| Literature DB >> 28630812 |
Yumeka Yamauchi1, Masae Konno1,2, Shota Ito1, Satoshi P Tsunoda1,2,3, Keiichi Inoue1,2,3,4, Hideki Kandori1,2.
Abstract
Microbial rhodopsins are membrane proteins found widely in archaea, eubacteria and eukaryotes (fungal and algal species). They have various functions, such as light-driven ion pumps, light-gated ion channels, light sensors and light-activated enzymes. A light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR) contains a DTD motif at positions 85, 89, and 96, which is unique to archaeal proton pumps. Recently, channelrhodopsins (ChRs) containing the DTD motif, whose sequential identity is ~20% similar to BR and to cation ChRs in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (CrCCRs), were found. While extensive studies on ChRs have been performed with CrCCR2, the molecular properties of DTD ChRs remain an intrigue. In this paper, we studied a DTD rhodopsin from G. theta (GtCCR4) using electrophysiological measurements, flash photolysis, and low-temperature difference FTIR spectroscopy. Electrophysiological measurements clearly showed that GtCCR4 functions as a light-gated cation channel, similar to other G. theta DTD ChRs (GtCCR1-3). Light-driven proton pump activity was also suggested for GtCCR4. Both electrophysiological and flash photolysis experiments showed that channel closing occurs upon reprotonation of the Schiff base, suggesting that the dynamics of retinal and channels are tightly coupled in GtCCR4. From Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy at 77 K, we found that the primary reaction is an all-trans to a 13-cis photoisomerization, like other microbial rhodopsins, although perturbations in the secondary structure were much smaller in GtCCR4 than in CrCCR2.Entities:
Keywords: flash photolysis; light-gated channel; light-induced difference FTIR spectra; microbial rhodopsin; patch clamp
Year: 2017 PMID: 28630812 PMCID: PMC5468465 DOI: 10.2142/biophysico.14.0_57
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biophys Physicobiol ISSN: 2189-4779
Amino acid sequences of the C-helix in various microbial rhodopsins
| 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BR | H+ pump | R | Y | A | W | L | F | T | P | L | L | L | L | |||
| PR | H+ pump | R | Y | I | W | L | L | V | P | L | L | I | C | |||
| KR2 | Na+ pump | R | Y | L | W | S | I | V | P | M | L | L | F | |||
| FR | Cl− pump | R | Y | G | W | T | I | V | P | I | L | L | T | |||
| Cl− pump | R | Y | L | W | A | L | T | P | M | I | L | L | ||||
| cation channel | R | Y | A | W | L | L | C | R | V | I | L | I | ||||
| cation channel | R | Y | A | W | L | L | C | P | V | I | L | I | ||||
| cation channel | R | Y | S | W | L | L | C | P | V | I | L | I | ||||
| cation channel | R | Y | M | W | L | M | C | P | V | I | L | I | ||||
| cation channel | P | Y | L | Y | A | T | C | P | L | L | T | L | ||||
| cation channel | P | Y | V | Y | C | T | C | P | L | L | T | L | ||||
| cation channel | K | Y | L | Y | L | F | C | P | L | L | T | I | ||||
| this study | K | Y | L | Y | I | F | C | P | I | L | T | L | ||||
| anion channel | R | M | A | W | L | C | C | P | I | M | L | G | ||||
| anion channel | R | M | A | W | L | C | C | P | I | M | L | G |
Abbreviations: BR, bacteriorhodopsin; PR, proteorhodopsin; KR2, Krokinobacter eikastus rhodopsin 2; FR, Fulvimarina rhodopsin; pHR, Natronomonas pharaonis halorhodopsin; CrCCR1 and 2, cation channelrhodopsin (ChR) 1 and 2, respectively from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; CaCCR1, cation ChR1 from Chlamydomonas augustae; MvCCR1, cation ChR1 from Mesostigma viride; GtCCR1, 2, 3 and 4, cation ChR1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively from Guillardia theta; GtACR1 and 2, anion ChR1 and 2, respectively from G. theta. The numbering scheme corresponds to the position of BR.
Figure 1Ion transport activity of GtCCR4 on ND7/23 cells recorded by a whole-cell patch clamp. (a) Representative photocurrents recorded at membrane potentials from −60 mV to +40 mV in 20 mV steps in standard solutions (See materials and methods). (b) Channel closing kinetics estimated by decay of photocurrents in standard solutions (N=8). Data represent the mean±SE. (c) I–V curves of stationary photocurrents with 110 mM (solid circle) or 0 mM (open circle) intercellular NaCl concentrations. The solution contained 110 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KCl 10 mM EGTA-NaOH and 10 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.2). A solution without Na+ contained 110 mM NMG-Cl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KCl 10 mM EGTA-NMG and 10 mM Hepes-NMG (pH 7.2). Extracellular solution contained 140 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM KCl and Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.2). The photocurrent amplitudes were normalized at −80 mV as −1.0. Data represent the mean±SE. (d) I–V curves of stationary photocurrents with extracellular pH 5.0 (open circle) or pH 7.2 (solid circle) in the absence of NaCl. Extracellular solution contained 140 mM NMG-Cl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2 and Hepes-NMG (pH 7.2) or citric acid (pH 5.0). Intercellular solution contained 110 mM NMG-Cl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM KCl 10 mM EGTA-NMG and 10 mM Hepes-NMG (pH 7.2). The x- and y-axis represent the membrane potential (mV) and normalized current, respectively. The currents were first measured at pHo 7.2 (solid circle), followed by change in solution to pH 5.0 (open circle) (N=3). The photocurrent amplitudes were normalized at −80 mV at pHo 7.2 (solid circle) as −1.0. The dashed line was the theoretical curve.
Figure 2Absorption spectrum of GtCCR4.
Figure 3Photocycle of GtCCR4. (a) Transient absorption spectra of GtCCR4. (b) Time traces of absorption changes of GtCCR4 at 377 (blue), 535 (green) and 598 (red) nm probe wavelengths. Solid lines indicate the fitted lines based on the sequential kinetic model shown in c. (c) Photocycle scheme of GtCCR4 determined by flash photolysis measurement.
Figure 4Difference FTIR spectra of GtCCR4 (a), C1C2 (b) and BR (c) between the K intermediate and the unphotolyzed state in the 1800–900 cm−1 region measured at 77 K. The sample films were hydrated with H2O (black) and D2O (red). One division of the y-axis corresponds to 0.002 absorbance units. The black spectrum in (a) was multiplied by 2.6. The spectra in (b) and (c) were multiplied by 0.95 and 0.081, respectively. The data in (b) and (c) are reproduced from Ito et al. [30] and Kandori et al. [42].