Literature DB >> 27766385

Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.

Xavier Flecher1,2, Benjamin Appy1,2, Sébastien Parratte1,2, Matthieu Ollivier3,4, Jean-Noel Argenson1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have reported short-term favourable results of tantalum-made components in acetabular revisions with bone loss. However, there is a lack of information regarding the mid to long-term results of such components.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to analyse the outcome and survivorship of acetabular revision hip arthroplasty using tantalum components for loosening associated with bone loss at a minimum of five-year follow-up.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 51 consecutive patients (51 hips) who had an acetabular revision using porous tantalum components at a minimum follow-up of five years. The mean age was 64 years (range, 31-87). There were 27 males and 24 females, 47 right hips and four left hips. Twenty-five (49 %) included a femoral revision. According to Paprosky's classification 18 hips were classified type 2A, 11 type 2B, ten type 2C, seven type 3A and five type 3B. No bone grafting was performed. Sixteen hips (31.3 %) required the use of additional tantalum-made augments stabilized by screws and cement at the cup-augment interface.
RESULTS: At a mean followup of 6.8 years (range, 5.1-10 years), the Harris hip score improved from 44 pre- operatively (range, 23-72) to 84 post-operatively (range, 33-98). The mean post-operative hip centre position in relation to the teardrop was 29 mm (range, 20-43 mm) horizontally and 21 mm (range, 8-36 mm) vertically. The mean acetabular inclination was 42° (range, 17-60°). Six hips (11.7 %) required a re-operation without component revision (two for chronic instability, one ossification removal, one haematoma, one deep infection and one periprosthetic femoral fracture). One patient required a cup re-revision for septic loosening. No aseptic loosening occurred. At last followup the radiological analysis showed one evolutive osteolysis and one screw breakage. The global survivorship was 92.3 % at 64 months. If only aseptic loosening was defined as the end-point the survivorship was 100 % at 64 months.
CONCLUSIONS: When facing an acetabular revision with severe bone loss, tantalum-made components can provide a stable fixation. This study at a minimum five-year follow-up compares favourably with other reconstruction techniques, but longer follow-up is still required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementless; Midterm results; Tantalum; Total hip arthroplasty revision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27766385     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3312-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  47 in total

1.  The role of cages and rings: when all else fails.

Authors:  Allan E Gross; Stuart Goodman
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.390

2.  Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments.

Authors:  Jonathan P Van Kleunen; Gwo-Chin Lee; Peter W Lementowski; Charles L Nelson; Jonathan P Garino
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cementless acetabular revision. Evaluation at an average of 10.5 years.

Authors:  S S Leopold; A G Rosenberg; R D Bhatt; M B Sheinkop; L R Quigley; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Clinical applications of Trabecular Metal.

Authors:  Michael J Christie
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-04

6.  The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.

Authors:  Daniel J Del Gaizo; Vamsi Kancherla; Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency.

Authors:  D J Berry; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09

9.  The Effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency: five to twenty-one years' follow-up.

Authors:  Panagiotis P Symeonides; George E Petsatodes; John D Pournaras; George A Kapetanos; Anastasios G Christodoulou; Dimitrios J Marougiannis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results.

Authors:  T J Gill; J B Sledge; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11
View more
  9 in total

1.  Customized implants for acetabular Paprosky III defects may be positioned with high accuracy in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Lena Witzmann; Jan Wieding; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz; Benjamin Craiovan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Management of Paprosky type three B acetabular defects by custom-made components: early results.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Matteo Giachino; Paolo Bedino; Danilo Mellano; Raimondo Piana; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Strategies for cup revision].

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jens Goronzy
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Acetabular revisions using porous tantalum components: A retrospective study with 5-10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Francesco Roberto Evola; Luciano Costarella; Giuseppe Evola; Martina Barchitta; Antonella Agodi; Giuseppe Sessa
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-07-18

5.  The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Qiang Xiao; Haoyang Wang; Kai Zhou; Duan Wang; Tingxian Ling; Fuxing Pei; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Custom 3D-Printed Triflange Implants for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Defects, with and without Pelvic Discontinuity: Early Results of Our First 19 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Vitali Goriainov; Leonard J King; Richard O C Oreffo; Douglas G Dunlop
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-10-21

Review 7.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Bilateral multiple periprosthetic hip fractures and joint dislocations secondary to general convulsive seizures.

Authors:  Qingyu Zhang; Fuqiang Gao; Wei Sun; Zirong Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Acetabular revision in total hip arthroplasty with tantalum augmentation and lyophilized bovine xenograft.

Authors:  Cristiano Valter Diesel; Tiango Aguiar Ribeiro; Marcelo Reuwsaat Guimarães; Carlos Alberto de Souza Macedo; Carlos Roberto Galia
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-08-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.