Literature DB >> 30306217

Customized implants for acetabular Paprosky III defects may be positioned with high accuracy in revision hip arthroplasty.

Markus Weber1, Lena Witzmann2, Jan Wieding3, Joachim Grifka2, Tobias Renkawitz2, Benjamin Craiovan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In revision hip arthroplasty, custom-made implants are one option in patients with acetabular Paprosky III defects.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 11 patients undergoing cup revision using a custom-made implant. The accuracy of the intended position of the implant was assessed on post-operative 3D CT and compared to the pre-operative 3D planning in terms of inclination, anteversion, and centre of rotation. In addition, the accuracy of post-operative plain radiographs for measuring implant position was evaluated in relation to the 3D CT standard.
RESULTS: We found a mean deviation between the planned and the final position of the custom-made acetabular implant on 3D CT of 3.6° ± 2.8° for inclination and of - 1.2° ± 7.0° for anteversion, respectively. Restoration of center of rotation succeeded with an accuracy of 0.3 mm ± 3.9 mm in the mediolateral (x) direction, - 1.1 mm ± 3.8 mm in the anteroposterior (y) direction, and 0.4 mm ± 3.2 mm in the craniocaudal (z) direction. The accuracy of the post-operative plain radiographs in measuring the position of the custom-made implant in relation to 3D CT was 1.1° ± 1.7° for implant inclination, - 2.6° ± 1.3° for anteversion and 1.3 mm ± 3.5 mm in the x-direction, and - 0.9 mm ± 3.8 mm in the z-direction for centre of rotation.
CONCLUSION: Custom-made acetabular implants can be positioned with good accuracy in Paprosky III defects according to the pre-operative planning. Plain radiographs are adequate for assessing implant position in routine follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D CT; Acetabular Paprosky III defects; Custom-made implant; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30306217     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4193-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees.

Authors:  K L Ong; F S Mowat; N Chan; E Lau; M T Halpern; S M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The operation of the century: total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth; Claire Young; Cecil Rorabeck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction.

Authors:  M T Hirschmann; P Konala; F Amsler; F Iranpour; N F Friederich; J P Cobb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-05

4.  Health-related quality of life after knee replacement.

Authors:  G Hawker; J Wright; P Coyte; J Paul; R Dittus; R Croxford; B Katz; C Bombardier; D Heck; D Freund
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Volpin; S Konan; C Biz; R J Tansey; F S Haddad
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-04-13

6.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Chen Xu; Jiawei Xu; Huiwu Li; Fengxiang Liu; Degang Yu; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies.

Authors:  Laurent Audigé; Mohit Bhandari; James Kellam
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-04

9.  Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; Jeffrey A Krempec; John C Clohisy; Douglas J McDonald; William M Ricci; Erin L Ruh; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Trainee Surgeons Affect Operative Time but not Outcome in Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Achim Benditz; Michael Woerner; Daniela Weber; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  7 in total

1.  Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Francesco Chiarlone; Andrea Zanirato; Luca Cavagnaro; Mattia Alessio-Mazzola; Lamberto Felli; Giorgio Burastero
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  [Infected endoprosthesis in patients with rheumatism].

Authors:  Markus Weber; M Meyer; J Grifka
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Shape suitability and mechanical safety of customised hip implants: Three-dimensional printed acetabular cup for hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yeokyung Kang; Doo-Hoon Sun; Jong-Chul Park; Jungsung Kim
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-27

4.  Use of a new off-the-shelf 3D-printed trabecular titanium acetabular cup in Chinese patients undergoing hip revision surgery: Short- to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Guangqian Shang; Shuai Xiang; Cuicui Guo; Jianjun Guo; Peng Wang; Yingzhen Wang; Hao Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Three-dimensional-printed titanium implants for severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty: short- and mid-term results.

Authors:  Sheng Fang; Yiming Wang; Peng Xu; Junke Zhu; Jinbo Liu; Huan Li; Xiaoliang Sun
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Good results at 2-year follow-up of a custom-made triflange acetabular component for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity: a prospective case series of 50 hips.

Authors:  Marieke Scharff-Baauw; Miranda L Van Hooff; Gijs G Van Hellemondt; Paul C Jutte; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Mid-term results of revision surgery using double-trabecular metal cups alone or combined with impaction bone grafting for complex acetabular defects.

Authors:  Xianghong Zhang; Zhihong Li; Wanchun Wang; Tang Liu; Weiqiu Peng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.