders (X-linked, etc.)HIV infection (AIDS)Post-transplantImmunosuppressive drug induced with collagen disease (Methotrexate-associated or antanonists of TNFɑ)Age-related (elderly patients without history of tumor/autoimmune disease)
Roles of EBV-encoded latent genes in carcinogenesis
The oncogenic capacity and properties of EBV are recognized through its in vitro transforming effects. Following infection of primary human B cells in vitro, EBV induces their proliferation resulting in the development of lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). The genes of six EBV nucler antigens (EBNA1, 2, 3A, 3B, 3C and EBNA-LP) as well as three latent membrane proteins (LMP-1, 2A and 2B) are expressed in these cells. Likewise, these proteins are expressed in the early phases of natural infection [82], [83]. EBNA2 is regarded as the central transcription factor for both viral and cellular gene expression. It is responsible for B cell proliferation and expressed in LCLs [84]. LMP-1 expression, in turn, is regulated by EBNA2 and serves as an active receptor for tumor necrosis factor (TNF-ɑ), which is essential for apoptosis [85]. LMP-1 has also been reported to signal in the B cell similarly to CD40- CD40 ligand interaction, showing functional properties similar to those of activated CD40 [86]. However, in the absence of EBNA2 in EBV-proliferating B lymphocytes, CD40 activation and LMP1 expression confer a similar phenotypic characteristic, i.e. the continuous survival of the cell [87]. Interestingly, however, both CD40 activation and LMP1 expression also prevent apoptosis of B cells [88], [89]. Additionally, experiments with transgenic mice have revealed that LMP1 mimics CD40 signaling for B-cell differentiation during natural infection [90]. The roles of different EBV-encoded latent genes in tumor formation have been confirmed [91], [92] and these are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3
Roles of EBV-encoded latent genes in oncogenesis [91], [92].
Latent genes
Role of latent genes
EBNA-1
Transactivator of viral latent genes and host genes; responsible for episome replication, segregation and persistence of viral genome; involved in p53 degradation and oncogenesis.
EBNA-LP
Transcriptional co-activator of EBNA-2-dependent viral and cellular gene transcription; It is essential for EBV-mediated B-cell transformation.
EBNA-2
Activates viral and cellular gene transcription for transformation. It is critical for EBV-mediated B-cell transformation.
EBNA-3A
A co-activator of EBNA-2, downregulate c-Myc transcription and block EBNA-2 activation effects; and induce CDKN2 and chemokines. It is essential for EBV-mediated B-cell transformation.
EBNA-3B
A co-activator of EBNA-2; dispensable for B-cell transformation; viral tumor suppressor; and up regulates CXCL10. EBNA-3B-knockout induces DLBCL-like tumors.
EBNA-3C
Co-activaters with EBNA-2 host CXCR4 and CXCL12; overcomes EBV-infection-mediated DNA damage response; promotes cell proliferation; induces G1 arrests; It is essential for EBV-mediated B-cell transformation.
LMP-1
Mimics the consistutively active form of CD40, activates NF-κB, JNK and p38 pathways; is critical for EBV-mediated B-cell transformation, a major EBV-encoded oncogene; activates NF-κB, JNK and p38 pathways; and induces EMT of NPC and acquisition of cancer stem cell-like properties.
LMP-2A
Mimics constitutively active, antigen-independent BCR signaling through constitutive activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway224; blocks antigen-dependent BCR signaling; induces B-cell lymphoma in transgenic condition; it is important but not essential for in vitro primary B-lymphocyte growth transformation; rescues the LMP-1-generated impairment in germinal center in the response to antigen in animals; confers resting B cells sensitive to NF-κB inhibition and apoptosis; suppresses differentiation and promots epithelial cell spreading and motility in epithelial cells; and enriches cancer stem cell-like population.
EBER
Most abundant EBV-encoded non-coding RNAs; augments colony formation and induces growth; confers cells resistance to PKR-dependent apoptosis; induces cytokines and modulates innate immune response; binds to La, PKR, L22, PRR and RIG-I; and EBER-mediated RIG-I activation likely contributes to EBV oncogenesis. EBER blockades of PKR-mediated phosphorylation of eIF2ɑ results in blockage of eIF2ɑ-mediated inhibition of protein synthesis and resistance to IFNɑ-induced apoptosis.
miRNAs
Has a role sustaining latently infected cells. BHRF1 miRNA and BART miRNAs interfere with apoptosis.
Roles of EBV-encoded latent genes in oncogenesis [91], [92].
Detection of EBV gene and latent infection gene expression in normal epithelia, epithelial dysplasia, and OSCC of the oral cavity
Detection of EBV genes by PCR
Previous reports have indicated that the average rate of detection of EBNA-2 in OSCC tissue by PCR is about 42.8% [49], [50], [51], [52]. This is similar to the rate (52.0%) we found in 150 cases of OSCC (Fig. 2), but the rate of LMP-1 detection by PCR was low. The rate of detection of EBV genes in OSCC (EBNA-2: 52.0%, LMP-1: 10.7%) tends to be low in comparison with NPC (EBNA-2: 66.7%, LMP-1: 33.3%) [93]. It has been reported that the positivity rate for EBNA-2 and LMP-1 in Japan is 70% in Okinawa (in the south) and 30% in Hokkaido (in the north) [52], [53]. Some authors have reported that LMP-1 is detectable vy PCR in 95.6% of NPC tissues, whereas it was not detectable in OSCC, pharyngeal carcinoma or tonsil tissue [94]. Moreover, Horiuchi et al. have reported that EBV infection in OSCCs was detected in 52.8% of cases by PCR and that EBER was detected 27.5% of cases by in-situ hybridization (ISH), whereas LMP-1 was not detectable [54]. These reports indicated a low level of LMP-1 among the EBV genes in OSCCs. A research group in Thailand has indicated that EBV is not a risk factor for OSCC, as they found that EBER was not detectable in 24 such cases [95]. A more recent PCR study has reported positivity for EBV infection in all of 36 (100%) OSCCs, 7 of 9 (77.8%) pre-cancerous lesions and 1of 12 (8.3%) normal mucosa samples [96]. Furthermore, a research group in Taiwan using EBV genomic microarray (EBV-chip) has reported a high rate of EBV infection (82.5%) in biopsy specimens from 57 cases of OSCC [94]. Using PCR, we have confirmed the presence of EBV latent infection genes in normal epithelia, gingivitis, epithelial dysplasia, and OSCC. The expression of EBV latent infection genes was significantly higher in severe epithelial dysplasia (EBNA-2: 66.7%, LMP-1: 44.4%) than in OSCC (EBNA-2: 52.0%, LMP-1: 10.7%), which is a finding not reported previously. EBV genes were also detectable in normal mucosa (EBNA-2:83.3% and LMP-1:23.3%) and gingivitis (EBNA-2:78.1% and LMP-1:21.9%) [93]. Similarly, it has been reported that the EBV detection rate was 0–7% [49], [55], [56] or 92% [57] in normal oral mucosa, and 19–27% in gingivitis [97], thus supporting our PCR data for non-tumorous lesions. These findings suggest that the oral cavity is an environment that favors latent EBV infection (Figure 3, Figure 4).
Figure 2
Detection of the EBNA-2 genes in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) by PCR.
PCR analysis of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.
The detection rate of EBNA-2 (206 bp) in OSCC specimens was 52.0%. Positive and negative cases are marked red and green, respectively. EBNA-2 bands showed the same level as those in Raji cells used as a positive control.
Figure 3
EBER and LMP-1 expression in OSCCs detected by ISH and IHC.
HE staining (a, d), EBER (b, e), and LMP-1 (c, f). Positive reaction for EBER and LMP-1 shows a similar distribution in OSCC (b, c). Reaction for EBER is weakly positive in SCC, and inflammatory cells are strongly positive in the stroma (e). Reaction for LMP-1 is strongly positive in SCC and inflammatory cells in the stroma (f). (a–c, original magnification, ×12.5, d–f, original magnification, ×200).
Figure 4
Expression of LMP-1 in gingivitis, epithelial dysplasia and OSCC.
LMP-1 expression was greater in severe epithelial dysplasia than in inflamed gingiva, mild to moderate epithelial dysplasia and OSCC. P values were determined by Mann–Whitney U test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Detection of the EBNA-2 genes in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) by PCR.PCR analysis of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.The detection rate of EBNA-2 (206 bp) in OSCC specimens was 52.0%. Positive and negative cases are marked red and green, respectively. EBNA-2 bands showed the same level as those in Raji cells used as a positive control.EBER and LMP-1 expression in OSCCs detected by ISH and IHC.HE staining (a, d), EBER (b, e), and LMP-1 (c, f). Positive reaction for EBER and LMP-1 shows a similar distribution in OSCC (b, c). Reaction for EBER is weakly positive in SCC, and inflammatory cells are strongly positive in the stroma (e). Reaction for LMP-1 is strongly positive in SCC and inflammatory cells in the stroma (f). (a–c, original magnification, ×12.5, d–f, original magnification, ×200).Expression of LMP-1 in gingivitis, epithelial dysplasia and OSCC.LMP-1 expression was greater in severe epithelial dysplasia than in inflamed gingiva, mild to moderate epithelial dysplasia and OSCC. P values were determined by Mann–Whitney U test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).
Detection of EBER by in-situ hybridization (ISH)
As EBER is detected in healthy adults with a history of EBV infection, there is a need for caution with evaluation. In EBV-infected cells EBER is localized primarily in the nucleus, but may also be present in the cytoplasm [98]. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate both of these sites. We found a positive reaction for EBER in the nucleus or cytoplasm in each of the lesions we tested. High-grade EBER expression was more evident in NPC (61.9%) than in SCC (34.7%). Here we newly demonstrated that high-grade EBER expression was significantly more frequent in severe epithelial dysplasia (94.4%) than in OSCC (34.7%), mild to moderate epithelial dysplasia (21.5%), and gingivitis (65.6%) [93]. EBER was highly expressed in severe epithelial dysplasia and was related to carcinogenesis in pre-cancerous tissue. Gene expression indicative of EBV infection is considered to be reduced over time after a cancerous change occurs. In Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines, EBV clones become reduced during long-term passage [3].
Detection of LMP-1 by immunohistochemistry (IHC)
LMP-1 is known to be an oncogene [7], [8] essential for immortalization of B cells developing into B-cell lymphoma in transgenic mice [99], [100]. Furthermore, it has been reported that LMP-1 inhibits the differentiation of human epithelial cells [101], being also related to cancer development, growth, invasion, metastasis and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition [102]. However, there have been few reports of LMP-1 expression in OSCC. Using IHC, Gonzalez-Moles et al. showed that LMP-1 protein was positively expressed in 31 out of 78 (39.7%) OSCCs, 19% of which showed EBV-positivity by PCR [58]. Similarly, Kobayashi et al. found expression of LMP-1 protein in 6 out of 46 (13.0%) OSCCs [51]. In contrast to these reports, Kis et al. [103] and Cruz et al. [104] detected no expression of LMP-1 protein in OSCC. In a recent study, however, high-grade expression of LMP-1 was observed in NPC (52.4%), OSCC (38.7%), severe epithelial dysplasia (72.2%), mild to moderate epithelial dysplasia (6.2%), and gingivitis (6.3%) [93]. Although LMP-1 expression was most commonly seen in NPC, its expression was also significant in OSCC. Of note was that the rate of high-grade LMP-1 expression was higher in severe epithelial dysplasia (72.2%) than in OSCC (38.7%) [93], a new finding that had not been reported previously. It has been reported that LMP-1 expression is related to the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 activation (STAT3) [105], [106]. An important role of LMP-1 expression is activation of STAT3, and also the signaling pathway that includes Janus kinase 3 (JAK3)/STAT3, inhibitor of kappa B kinase (IκB kinase: IKK)/nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/activator protein 1 (AP-1), and MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) [106], [107]. Fang et al. have reported that LMP-1 has a double activation mechanism due to an increase in the NPC cell membrane programmed cell death protein 1 ligand (PD-L1), and induction of PD-L1 in the JAK/STAT pathway through the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) receptor by production of IFN-γ from T-cells [107]. Furthermore, Chen et al. have reported that LMP-1 expression increased the levels of STAT3 and c-MYC protein in NPC cell lines [108]. Expression of LMP-1 in oral precancerous lesions and OSCC suggests the involvement of STAT3 activation in the dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in the oral cavity.
EBV-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) of the oral cavity
MTX- related EBV-associated B cell LPDs
In recent years, reports of EBV-associated B-cell LPD of the oral cavity have increased [23], [24], [109], [110]. EBV associated B-cell LPDs occurring in the oral cavity are often seen as intractable mucosal ulcers (Fig. 5a,b) or as failure of extraction sockets to heal (Fig. 5c,d) [23], [24], [109]. The affected patients are believed to be immunosuppressed, a condition that causes reactivation of EBV. EBV-driven B cell LPDs can be age-related or can occur in patients who are immunosuppressed due to primary immune deficiency, HIV infection, organ transplantation, and treatment with methotrexate (MTX) or tumor necrosis factor-ɑ (TNF-ɑ) antagonist for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [111], [112]. MTX is regarded as an effective immunosuppressive agent for treatment of autoimmune diseases, especially RA, and is therapeutically effective in many cases that are resistant to some anti-rheumatic drugs [113]. Recently, it has been shown that patients with RA and other rheumatic diseases treated with MTX have an increased risk of developing LPDs or lymphomas [114]. Patients with immunodeficiency have a higher risk of LPDs than immunocompetent individuals. Approximately 50% of LPDs are EBV-positive [114]. Overall, approximately 40% of reported cases have involved extranodal sites, including the gastrointestinal tract, skin, lung, kidney, and soft tissues [114], [115], including the oral cavity [23], [109], [110]. Overall, however, approximately 60% of reported cases have shown at least partial regression in response to withdrawal of MTX, the majority being EBV positive cases [114]. The mechanism by which MTX increases the propensity of RApatients for development of lymphomas is not entirely clear. Menke et al. [115] have reported that cell dysregulation as measured by p53 protein expression and EBV-related transformation play important roles in the pathogenesis of lymphomas arising in patients with connective tissue disease who are immunosuppressed with MTX.
Figure 5
Intractable mucosal ulcers or healing failure of extraction sockets.
Buccal ulcer (a) and ongue ulcer (b) in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with MTX. Failure of gingival mucosa (c) and bone (d) healing in a senile patient after tooth extraction [24].
Intractable mucosal ulcers or healing failure of extraction sockets.Buccal ulcer (a) and ongue ulcer (b) in rheumatoid arthritispatients treated with MTX. Failure of gingival mucosa (c) and bone (d) healing in a senile patient after tooth extraction [24].
Age-related EBV-associated B cell LPDs
Age-related EBV-associated B cell LPD is a group of clinicopathologic entities, originally described by Oyama et al. [116], that differs from immunodeficiency-associated LPDs in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification [117], occurring predominantly in elderly patients over the age of 50 years (median age 71 years) and sharing features of EBV-positive B cell neoplasms seen in patients with immunologic impairment despite absence of any predisposing immunodeficiency [116], [118]. Age-related EBV positive B cell LPD may be associated with immune senescence in the elderly, and is now incorporated into the 2008 WHO lymphoma classification as EBV-positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the elderly [119]. Approximately 70% of reported cases of this newly described disease have involved extranodal sites, such as the skin, lung, tonsil and stomach [119], and been characterized by proliferation of atypical large B cells including Hodgkin and Reed–Sternberg-like cells with reactive inflammatory components. Age-related EBV-associated B cell LPD is rare in the oral cavity [24] (Fig. 5c, d).
Roles of LMP-1 protein in B cell lymphomagenesis
The products of viral genes upregulate a variety of cellular antigens and expression of genes in B cells. Key molecular pathways controlling the cell cycle, such as nuclear factor-kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells (NF-κB), are activated and virus-induced cytokines exert paracrine proliferative effects [12], [120], [121], [122]. The major EBV-encoded LMP-1 is an integral membrane protein, which activates signaling pathways such as that involving NF-κB, which increases B-cell survival and facilitates transformation [85], [123], [124], [125], [126] by induction of anti-apoptotic protein. LMP-1 is a 63-kDa integral membrane protein with three domains, and contains two distinct functional regions within its C-terminus, designated C-terminal activating regions 1 and 2 (CTAR1 and CTAR2). The protein also protects cancer cells from apoptosis, by inducing anti-apoptotic proteins, including BCL-2, MCL-1, A20, early growth response transcription factor-1(Egr-1) and SNARK [127], [128], [129]. An in vitro study has shown that EBV-infected cells undergo hypermutation or switching of recombination via up-regulation of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) [130], and EBV-induced AID is also associated with oncogene mutations that contribute to lymphomagenesis [131]. In a mouse bone marrow transplantation model, AID overexpression was reported to promote B-cell lymphomagenesis [132]. Although the relationship between LMP-1 and lymphomagenesis has been relatively well established, the molecular mechanisms underlying AID induction remain to be fully clarified.
Roles of AID in B-cell lymphomagenesis
Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is normally expressed in germinal center (GC) B-cells [110], [133] (Fig. 6), where it plays a central role in both somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in humans and mice [134], [135]. AID converts single-stranded genomic cytidine to uracil, with pronounced activity in the immunoglobulin variable and switch regions [136], [137], [138], [139]. Aberrant expression of AID and abnormal targeting of AID activation in both B- and non-B-cells causes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and DNA point mutations in both Ig and non-Ig genes, inducing tumorigenesis [140]. AID is required for chromosomal DSBs at the c-myc and IgH loci, leading to reciprocal c-myc/IgH translocations and resulting in the development of B-cell lymphomas, such as Burkitt lymphoma in humans and plasmacytoma in mice [141]. AID protein is localized more in the cytoplasm than in the nucleus in normal and neoplastic B-cells, and cytoplasmic AID protein relocates to the nucleus when pathological change occurs in B-cells [142], [143]. A recent in vitro study by Kim et al. [144] has shown that LMP-1 increases genomic instability through Egr-1-mediated up regulation of AID in B-cell lymphoma cell lines.
Figure 6
Normal expression of AID in lymphoid tissue.
HE staining (a), AID (b). Normal expression of AID is evident in germinal centers of lymph nodes with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. (a, b, original magnification, ×100).
Normal expression of AID in lymphoid tissue.HE staining (a), AID (b). Normal expression of AID is evident in germinal centers of lymph nodes with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. (a, b, original magnification, ×100).
Roles of Egr-1 in B-cell lymphomagenesis
The early growth transcription response-1 (Egr-1) gene (also named zif268, NGFI-A, or Krox24) encodes an 80-kDa DNA-binding transcription factor [145]. Egr-1 is an exceptionally multi-functional transcription factor. In response to growth factors and cytokine signaling, Egr-1 regulates cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis [146]. Egr-1 has been associated with EBV infection [147]. First, Egr-1 is upregulated when EBV interacts with B lymphocytes at the initial infection stage, and constitutive expression of Egr-1 correlates with certain types of EBV latency in B-lymphoid cell lines [148]. EBV reactivation is associated with up-regulation of Egr-1, and Egr-1 can be induced as an EBV lytic transactivator [149].
Comparison of DLBCLs with MTX- and age-related EBV-associated B-cell LPDs
AID triggers somatic hypermutation and recombination, in turn contributing to lymphomagenesis. Such aberrant AID expression is seen in B-cell leukemia/lymphomas, including Burkitt lymphoma which is associated with c-myc translocation. Moreover, LMP-1 increases genomic instability through Egr-1 mediated upregulation of AID in B-cell lymphoma. We conducted an immunohistochemical study to investigate the relationship between AID and LMP-1 expression in 19 cases of LPD (MTX-/age-related EBV-associated), including 10 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) [110]. Immunoreactivity for AID was stronger in LPDs than in DLBCLs (Fig. 7). More intense AID expression was detected in LPDs (89.5%) than in DLBCLs (20.0%), and the expression of LMP-1 and EBER was more intense in LPDs (68.4% and 94.7%) than in DLBCLs (10.0% and 20.0%) [110]. Furthermore, stronger Egr-1 expression was found in MTX/age-related EBV-associated LPDs (83.3%) than in DLBCLs (30.0%). AID expression was significantly and constitutively overexpressed in LPDs relative to DLBCLs. These results suggest that increased AID expression in LPDs may be one of the processes involved in lymphomagenesis, thereby further increasing the survival of genetically destabilized B-cells (Fig. 8). AID expression may be a useful indicator for differentiation between LPDs and DLBCLs.
Figure 7
Distribution and intensity of AID expression in biopsy specimens of MTX-/age-related EBV-LPDs and DLBCLs.
HE stain (a–c), and AID (d–f) detected by IHC (brownish color). AID-positive atypical lymphoid cells show diffuse in MTX-LPD (d) and age-related LPD (e), but are few in DLBCL (f). AID positive cells show strong intensity in MTX-LPD (d) and Age-related LPD (e), and weak or moderate intensity in DLBCL (f). (a–f, original magnification, ×200).
Figure 8
A recent in vitro study by Kim et al. [144] has shown that LMP-1 increases genomic instability through Egr-1-mediated upregulation of AID in B-cell lymphoma cell lines. A recent in vivo study [110] has demonstrated overexpression of AID, including LMP-1 and Egr-1, in LPDs (MTX- and age- related) associated with pre-cancerous states due to immunosuppression in the head and neck. In LPDs that occur in patients who are immunosuppressed due to MTX administration or ageing, memory B-cells without mutation/translocation first express LMP-1 by reactivation of EBV latent genes. Secondly, LPDs with polyclonal growth show an increase AID expression through the LMP-1/NF-kB/Egr-1 signaling pathway, and LPDs with monoclonal proliferation undergo gene mutation or gene translocation throuugh the effect of increased AID. Abnormal long-term expression of AID in LPDs leads to development of true malignant lymphoma, and the changed malignant B-cell lymphomas show an increase of AID expression through acquired monoclonal growth. On the other hand, lymphoma caused by a gene mutation will develop when the expression of AID is absent or low involved.
Distribution and intensity of AID expression in biopsy specimens of MTX-/age-related EBV-LPDs and DLBCLs.HE stain (a–c), and AID (d–f) detected by IHC (brownish color). AID-positive atypical lymphoid cells show diffuse in MTX-LPD (d) and age-related LPD (e), but are few in DLBCL (f). AID positive cells show strong intensity in MTX-LPD (d) and Age-related LPD (e), and weak or moderate intensity in DLBCL (f). (a–f, original magnification, ×200).A recent in vitro study by Kim et al. [144] has shown that LMP-1 increases genomic instability through Egr-1-mediated upregulation of AID in B-cell lymphoma cell lines. A recent in vivo study [110] has demonstrated overexpression of AID, including LMP-1 and Egr-1, in LPDs (MTX- and age- related) associated with pre-cancerous states due to immunosuppression in the head and neck. In LPDs that occur in patients who are immunosuppressed due to MTX administration or ageing, memory B-cells without mutation/translocation first express LMP-1 by reactivation of EBV latent genes. Secondly, LPDs with polyclonal growth show an increase AID expression through the LMP-1/NF-kB/Egr-1 signaling pathway, and LPDs with monoclonal proliferation undergo gene mutation or gene translocation throuugh the effect of increased AID. Abnormal long-term expression of AID in LPDs leads to development of true malignant lymphoma, and the changed malignant B-cell lymphomas show an increase of AID expression through acquired monoclonal growth. On the other hand, lymphoma caused by a gene mutation will develop when the expression of AID is absent or low involved.
Conclusion
EBV infection is relate to cancers of lymphoid and epithelial tissues such as Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, NPC, gastric carcinoma and OSCC. However, it has remained uncertain whether EBV plays a role in lymphomagenesis and carcinogenesis of the oral cavity. Using PCR and ISH, we have found that EBV latent genes are present in B-cell-type lesions (LPDs) as well as in oral epithelial lesions (inflamed gingiva, severe epithelial dysplasia and OSCC). In particular, it was suggested that LMP-1 expression may play an important role in lymphomagenesis and carcinogenesis in the oral cavity. In the dysplasia-carcinoma sequence, LMP-1 expression was mostly higher in severe epithelial dysplasia than in OSCC. In LPDs, expression of LMP-1, Egr-1 and AID was higher than in DLBCLs. Both LPDs and severe epithelial dysplasia are considered to be precancerous conditions. Increased AID expression in LPDs of the oral cavity may be part of the process of lymphomagenesis, thereby further increasing the survival of genetically destabilized B-cells. Likewise, the LMP-1/Egr-1/AID signaling pathway may be related to the dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in the oral cavity. Further study is needed to clarify the role of EBV latent genes and their reactivation mechanisms for malignant transformation in oral disease.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest associated with this review.
Authors: F Wang; C D Gregory; M Rowe; A B Rickinson; D Wang; M Birkenbach; H Kikutani; T Kishimoto; E Kieff Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1987-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: María Victoria Preciado; Paola Andrea Chabay; Elena Noemí De Matteo; Pedro Gonzalez; Saúl Grinstein; Andrea Actis; Hugo Daniel Gass Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Humberto Jácome-Santos; Naira da Silva E Silva; Renata Gonçalves Resende; Helder Henrique Costa Pinheiro; Luiz Fernando Almeida Machado; Guilherme de Souza Silva; Fernando de Oliveira Costa; Igor Brasil-Costa; Ana Cláudia Braga Amoras-Alves; Ricardo Alves Mesquita; Sérgio de Melo Alves-Junior Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Seamus Balinth; Matthew L Fisher; Yon Hwangbo; Caizhi Wu; Carlos Ballon; Xueqin Sun; Alea A Mills Journal: Oncogene Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 8.756