Markus Weber1, Lena Witzmann2, Jan Wieding3, Joachim Grifka2, Tobias Renkawitz2, Benjamin Craiovan2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regensburg University, Medical Center, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany. markus.weber@klinik.uni-regensburg.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regensburg University, Medical Center, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany. 3. AQ Implants GmbH, Ahrensburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In revision hip arthroplasty, custom-made implants are one option in patients with acetabular Paprosky III defects. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 11 patients undergoing cup revision using a custom-made implant. The accuracy of the intended position of the implant was assessed on post-operative 3D CT and compared to the pre-operative 3D planning in terms of inclination, anteversion, and centre of rotation. In addition, the accuracy of post-operative plain radiographs for measuring implant position was evaluated in relation to the 3D CT standard. RESULTS: We found a mean deviation between the planned and the final position of the custom-made acetabular implant on 3D CT of 3.6° ± 2.8° for inclination and of - 1.2° ± 7.0° for anteversion, respectively. Restoration of center of rotation succeeded with an accuracy of 0.3 mm ± 3.9 mm in the mediolateral (x) direction, - 1.1 mm ± 3.8 mm in the anteroposterior (y) direction, and 0.4 mm ± 3.2 mm in the craniocaudal (z) direction. The accuracy of the post-operative plain radiographs in measuring the position of the custom-made implant in relation to 3D CT was 1.1° ± 1.7° for implant inclination, - 2.6° ± 1.3° for anteversion and 1.3 mm ± 3.5 mm in the x-direction, and - 0.9 mm ± 3.8 mm in the z-direction for centre of rotation. CONCLUSION: Custom-made acetabular implants can be positioned with good accuracy in Paprosky III defects according to the pre-operative planning. Plain radiographs are adequate for assessing implant position in routine follow-up.
PURPOSE: In revision hip arthroplasty, custom-made implants are one option in patients with acetabular Paprosky III defects. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we identified 11 patients undergoing cup revision using a custom-made implant. The accuracy of the intended position of the implant was assessed on post-operative 3D CT and compared to the pre-operative 3D planning in terms of inclination, anteversion, and centre of rotation. In addition, the accuracy of post-operative plain radiographs for measuring implant position was evaluated in relation to the 3D CT standard. RESULTS: We found a mean deviation between the planned and the final position of the custom-made acetabular implant on 3D CT of 3.6° ± 2.8° for inclination and of - 1.2° ± 7.0° for anteversion, respectively. Restoration of center of rotation succeeded with an accuracy of 0.3 mm ± 3.9 mm in the mediolateral (x) direction, - 1.1 mm ± 3.8 mm in the anteroposterior (y) direction, and 0.4 mm ± 3.2 mm in the craniocaudal (z) direction. The accuracy of the post-operative plain radiographs in measuring the position of the custom-made implant in relation to 3D CT was 1.1° ± 1.7° for implant inclination, - 2.6° ± 1.3° for anteversion and 1.3 mm ± 3.5 mm in the x-direction, and - 0.9 mm ± 3.8 mm in the z-direction for centre of rotation. CONCLUSION: Custom-made acetabular implants can be positioned with good accuracy in Paprosky III defects according to the pre-operative planning. Plain radiographs are adequate for assessing implant position in routine follow-up.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D CT; Acetabular Paprosky III defects; Custom-made implant; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty
Authors: G Hawker; J Wright; P Coyte; J Paul; R Dittus; R Croxford; B Katz; C Bombardier; D Heck; D Freund Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Robert L Barrack; Jeffrey A Krempec; John C Clohisy; Douglas J McDonald; William M Ricci; Erin L Ruh; Ryan M Nunley Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Marieke Scharff-Baauw; Miranda L Van Hooff; Gijs G Van Hellemondt; Paul C Jutte; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Maarten Spruit Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 3.717