Literature DB >> 19582528

Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.

Paul F Lachiewicz1, Elizabeth S Soileau.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Although porous-coated hemispherical components are usually successful in acetabular revisions, the rate of failure is increased in hips with severe bone loss. Tantalum acetabular implants are characterized by higher friction, higher porosity, and greater osteoconductivity than titanium mesh or chrome-cobalt beads. We asked whether these components would provide stable short-term fixation without radiographic loosening in revisions at higher risk for failure. We prospectively followed 37 patients (39 hips) who had an acetabular revision with tantalum acetabular components. The minimum followup time was 2 years (mean, 3.3 years; range, 2-7 years). The acetabular defects were classified as Paprosky et al. Type 3 in 26, Type 2 in 11, and Type 1 in two hips. The mean postoperative Harris hip score was 86. Thirty-eight of the 39 (97%) tantalum components were radiographically well fixed. There was one mechanical failure at 6 months, rerevised with a larger tantalum component. Bone ingrowth was apparent in 38 hips and four hips had a radiolucent line. There were six other reoperations, three recurrent dislocations (constrained liners leaving the shell in place), two infections that seeded to the hip from elsewhere and treated with drainage, and one supracondylar femur fracture, but the tantalum component was left in place. Tantalum acetabular components provide stable fixation in difficult acetabular revisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19582528      PMCID: PMC2806976          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0940-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; G J Stackpool; S A Hacking; M Tanzer; J J Krygier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

2.  A novel constrained acetabular liner design with increased range of motion.

Authors:  B R Burroughs; G J Golladay; B Hallstrom; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Nehme; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brett Levine; Craig J Della Valle; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects.

Authors:  Steven H Weeden; Robert H Schmidt
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A L Whaley; D J Berry; W S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander Siegmeth; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Winston Y Kim; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Factors influencing the longer-term survival of uncemented acetabular components used in total hip revisions.

Authors:  Carroll P Jones; Paul F Lachiewicz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 3.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Biological strategies for improved osseointegration and osteoinduction of porous metal orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Eric Alexander Lewallen; Scott M Riester; Carolina A Bonin; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Amel Dudakovic; Sanjeev Kakar; Robert C Cohen; Jennifer J Westendorf; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Jane Anne O'Dell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Benjamin Appy; Sébastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.

Authors:  Tomas Amenabar; Wael A Rahman; Bandar M Hetaimish; Paul R Kuzyk; Oleg A Safir; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Rosario Madero; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip after oblong cups in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Ricardo Fernández-Fernández; David Durán; Rosario Madero
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.