Literature DB >> 10611873

Cementless acetabular revision. Evaluation at an average of 10.5 years.

S S Leopold1, A G Rosenberg, R D Bhatt, M B Sheinkop, L R Quigley, J O Galante.   

Abstract

This study reviews the clinical and radiographic results of 138 consecutive cementless acetabular revisions in 131 patients performed for aseptic loosening at a mean of 10.5 years followup. Kaplan-Meier survivorship of these components was 84% at 11.5 years. Two components (1.8%) in two patients were considered aseptically loose based on radiographic criteria; one patient was symptomatic but the component was not revised because of the patient's poor health, and the other patient was asymptomatic. Pelvic osteolysis was present in 19 hips (17%), appearing at a mean of 103 months. All but two of these were small lesions (< 2 cm) at the periphery of the components. Nevertheless, the incidence of osteolysis has increased with time, and continued followup is warranted. Separation or fragmentation of the fiber-metal porous pads was uncommon (8.3%), but was significantly associated with pelvic osteolysis; this finding has not been reported before with this component. Five patients underwent late revision surgery (after 100 months), one for deep infection, one for periprosthetic femur fracture, and three for late recurrent dislocation. Harris hip scores averaged 81 points (good) at final followup, which is unchanged from the authors' last report on this group. Acetabular revision with a fiber-metal hemispherical component appears durable at a mean followup of more than 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10611873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  12 in total

Review 1.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Acetabular revisions using a cementless oblong cup: five to ten year results.

Authors:  R Civinini; A Capone; C Carulli; M Villano; M I Gusso
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Correlation of computed tomography with histology in the assessment of periprosthetic defect healing.

Authors:  Stephen D Cook; Laura P Patron; Samantha L Salkeld; Kirk E Smith; Bruce Whiting; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Benjamin Appy; Sébastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Early detection and treatment of wear particle-induced inflammation and bone loss in a mouse calvarial osteolysis model using HPMA copolymer conjugates.

Authors:  Ke Ren; P Edward Purdue; Lyndsey Burton; Ling-dong Quan; Edward V Fehringer; Geoffrey M Thiele; Steven R Goldring; Dong Wang
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Early diagnosis of orthopedic implant failure using macromolecular imaging agents.

Authors:  Ke Ren; Anand Dusad; Yijia Zhang; P Edward Purdue; Edward V Fehringer; Kevin L Garvin; Steven R Goldring; Dong Wang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  [Operative treatment of congenital hip osteoarthritis with high hip luxation (Crowe type IV)].

Authors:  H Kohlhof; K Ziebarth; S Gravius; D C Wirtz; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Cup-cage construct for massive acetabular defect in revision hip arthroplasty- A case series with medium to long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Dan Arvinte; Manish Kiran; Manoj Sood
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-25

10.  Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?

Authors:  Erik Hansen; David Shearer; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.