Literature DB >> 18534474

The Effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency: five to twenty-one years' follow-up.

Panagiotis P Symeonides1, George E Petsatodes, John D Pournaras, George A Kapetanos, Anastasios G Christodoulou, Dimitrios J Marougiannis.   

Abstract

From 1985 to 2001, the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage (B-S APC) was implanted in 57 cases (55 patients) with massive acetabular deficiency. The B-S APC survived until the last review 5 to 21 years after operation in 89.5% of the cases, produced substantial pain relief, and increased range of hip motion and walking capacity. The 10.5% failure rate was due to aseptic loosening in 2 cases and mechanical failure in 4 cases. It appears that application of the B-S APC in extensive acetabular deficiency presents a durable solution provided that proper indications and technique are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534474     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; B M Holzapfel; R Gradinger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  CORR Insights(®): THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Benjamin Appy; Sébastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Saurabh Gupta; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-17

7.  Early results of revision acetabular cup using antiprotrusio reconstruction rings and allografts.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kmieć; Tomasz Dorman; Grzegorzewski Andrzej; Marek Synder; Piotr Kozłowski; Marcin Sibiński
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?

Authors:  Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Dorothee Sieber; Georg Gosheger; Jan C Theil; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Dimosthenis Andreou; Ralf Dieckmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  [Revision reasons and prosthesis selection of Crowe developmental dysplasia of hip after total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  Junmin Shen; Yonggang Zhou; Jingyang Sun; Haiyang Ma; Yinqiao Du; Zhisen Gao; Yawen Peng; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05-15

10.  Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Ingrid Bonetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.